I have two questions regarding using the all ones and/or the all zeros
subnet.
Recently one of my co-workers started studying for CCNA and while
reviewing subnets he kept telling me that you could not use the all zero
or all ones subnet. The Win95, NT, and LINUX hosts didn't have a
problem with
Comments within:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
David Chandler
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2001 11:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:designing subnets with all ones/zeros.. [7:695]
I have two questions regarding using
14, 2001 11:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: designing subnets with all ones/zeros.. [7:695]
>
> I have two questions regarding using the all ones and/or the all zeros
> subnet.
>
> Recently one of my co-workers started studying for CCNA and while
> revi
ot there...
>
> Thanks
>
> DaveC
>
> Chuck Larrieu wrote:
>
> > Comments within:
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> > David Chandler
> > Sent: Saturday, April 14,
ECTED]] On Behalf Of
David Chandler
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 12:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: designing subnets with all ones/zeros.. [7:695]
Chuck
Thanks for the proof read :>
Bellow is the cisco page & part of the doc relating to zero subnets.
To me it reads
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
>David Chandler
>Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2001 12:42 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: designing subnets with all ones/zeros.. [7:695]
>
>Chuck
>
>Thanks for the proof read :>
>
>Bellow is the cisco page & part
tice for the lab that I have had situations
> >exactly as described in the link you provide. I don't recall problems, but
> >then the lab is not reality ;->
> >
> >Chuck
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
had
situations
>> >exactly as described in the link you provide. I don't recall problems,
but
>> >then the lab is not reality ;->
>> >
>> >Chuck
>> >
>> >-Original Message-
>> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
t trial & error or has
> microsoft documented this? I hate spending an hour looking for a document
> that
> is not there...
>
> Thanks
>
> DaveC
>
>
> Chuck Larrieu wrote:
>
> > Comments within:
> >
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: [E
ndows is not rfc1812 compiant and that it allows
wacky
>> subnets and disallows some valid subnets. Was that trial & error or has
>> microsoft documented this? I hate spending an hour looking for a document
>> that
>> is not there...
>>
>> Thanks
>>
&g
10 matches
Mail list logo
