Our existing network consists of a flat network at 172.16.0.0 with a mask of
255.255.0.0 and 172.31.0.0 with a mask of 255.255.0.0. Since it is flat,
the networks are 172.16.2.0 - 172.16.12.0 mask 255.255.0.0. EIGRP is
running. Now, the question I have is, if I create new subnets to segment
I can't any reason why it wouldn't work. The only thing I would mention is
that older IOS using EIGRP doesn't allow you to specify a mask with the
network command, and wouldn't allow you to be granular with your networks if
you don't want to specify all of them to be known in EIGRP. If you want
No problem:
#1. The addresses listed do not overlap (all different class Bs), and EIGRP
handles
VLSM. **see #2**
#2. EIGRP by default auto-summarizes at classful boundries, so either use NO
IP
AUTO-SUMMARY, or make sure you don't create multiple clouds of
172.20.xxx.xxx/24
networks.
DaveC
S
No problem:
#1. The addresses listed do not overlap (all different class Bs), and EIGRP
handles
VLSM. **see #2**
#2. EIGRP by default auto-summarizes at classful boundries, so either use:
(config-router)#NO AUTO-SUMMARY {on all eigrp routers.}
Or make just make sure you don't create mult
The most acurate address mask (prefix) would win. Even if you had
172.16.0.0/16 then put in an address of 172.16.20.0/24 the /24 would get a
choice over the /16.
That's what I understood and has been done a lot with EIGRP.
Teunis,
Hobart, Tasmania
Australia
On Sunday, April 15, 2001 at 11:31:
01 3:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: subnets [7:638]
The most acurate address mask (prefix) would win. Even if you had
172.16.0.0/16 then put in an address of 172.16.20.0/24 the /24 would get a
choice over the /16.
That's what I understood and has been done a lot with EIGR
6 matches
Mail list logo
