Suppose I have several routers making up an iBGP mesh. Lets
suppose I have two routers (R1 and R2) which are advertising the same
set of networks: N1, N2, ... Nk.
OSPF is running underneath BGP (assume area 0). All of the N
networks are being advertised with a next-hop set to the respective
lo
a couple of things - in line below
""bergenpeak"" wrote in message
news:200211120028.AAA03239@;groupstudy.com...
> Suppose I have several routers making up an iBGP mesh. Lets
> suppose I have two routers (R1 and R2) which are advertising the same
> set of networks: N1, N2, ... Nk.
>
> OSPF is
One clarification below.
On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 21:51, The Long and Winding Road wrote:
> a couple of things - in line below
>
>
>
> ""bergenpeak"" wrote in message
> news:200211120028.AAA03239@;groupstudy.com...
> > Suppose I have several routers making up an iBGP mesh. Lets
> > suppose I hav
Thanks. So the removal of a BGP route from the routing table will not
cause the BGP process to be tickled to run and possibly re-insert a new
route for N1, N2, .. Nk through R2?
Does the "no sync" apply here? The book examples always mention "no
sync"
in conjunction with eBGP and sending adve
""bergenpeak"" wrote in message
news:200211121340.NAA13803@;groupstudy.com...
> Thanks. So the removal of a BGP route from the routing table will not
> cause the BGP process to be tickled to run and possibly re-insert a new
> route for N1, N2, .. Nk through R2?
depends on how your are set up in
5 matches
Mail list logo