Re: question regarding spanning tree [7:6485]

2001-05-31 Thread Nuno Morais
. Regards, Nuno Morais From: Buri, Heather H Reply-To: Buri, Heather H To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: question regarding spanning tree [7:6485] Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 13:20:07 -0400 Hello. I don't really have a problem so much as I am trying to get a better understanding of how Spanning Tree

question regarding spanning tree [7:6485]

2001-05-30 Thread Buri, Heather H
Hello. I don't really have a problem so much as I am trying to get a better understanding of how Spanning Tree works. I am currently studying for my switching exam and am reviewing Spanning Tree. I have the following statement from the Cisco course manual and in the case of redundant paths to

RE: question regarding spanning tree [7:6485]

2001-05-30 Thread Williamson, Paul
PROTECTED] Subject: question regarding spanning tree [7:6485] Hello. I don't really have a problem so much as I am trying to get a better understanding of how Spanning Tree works. I am currently studying for my switching exam and am reviewing Spanning Tree. I have the following statement from

RE: question regarding spanning tree [7:6485]

2001-05-30 Thread Buri, Heather H
-Original Message- From: Williamson, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 12:45 PM To: 'Buri, Heather H'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: question regarding spanning tree [7:6485] Heather, Its the received port id You should find that port 1/2 is connected to the 6509

Re: question regarding spanning tree [7:6485]

2001-05-30 Thread Peter I. Slow
, Heather H To: Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 1:20 PM Subject: question regarding spanning tree [7:6485] Hello. I don't really have a problem so much as I am trying to get a better understanding of how Spanning Tree works. I am currently studying for my switching exam and am reviewing Spanning