it or overload the capacity, they may not bother you for years, can a
rotuer in an IP network do that?
Kent
- Original Message -
From: "bbfaye"
To:
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 1:21 AM
Subject: Re: mpls-l2 vpn vs. vlan [7:49346]
> Kent,
> I heard equant guys managing a
Peter,
> To me, its LANE all
> over again, ie lets take a scalable, robust, intelligent technology and
try
> and bridge with it. As far as building MANs with Spanning Tree as your
> control protocol, I might suggest that it will give you a real headache
> from a scaling and provisioning standpo
In my impression,most switches can not afford to large number of 802.1q vlan
trunk. hundreds of tunk vlan will cause the machine poor performance or
crash.
I suffer it with some intel's switches before.
I heard cisco and other vendor suggest not to use too many vlan trunk in
their
machine. is it t
At 04:12 PM 7/23/2002 +, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>At 1:46 PM + 7/23/02, Peter van Oene wrote:
> >Before going down this road, I tend to wonder what drives people this
> >direction. Exactly what is it about poorly scaling, flat networks that
> >turn people on?
>
>My impression is that i
At 1:46 PM + 7/23/02, Peter van Oene wrote:
>Before going down this road, I tend to wonder what drives people this
>direction. Exactly what is it about poorly scaling, flat networks that
>turn people on?
My impression is that it is an unholy alliance of traditional telcos
and traditional ve
At 1:46 PM + 7/23/02, Kent Yu wrote:
>I cannot see any problem using vlan from your access layer up to the
>aggregation point, as long as the PE has enough capacity to hold the routes.
>If necessary, you can always use several PEs in one location to spread out
>your aggregation, you may want t
Before going down this road, I tend to wonder what drives people this
direction. Exactly what is it about poorly scaling, flat networks that
turn people on? Last I checked, IP did a pretty decent job of providing a
robust means of interconnection between remote sites. To me, its LANE all
ov
I cannot see any problem using vlan from your access layer up to the
aggregation point, as long as the PE has enough capacity to hold the routes.
If necessary, you can always use several PEs in one location to spread out
your aggregation, you may want to use some lower end routers/switches, kind
o
we are handling a case of a MAN project now.
We plan to use mpls-l2 vpn to connect the business subscribers.That means we
have to place some mpls-enabled machines on the access nodes(expensive...).
Another choice is using vlan.And the users' vlan are trunked to the
aggressive
nodes.I think it's no
9 matches
Mail list logo
