iBGP and convergence when failure happens [7:57255]

Suppose I have several routers making up an iBGP mesh. Lets suppose I have two routers (R1 and R2) which are advertising the same set of networks: N1, N2, ... Nk. OSPF is running underneath BGP (assume area 0). All of the N networks are being advertised with a next-hop set to the respective lo

Re: iBGP and convergence when failure happens [7:57255]

a couple of things - in line below ""bergenpeak"" wrote in message news:200211120028.AAA03239@;groupstudy.com... > Suppose I have several routers making up an iBGP mesh. Lets > suppose I have two routers (R1 and R2) which are advertising the same > set of networks: N1, N2, ... Nk. > > OSPF is

Re: iBGP and convergence when failure happens [7:57255]

One clarification below. On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 21:51, The Long and Winding Road wrote: > a couple of things - in line below > > > > ""bergenpeak"" wrote in message > news:200211120028.AAA03239@;groupstudy.com... > > Suppose I have several routers making up an iBGP mesh. Lets > > suppose I hav

Re: iBGP and convergence when failure happens [7:57255]

Thanks. So the removal of a BGP route from the routing table will not cause the BGP process to be tickled to run and possibly re-insert a new route for N1, N2, .. Nk through R2? Does the "no sync" apply here? The book examples always mention "no sync" in conjunction with eBGP and sending adve

Re: iBGP and convergence when failure happens [7:57255]

""bergenpeak"" wrote in message news:200211121340.NAA13803@;groupstudy.com... > Thanks. So the removal of a BGP route from the routing table will not > cause the BGP process to be tickled to run and possibly re-insert a new > route for N1, N2, .. Nk through R2? depends on how your are set up in