And soon there's going to be millions of Mac OS X Unix boxes under
attack. Macintoshes used to be pretty safe. Apple must have some concerns
I would think.
Just rambling..
Priscilla
At 12:56 AM 5/8/01, Carroll Kong wrote:
At 11:38 PM 5/7/01 -0400, Chuck Larrieu wrote:
Check out
tendencies.
Just my re-contribution of 2 cents out of my stockpile I collected ;)
- Original Message -
From: Control Program
To:
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: linux on a 2500 ? Was: Programming under IOS [7:3362]
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 01:28:25PM -0400, Chuck Larrieu wrote
design but gives too much information to those with more destructive
tendencies.
Just my re-contribution of 2 cents out of my stockpile I collected ;)
- Original Message -
From: Control Program
To:
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: linux on a 2500 ? Was: Programming u
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 8:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: linux on a 2500 ? Was: Programming under IOS [7:3362]
Of course if the source is open, it has more eyes looking at it (than say M$
software which seems to be having a new security announcement
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Chuck Larrieu
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 11:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: linux on a 2500 ? Was: Programming under IOS [7:3362]
Check out http://www.attrition.org/mirror/attrition/
Interesting to read the history files
At 11:09 PM 5/7/01 -0400, Jason Roysdon wrote:
Of course if the source is open, it has more eyes looking at it (than say M$
software which seems to be having a new security announcement every week
right now).
--
Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+
List email: [EMAIL
At 11:38 PM 5/7/01 -0400, Chuck Larrieu wrote:
Check out http://www.attrition.org/mirror/attrition/
Interesting to read the history files. It would appear that nearly half of
compromised servers are NOT Wintels. Which says a lot about the security of
ALL operating systems.
Chuck
Without
Interesting that Cisco has yet to implement SSH2. Their speed on fixing
bugs for the CallManager line is less than impressive (the Unity guys rock).
I really dislike selling broken products. And I *like* Cisco for the most
part (especially if you compare them to others). Just some thoughts.
It has already BEEN done !! :-)
Brian wrote in message
011d01c0bd97$a7d15880$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:011d01c0bd97$a7d15880$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
netbsd is the most portable of the free nixes, thatd be the one to expect,
if one could do it.
Brian Whalen
- Original Message -
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Jason wrote:
|It has already BEEN done !! :-)
got a url for us ?
--
jacques
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=3363t=3362
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Jacques Atlas wrote:
||It has already BEEN done !! :-)
|
|got a url for us ?
http://www.mcvax.org/~koen/uClinux-cisco2500/
--
jacques
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=3364t=3362
--
FAQ, list
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Jacques Atlas
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 7:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: linux on a 2500 ? Was: Programming under IOS [7:3362]
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Jacques Atlas wrote:
||It has
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 01:28:25PM -0400, Chuck Larrieu wrote:
Without getting into the relative merits of router running open versus
closed code, or the obvious cost issue, what would be the advantage of a
Linux OS versus IOS?
Why not consider open versus closed source code? The public
13 matches
Mail list logo
