can any body tell,
why we need spanning tree protocol per vlan
and vtp why it is needed what purpose it serves
thnx in advance
jd
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.c
in a broadcast domain - which is defined in a switching environment (though
not always) by a VLAN. Thus spanning tree reduces this potential per VLAN. I
am sure there a myriad of other reasons..:)
VTP: one of the reasons is bandwidth - your access-links (that is links
between switches ) may becom
My message for STP should have mentioned: Broadcast loops and bridge table
corruption in a broadcast domain.
""Oliver Nadalin"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> in a broadcast domain - which is defined in a switching environment
(though
> not always) by a VLAN.
At 02:13 PM 8/5/01, Cisco Troubleshooter wrote:
>can any body tell,
>
>why we need spanning tree protocol per vlan
If you have a large, switched network, all the switches are in the same
spanning tree. Converging the spanning tree can take a long time. In
addition, traffic flow may not be optim
Priscilla is of course correct - i looked at only one aspect/benefit of VTP.
OSN
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> At 02:13 PM 8/5/01, Cisco Troubleshooter wrote:
> >can any body tell,
> >
> >why we need spanning tree protocol per vlan
>
>
PROTECTED]
Oggetto: Re: vtp, spanning tree [7:14961]
At 02:13 PM 8/5/01, Cisco Troubleshooter wrote:
>can any body tell,
>
>why we need spanning tree protocol per vlan
If you have a large, switched network, all the switches are in the same
spanning tree. Converging the spanning tree can ta
e a good day!!
fa
- Original Message -
From: "Picciani Francesco Saverio"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 5:09 PM
Subject: R: vtp, spanning tree [7:14961]
> I thing that the main benefit of having per-VLAN spanning tree is that a
> problem on a VLAN does not impact the o
gt; ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Picciani Francesco Saverio"
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 5:09 PM
> Subject: R: vtp, spanning tree [7:14961]
>
>
> > I thing that the main benefit of having per-VLAN spanning tree is that a
> > problem
Yes, the selection of the root bridge does affect traffic flow.
>i dont think so..
>also if u can define the data flow in the network
>with and without vlan
>
>regards
>
>
>have a good day!!
>
>fa
>
>- Original Message -----
>From: "Picciani Francesco
ut I just wanted to add on a bit.
Priscilla
>-Messaggio originale-
>Da: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Inviato: lunedl 6 agosto 2001 20.05
>A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Oggetto: Re: vtp, spanning tree [7:14961]
>
>
>At 02:13 PM 8/5/01, Cisco Troubleshoo
PROTECTED]]
Inviato: martedl 7 agosto 2001 20.02
A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oggetto: Re: R: vtp, spanning tree [7:14961]
At 02:53 PM 8/7/01, Picciani Francesco Saverio wrote:
>I thing that the main benefit of having per-VLAN spanning tree is that a
>problem on a VLAN does not impact the other VLAN
Ns continue to work even if they share the same trunk.
>
>-Messaggio originale-
>Da: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Inviato: martedl 7 agosto 2001 20.02
>A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Oggetto: Re: R: vtp, spanning tree [7:14961]
>
>
>At 02:53 PM 8/7/01
k it's an important concept that gets lost in the hoopla around
per-VLAN spanning tree.
Priscilla
>-Messaggio originale-
>Da: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Inviato: martedl 7 agosto 2001 20.02
>A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Oggetto: Re: R: vtp, spanning tr
13 matches
Mail list logo
