oss McCormick"
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 3:57 AM
Subject: Re: ipsec and nat [7:12825]
> Two scenarios:
>
> 1) End point --- NAT --- IPSec --- IPSec --- Endpoint
> 2) End point --- IPSec --- NAT --- IPSec --- Endpoint
>
> Ignoring fancy tricks, scenario 1
c tunnel.
> thanks.
>
>
> >From: "Dennis H"
> >Reply-To: "Dennis H"
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: ipsec and nat [7:12825]
> >Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 12:23:48 -0400
> >
> >I believe you mean ipsec over nat, as opp
can
not perform the translation and route it over the IPsec tunnel.
thanks.
>From: "Dennis H"
>Reply-To: "Dennis H"
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: ipsec and nat [7:12825]
>Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 12:23:48 -0400
>
>I believe you mean ipsec over nat
I believe you mean ipsec over nat, as opposed to nat over ipsec... the vpn
concentrators can do it using udp port forwarding but this only work if
you're using Cisco's vpn client.
""Fly Ers"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Anyone confirm whether pix, concentrato
Anyone confirm whether pix, concentrator or ipsec router has the ability to
nat over ipsec? i know that I can nat everything on a router behind one of
these devices.
Thanks.
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://expl
5 matches
Mail list logo