RE: classless routing [7:13847]

2001-07-27 Thread Gary Clevenger
It would follow the default route. This is because it is not a match for either of the other two routes. If IP Classless were not turned on, the packet would be dropped. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14019&t=13847 -

Re: classless routing [7:13847]

2001-07-26 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
At 04:56 AM 7/26/01, suleman ibrahim aboo wrote: >Can you please explain what would happen and why. > > >A router has ip classless enabled. It's routing table has entries for >10.5.0.0/16 and 10.6.0.0/16 and a default route 0.0.0.0. A packet arrives >for a destination on 10.7.0.0/16. Which route d

RE: classless routing [7:13847]

2001-07-26 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
://www.oledrews.com/job ~~~ -Original Message- From: suleman ibrahim aboo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 3:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: classless routing [7:13847] Can you please explain what would happen and why. A router has ip

FW: classless routing [7:13847]

2001-07-26 Thread Burnham, Chris
-Original Message- From: Burnham, Chris Sent: 26 July 2001 12:14 To: 'suleman ibrahim aboo' Subject: RE: classless routing [7:13847] It will take the default route for the following reason: first of all I assume that you are running a classfull protocol such as RIP or I

classless routing [7:13847]

2001-07-26 Thread suleman ibrahim aboo
Can you please explain what would happen and why. A router has ip classless enabled. It's routing table has entries for 10.5.0.0/16 and 10.6.0.0/16 and a default route 0.0.0.0. A packet arrives for a destination on 10.7.0.0/16. Which route does it take ? thanks in advance _