Is it common/practical to run IP and IPX over the same
frame relay subinterface?
I am only asking because in Lammle's CCNA prep book it
is mentioned that one of the advantages of
subinterfaces is that you can run IP on one and IPX on
another. BUT, the example directly following that
statement
, May 30, 2000 6:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: frame relay newbie question
Is it common/practical to run IP and IPX over the same
frame relay subinterface?
I am only asking because in Lammle's CCNA prep book it
is mentioned that one of the advantages of
subinterfaces is that you can run IP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Dan West
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 3:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: frame relay newbie question
Is it common/practical to run IP and IPX over the same
frame relay subinterface?
CL: Yes. Why
Holland
CCNP,MCSE
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Larrieu" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Dan West" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 8:11 AM
Subject: RE: frame relay newbie question
Is it common/practical to run IP and IPX over the same
fram
Title: NetWare 5.0 was RE: frame relay newbie question
Yes, you are correct. I am working on a large project for a county school system and they are currently upgrading all of their servers to NetWare 5.0 The funny part is that at first we were using IP/IPX in compatibility mode and then were
from now on, phasing IPX out, am I correct?)
Richard Holland
CCNP,MCSE
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Larrieu" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Dan West" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 8:11 AM
Subject: RE: frame relay newbie que
Yes it is common to run IP and IPX on the same
frame relay subinterface. The real advantage to using
subinterfaces on frame is to fix some headaches with
routing protocols in a NBMA network.
As for IPX being an issue much longer... That depends on
your customers. Even Novell has indicated that
7 matches
Mail list logo
