sometimes when I do a traceroute it skeeps some routers. Is there any
way to adjusst time out or something to get traceroute to show all the
routers that packet is going through?
Regards,
Alex
[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name
of khramov.vcf]
Messag
chances are, it's not skipping them but without an icmp reply from that
router, it won't register. The ttl still gets decremented and the packet
dropped, the tracing station then sends another icmp packet with a ttl of
one hop past the previous. If that router is answering icmp requests, it
ramov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 12:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: traceroute [7:19963]
sometimes when I do a traceroute it skeeps some routers. Is there any
way to adjusst time out or something to get traceroute to show all the
routers that packet is
our administrative control.
>
>BJ
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: khramov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 12:06 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: traceroute [7:19963]
>
>
>sometimes when I do a traceroute it skeeps some r
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: traceroute [7:19963]
At 01:14 PM 9/14/01, Wilson, Bradley wrote:
>What you're seeing isn't a problem related to timeouts. Essentially, all a
>"trace" is is a series of regular ICMP pings with incremening TTL fields.
Agreed, but just wanted t
de some of
their internal hops.
Gotta run.
Priscilla
>-Original Message-
>From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 1:57 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: traceroute [7:19963]
>
>
>At 01:14 PM 9/14/01, Wi
6 matches
Mail list logo
