RE: route redistribution [7:74856]

Hmmm... Maybe it the fact that I forgot that the route needs to exist in the route table to be redistributed. If all intents and purposes, I will associate the application of new metrics burden on the receiving protocol. I feel safe in that assumption. Thanks for the clarification... Message Po

RE: route redistribution [7:74856]

The application of the metric is done at the time of redistribution not after. Remember that the router already knows of the route and has it in its routing table it is just in a "different language"(protocol) than the recieving protocol understands so a translation is done. This in concept is redi

RE: route redistribution [7:74856]

That description on page 698 sounds like as if there was a thing called "router" between EIGRP and OSPF. In reality, the redistribution is handled by the (code that belongs to the) receiving protocol. Thanks, Zsombor John Jones wrote: > > I am studying for CCIE Written and lately have been > co

route redistribution [7:74856]

I am studying for CCIE Written and lately have been concentrating on redistribution. I have come across two statements in Doyle's V.1 that I am a bit confused about. On page 698 under the Metric section, he states that a cost must be assigned to each EIGRP route **BEFORE** passing it into OSPF and