Re: ipsec and nat [7:12825]

2001-07-19 Thread Allen May
oss McCormick" To: Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 3:57 AM Subject: Re: ipsec and nat [7:12825] > Two scenarios: > > 1) End point --- NAT --- IPSec --- IPSec --- Endpoint > 2) End point --- IPSec --- NAT --- IPSec --- Endpoint > > Ignoring fancy tricks, scenario 1

Re: ipsec and nat [7:12825]

2001-07-19 Thread Ross McCormick
c tunnel. > thanks. > > > >From: "Dennis H" > >Reply-To: "Dennis H" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: ipsec and nat [7:12825] > >Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 12:23:48 -0400 > > > >I believe you mean ipsec over nat, as opp

Re: ipsec and nat [7:12825]

2001-07-18 Thread Fly Ers
can not perform the translation and route it over the IPsec tunnel. thanks. >From: "Dennis H" >Reply-To: "Dennis H" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: ipsec and nat [7:12825] >Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 12:23:48 -0400 > >I believe you mean ipsec over nat

Re: ipsec and nat [7:12825]

2001-07-18 Thread Dennis H
I believe you mean ipsec over nat, as opposed to nat over ipsec... the vpn concentrators can do it using udp port forwarding but this only work if you're using Cisco's vpn client. ""Fly Ers"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Anyone confirm whether pix, concentrato

ipsec and nat [7:12825]

2001-07-18 Thread Fly Ers
Anyone confirm whether pix, concentrator or ipsec router has the ability to nat over ipsec? i know that I can nat everything on a router behind one of these devices. Thanks. _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://expl