Hi,
we just moved one of our NMS behind an ASA firewall. So far, most
everything works, but we've noticed a certain amount of dropped/lost
packets ever since we did. I assume it's some kind of throttling on the
ASA side, as it affects things like Smokeping, which sends out a short
burst of pac
Hi Atif,
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 22:52 -0500, Atif Sid wrote:
> I have a static route configured with Higher admin distance, intially
> BGP route does does not install int routing table. after a flap in BGP
> table the static route starts preferring, although the BGP AD is lower
> then Static ro
Masood Ahmad Shah <> wrote on Monday, February 04, 2008 11:47 PM:
> Is there any low end Cisco router for the multipoint L2TPV3 tunnel to
> configure MPLS VPN over IP Tunnel. I just can't buy Cisco 12000 only
> for the multipoint L2TPV3 tunnel. I was expecting a support of
> "tunnel mode l2tpv3" i
Atif Sid <> wrote on Tuesday, February 05, 2008 4:53 AM:
> I have a static route configured with Higher admin distance, intially
> BGP route does does not install int routing table. after a flap in
> BGP table the static route starts preferring, although the BGP AD is
> lower then Static route whi
I have a static route configured with Higher admin distance, intially BGP
route does does not install int routing table. after a flap in BGP table the
static route starts preferring, although the BGP AD is lower then Static
route which is 210.
any insight is appereciated.
PE3#sh ip bgp vpnv4 vrf
Yes sorry Pete your right, I was thinking of the HWIC-1ADSL when I
wrote you need 12.4T and copying in 12.3(8)T from the
WIC-1ADSL...sigh, so yes a plain WIC-1ADSL should be mainline in 12.4,
need more zzz :)
On 05/02/2008, at 12:28 PM, Pete Templin wrote:
> Ben Steele wrote:
>> Oh and
Pete,
Correct
And everyonce in a while x.y+1(1) has an additional feature that x.y(last)T
didn't get. There is a real scary chart on the website about this.
David
--
http://dcp.dcptech.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete T
Ben Steele wrote:
> Oh and in regards to actaully getting it show up, you need a T train
> IOS, 12.3(8)T and on..
Ok, I'm going to throw the "huh?" flag here. It's been my understanding
for years that x.yT becomes x.(y+1) mainline, and on that date the
following things happen:
x.(y+1) inheri
> > I did try with an ethernet link between PE and CE, and bfd config looks
> > good.
>
> Unless you're Ethernet links are 1Q trunks like what you'd have between
> a site with a pair of redundant routers doing both L3 and access layer
> connections (FHRPs). SRC removed BFD on SVI support, as did S
Oh and in regards to actaully getting it show up, you need a T train
IOS, 12.3(8)T and on..
On 05/02/2008, at 8:35 AM, Adam Greene wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just got a WIC-1ADSL and put it into my 2801 (IOS 12.4(16)). No
> lights, no logs, no nothing. I understand these cards are supported
> on th
You can install your WIC into slot 1-3, slot 0 is the only one
reserved for VIC only, slot 2 is VIC or WIC and 1/3 are HWIC and
backwards compatible with WIC.
Ben
On 05/02/2008, at 9:53 AM, Tom Storey wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just got a WIC-1ADSL and put it into my 2801 (IOS 12.4(16)). No
>>
Opps I meant PA-MC-T3 interface cards. Silly me.
On 2/4/08, Joseph Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> I have 2 PA-2T3+ at the end of a DS3. I am currently having to split all
> the t1's off of it and then reform them in a MPPP bundle. Is there anyway
> around this with those i
> Hi,
>
> I just got a WIC-1ADSL and put it into my 2801 (IOS 12.4(16)). No lights,
> no logs, no nothing. I understand these cards are supported on the 2801.
> The part number of the WIC is 73-477108 B0.
>
> Is anyone aware of compatibility issues with these cards? Maybe it's just
> a bad card (or
Is the CSM client vlan 'gateway' entry for 10.11.11.0/24 pointing to
new_int or old_int? If old_int, what about setting it to new_int and
leave the FWSM default gateway pointing to old_int?
If the CSM gateway is old_int, a change to new_int will likely affect
the existing connections too, b
> Whatever you're smoking, take two puffs and pass it to the left. If the
> device has an SFP port, of course its compatible with GLC-BX.
Richard, can I quote you on this? Better yet, send me your billing
address just in case ;)
-- Stephen
___
cisco-
Cisco DSL Router Configuration and Troubleshooting Guide - PPPoE: DSL
Router as a PPPoE Client Troubleshooting
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk175/tk15/technologies_configuration_example09186a008071a7c2.shtml
I don't think it is a NAT table overflow issue. If you really think
that this is the pr
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 04:14:26PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Can anyone confirm is the RSP720 is compatible with the GLC-BX-D/-U SFP?
> The new 10GE RSP720 is, but I'm referring to the original gigabit version.
> I checked with our Cisco SE, and the answer was a non-answer.
It is very clear your Cisco DSL route sends PPPoE Active Discovery
Initiation (PADI) frames to the ISP with no response. The PADI frame is the
first in a series of PPPoE call-setup frames. If your ISP does not respond
with a PPPoE Active Discovery Offer (PADO), PPPoE negotiation does not
succeed. T
Hey all,
I'm currently planning an IP migration, and one of the issues I'm going to
hit and I'm not sure of the way around it... traffic coming into new_int
will get translated from 192.168.2.1 -> 10.10.10.1, however as the default
route on the FWSM point out via old_int it won't get passed throug
Hi Brandon,
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 11:34 -0600, Brandon Ewing wrote:
> Can anyone here provide thoughts / suggestions regarding the version of
> IOS for the 3750 platform that has the least problems, and offers the
> most stability? Featureset is not an issue, as layer 3 functions are
> not re
Is there any low end Cisco router for the multipoint L2TPV3 tunnel to
configure MPLS VPN over IP Tunnel. I just can't buy Cisco 12000 only for the
multipoint L2TPV3 tunnel. I was expecting a support of "tunnel mode l2tpv3"
in Cisco 7500 but I just can't see it. :(
Regards,
Masood Ahmad Shah
Hey all,
I have 2 PA-2T3+ at the end of a DS3. I am currently having to split all
the t1's off of it and then reform them in a MPPP bundle. Is there anyway
around this with those interface cards?
Its not a full DS3 as a few channels are split off for voice but I'd like to
take all the remaining
Is there any low end Cisco router for the multipoint L2TPV3 tunnel to
configure MPLS VPN over IP Tunnel. I just can't buy Cisco 12000 only for the
multipoint L2TPV3 tunnel. I was expecting a support of "tunnel mode l2tpv3"
in Cisco 7500 but I just can't see it. :(
Regards,
Masood Ahmad Shah
Hi Eddie,
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 10:07 -0500, Alwis Edward-C22562 wrote:
> How could I read the email trail to understand what was the issue here.
> I only see the mail below.
You can look in the archives, which can be found here:
http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
The thread started in
Hi,
I just got a WIC-1ADSL and put it into my 2801 (IOS 12.4(16)). No lights, no
logs, no nothing. I understand these cards are supported on the 2801. The part
number of the WIC is 73-477108 B0.
Is anyone aware of compatibility issues with these cards? Maybe it's just a bad
card (or a bad slo
Duracom Lists wrote:
> Arie thanks for the information. I have another thing before I make a
> decision. I have my network setup as follows:
>
> 7206VXR
> Int f0/0 has several (50 or so) /28 subnets
>
> F0/0 <> 2950 port 1
>
> Now if I had a L3 Switch (in place of the 2950) can an int
K,
I suggest we go a step back here. Can you explain why do you have some
many small subnets? What is the network objective and design?
Arie
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Duracom Lists
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 23:47 PM
To: cisco
Arie thanks for the information. I have another thing before I make a
decision. I have my network setup as follows:
7206VXR
Int f0/0 has several (50 or so) /28 subnets
F0/0 <> 2950 port 1
Now if I had a L3 Switch (in place of the 2950) can an interface on an L3
switch have multiple
Hi all,
Can anyone confirm is the RSP720 is compatible with the GLC-BX-D/-U SFP?
The new 10GE RSP720 is, but I'm referring to the original gigabit version.
I checked with our Cisco SE, and the answer was a non-answer. The SFP
compatibility matrix's, as well as the release notes for SRA and SRB
I just broke down and bought a pcmci CF adapter for my laptop.
Format your CF card in a router first, then copy away. It is very handy.
--
Colin McNamara
(858)208-8105
CCIE #18233,RHCE,GCIH
http://www.colinmcnamara.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/colinmcnamara
"The difficult we do immediately, t
tabor Ivan's wrote:
> I thought just the same before we get burnt by this issue. So I am
> afraid this doesn't work like this(but I am far from to be sure...)
>
> Router A
> - has "customer" network x.x.x.0 as connected
> - connected to transit network t.t.t.0 with address t.t.t.a
> - loopback: a.
Just to be clear, the 3750, 3750G, 3750E, or the 3750ME?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brandon Ewing
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 11:35 AM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] 3750 software stability
Can anyone here p
=) It's for the reasons you've already desecribed (even though you're in a
good position now) that I detest USB to serial adapters. Just lost too many
hours because of them and lengthened existing downtime.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Jon Lewis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday
Yes, I did use the USB function on the last pair of 3640's. The old one in
the pair didn't have USB support, so I used the USB key on the new 3640 to
load the newest firmware and ROM, copied that over to a CF card, then used
that CF card in the old 3640 to load the new firmware and apply the ROM
u
I have a 3640A with a WIC1-ADSL residing in an NM-1FE1R2W. IOS is
12.4(13b)
Periodically, about every month or two, the dsl link will drop and
debugging output shows:
... Sending PADI: vc=0/35
... padi timer expired
Doing a shut no shut on atm2/0 seems to bring the line up back up and it
then wo
Luan Nguyen wrote:
> I did try with an ethernet link between PE and CE, and bfd config looks
> good.
Unless you're Ethernet links are 1Q trunks like what you'd have between
a site with a pair of redundant routers doing both L3 and access layer
connections (FHRPs). SRC removed BFD on SVI support
do you have "logging event link-status" on the interfaces?
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, William wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a Cisco 4500 running 12.1 IOS code.
>
> It would seem we are not getting up/down port events in the log
> buffer, to setup logging we have:
>
> logging source-interface Vlan1
> logging
Can anyone here provide thoughts / suggestions regarding the version of IOS
for the 3750 platform that has the least problems, and offers the most
stability? Featureset is not an issue, as layer 3 functions are not
required, just QoS/LACP.
--
Brandon Ewing
Hi William,
Did you configure something like "logging buffered 40960 debugging" ?
You're nou logging towards a syslog server.
Koen
William wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a Cisco 4500 running 12.1 IOS code.
>
> It would seem we are not getting up/down port events in the log
> buffer, to setup logging
Make sure on the interfaces you want to monitor, you have
'logging event link-status'
Ken Matlock
Network Analyst
(303) 467-4671
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 10:32 AM
To: [c-nsp
I have bgp running between PE and CE.
So on the PE, you do:
router bgp
address-family ipv4 vrf whatever
neighbor y.y.y.y fall-over bfd
Do the same for the CE under bgp.
Then on the link between CE and PE, configured the bfd interval...etc. That
should work.
The problem is my CE is a 1841 wit
Hi,
I have a Cisco 4500 running 12.1 IOS code.
It would seem we are not getting up/down port events in the log
buffer, to setup logging we have:
logging source-interface Vlan1
logging 192.168.1.1
we did set the logging buffer to informational (this doesnt show in
show run for some reason?), thi
Don't do that then! :)
Show run is pretty processor-intensive. Show tech is also
processor-intensive, but is asking for a lot more information, so it's
going to keep the CPU high for a longer period. Are you running these
through a vty port, or console? Console is usually worse, since it's
u
I think the line between router and L3 switch is just about gone now,
with everything moving to Ethernet. The choice of devices is
dependent on what you need in terms of route capacity, port density,
and high-touch features. I've seen wireless networks implemented
using VPLS services, wh
Speaking of, does anyone know what happened to Blue Console? There website
won't let you order and the emails go unanswered.
Aaron
On Feb 4, 2008 10:26 AM, Doug McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 08:43:16AM -0600, Justin Shore wrote:
> > Forgive me for hijacking the th
Hi,
Anyone have configured VRF aware BFD? If yes pls let me know how?
Regards
Vikas Sharma
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Duracom Lists <> wrote on Monday, February 04, 2008 4:43 PM:
> We run a fairly large Wireless Internet service. Right now my
> network is all switched/bridged and is time to route this network. I
> have 8 Radios at my main location that are connected to the segments
> of our network. Currently a
K,
If you need L3 with many Ethernet ports a L3 switch would be just what
you need.
Be aware that these switches use hardware resources for L3 forwarding,
so you may need to choose the right model. This is especially relevant
if you plan for example to run a full internet BGP table (look at
7600/6
William,
If you use PIM sparse mode you need to have a valid RP.
If its only this router, then just configure "ip pim rp "
Another idea is to use PIM SSM, as you use static joins anyway.
Arie
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William
Sent
I believe it's normal for cpu to go high when having long cli outputs.
Nevertheless, you shouldn't worry because the Virtual Exec process should be
(is ?) of low priority.
--
Tassos
Jorge Evangelista wrote on 4/2/2008 5:08 μμ:
> Hi list,
>
> I I have some issues with a router Cisco 871, it hav
We run a fairly large Wireless Internet service. Right now my network is
all switched/bridged and is time to route this network. I have 8 Radios at
my main location that are connected to the segments of our network.
Currently all these 8 Radios Ethernet ports plug into a 2950 switch with 1
port o
ip dhcp pool 0
import all
network 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 10.0.0.1
dns-server
interface fa 0/0
description NAT_OUTSIDE
ip address negotiated
ip nat outside
interface fa 0/1
description NAT_INSIDE
ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
ip nat inside sou
Hia,
ip multicast-routing is enabled in global config.
Regards,
W
On 04/02/2008, Ziv Leyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First, I must ask this, did you make sure you have the global command "ip
> multicast-routing"
> Then on every interface you want to participate, you better use "ip pim
> sp
Hi,
Finally got Multilink PPP to work with ADSL (1841 IOS 12.4(17)). Configs
below. They're based on getting "direct pvc's" from Verizon.
When I take down either one of the ATM interfaces, the entire multilink
bundle seems to go down for about a minute.
I wonder if I can prevent this. I'm thin
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 08:43:16AM -0600, Justin Shore wrote:
> Forgive me for hijacking the thread but it's a related topic.
>
> Does anyone have any positive experiences with Bluetooth console
> adapters? They could easily eliminate most of the serial port woes. I
> bought a BlueConsole adap
First, I must ask this, did you make sure you have the global command "ip
multicast-routing"
Then on every interface you want to participate, you better use "ip pim
sparse-dense-mode"
Ziv
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William
Sent: Mond
Hi list,
I I have some issues with a router Cisco 871, it have two VPNs with GRE
to others 871 routers, I realise me that when I execute "show run" or "show
tech-support" (it delays) the cpu process in my router reach 99%, the
problem seems the process Virtual Exec, I have seen that it adds 95%
Not Bluetooth related...
It's been my experience that you can fix usage of the same COM port on
XP laptops by plugging the adapter into each USB port in turn and then
using Device Manager to set the COM port being used to one that you
know isn't used by something else.
That way, no matter which
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008, Casey Mills wrote:
> I am new to Cisco and trying to get started. I have a 2611 router
> with a couple ethernet ports to get started. I would like to set it
> up for home use. DHCP client on one port, DHCP server on the other,
> and NATing. Can someone point me to a webs
List
I am new to Cisco and trying to get started. I have a 2611 router
with a couple ethernet ports to get started. I would like to set it
up for home use. DHCP client on one port, DHCP server on the other,
and NATing. Can someone point me to a website or send me a config.
I would eventua
Forgive me for hijacking the thread but it's a related topic.
Does anyone have any positive experiences with Bluetooth console
adapters? They could easily eliminate most of the serial port woes. I
bought a BlueConsole adapter well over a year ago but due to Microsoft
screwing up XP's Bluetoot
Daniel Hooper wrote:
> Sorry.. I just realised it was only a few platforms of routers that
> support the tftp from console commands, I did once manage to upgrade the
> boot rom on a 3640 to support it, it required a chip puller, some steady
> hands and a new boot rom chip. (read: not for the faint
From: Tim Franklin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 2/4/2008 8:10 PM
To: Daniel Hooper
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] USB to serial converter
On Mon, February 4, 2008 7:59 am, Daniel Hooper wrote:
> Maybe just a local Ethernet port whi
On 2/3/08, Frank Bulk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is why on another listserv's short list of "tools for techs to have", a
> laptop with a real serial port was near the top of everyone's list. In our
> workplace that's a requirement for any tech laptop we buy. We've wasted way
> to much time
Hi Gabor,
Yes, I see now, like Christopher describes. If you have a split to A can
see C, C can see A and B and B can see C, and it's on a broadcast media
like Ethernet, with a single DR, then you have the problem.
If would be nice if you could use specific "neighbor" statements and
something lik
Peter Rathlev wrote:
When
the Dead Interval expires, it will think of the neighbor as down and
invalidate all routes learned from it. Only the still connected network
is left and announced, but since there are no other OSPF routers on that
segment (seen from each of the two) no paths are learned
On Mon, February 4, 2008 11:32 am, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> No, they aren't. What they are doing is blocking well-known
> ports. But anything above port 1024 has to be open.
>
> config t
>
> line vty 0
> rotary
>
> Now you can telnet to port 3000+
Good point, and a handy tip.
I still find s
Hi,
> Or maybe Cisco could just catch up with the rest of the world and do
> away with serial ports seeing as it's difficult to get a laptop or PC
> with a serial port built in.
no. keep the serial port. but put it on the front! ;-)
alan
___
cisco-nsp
hi,
we use the keyspan USB to serial adapters.
single port and quad port flavours. very nice.
(though I did have to sort out a Linux bug in the
2.6.17 era as they'd changed some basic USB
handshake stuff)
very capable at proper serial speeds too - handy once
you'v configured the cisco device t
Hi,
We have a 4500+SUP4 running 12.1.19 EW1, running IOS throughout.
We have a requirement to push multicast packets from VLAN200 (routed)
to VLAN1 (routed, VLAN1 used because of legacy issues).
On both VLAN interfaces we have ip pim sparse mode enabled, and have
also added join statements to tr
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tim Franklin
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 3:11 AM
> To: Daniel Hooper
> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] USB to serial converter
>
>
> On Mon, February 4, 2008 7:59 am, Daniel Hoo
Hi,
it most likely depends on the interface you are trying to rate-limiting
rather than the IOS. On FlexWANs you can use CAR; you can't on SPAs and
Sup720/RSP720 upstream interfaces.
Btw, why don't you like policing via MQC? It simply works well and it's
supported on pretty much all the current
On Mon, February 4, 2008 7:59 am, Daniel Hooper wrote:
> Maybe just a local Ethernet port which has a hard coded IP address on it
> that cannot be modified? Or an lcd display on your router/switch that
> allows configuration of an ip address to manage the device?
Which I can connect to via an ine
On (2008-02-04 09:33 +0200), Ciprian Radu wrote:
> On another equipment I saw the rate-limit command used on interfaces and
> I need to do the same thing (as using police maps just to rate limit
> traffic doesn't seem like best practice).
Yet it is. 'rate-limit' under iface hasn't even worked
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Adrian Chadd
Sent: Mon 2/4/2008 7:09 PM
To: Daniel Hooper
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] USB to serial converter
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008, Daniel Hooper wrote:
> The more I think about it the more I can see the has
Hello,
I have a Cisco 7606 Cisco router RSP 720 and have a quite simple
question to ask.
On another equipment I saw the rate-limit command used on interfaces and
I need to do the same thing (as using police maps just to rate limit
traffic doesn't seem like best practice).
But unfortunately
Yes you can, you can even boot your IOS from a usb drive (although it
wasn't supported some time ago even though possible, not sure of
current support status).
On 04/02/2008, at 7:02 PM, Daniel Hooper wrote:
> Sorry.. I just realised it was only a few platforms of routers that
> support the t
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008, Daniel Hooper wrote:
> Sorry.. I just realised it was only a few platforms of routers that
> support the tftp from console commands, I did once manage to upgrade the
> boot rom on a 3640 to support it, it required a chip puller, some steady
> hands and a new boot rom chip. (re
Sorry.. I just realised it was only a few platforms of routers that
support the tftp from console commands, I did once manage to upgrade the
boot rom on a 3640 to support it, it required a chip puller, some steady
hands and a new boot rom chip. (read: not for the faint hearted)
I also just realise
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008, Daniel Hooper wrote:
> Tftpdnld from the console if your device supports it, takes the pain
> away.
.. only if the rom monitor or internal IOS supports a network interface. ;)
I'm guessing thats not so much of a problem with stuff today, but
in the past, I have fond memories
Tftpdnld from the console if your device supports it, takes the pain
away.
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Chadd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 4 February 2008 5:10 PM
To: Daniel Hooper
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] USB to serial converter
On Mon, Feb 04, 20
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008, Daniel Hooper wrote:
> The more I think about it the more I can see the hassles in it, no
> password resets, no uploading of boot images in case you lose the
> running image.. but surely there is something better out there then
> serial console port? Anyone got any ideas'?
S
82 matches
Mail list logo
