Re: classless behaviour

2001-03-18 Thread Robert Padjen
ot exactly known then it is dropped without the command ip classless on. With it on the same packet will go to the "nearest matching route". -Original Message- From: Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 March 2001 05:22 To: Cisco Group Study Subject: classles

RE: classless behaviour

2001-03-18 Thread McCallum, Robert
is not exactly known then it is dropped without the command ip classless on. With it on the same packet will go to the "nearest matching route". -Original Message- From: Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 March 2001 05:22 To: Cisco Group Study Subject: classless behaviour Hi, To

Re: classless behaviour

2001-03-18 Thread George
ot;. -Original Message- From: Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 March 2001 05:22 To: Cisco Group Study Subject: classless behaviour Hi, To configure classless behaviour, we use "ip subnet-zero" and "ip classless". I never understand them, even after rea

classless behaviour

2001-03-17 Thread Bill
Hi, To configure classless behaviour, we use "ip subnet-zero" and "ip classless". I never understand them, even after reading Doyle's bible. * When do we need them ? * If we don't use them, what will happen ? * Is there good example to show their effect ? Thank y

Re: classless behaviour

2001-03-17 Thread Groupstudy
it is unavoidable. Until then, forget about it unless you are running an old DV routing protocol at work. - Original Message - From: Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Cisco Group Study [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 9:22 PM Subject: classless behaviour Hi, To configure classless

Re: classless behaviour

2001-03-17 Thread Larry Lamb
sues. Hi, To configure classless behaviour, we use "ip subnet-zero" and "ip classless". I never understand them, even after reading Doyle's bible. * When do we need them ? * If we don't use them, what will happen ? * Is there good example to show their effect ?