Re: [c-nsp] mpls mtu / ip mtu / ospf

Gerald, This could be a good starting point: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2sb/feature/guide/newmtu.html Arie -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gerald Krause Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 18:22 PM To: cisco-nsp Subject: [c-nsp]

Re: [c-nsp] mpls mtu / ip mtu / ospf

Arie Vayner (avayner) schrieb: Gerald, This could be a good starting point: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2sb/feature/guide/newmtu.html Thx Arie. I think now that I should prefer the mtu+ip mtu solution to the one with mpls mtu override. -- Gerald (ax/tc)

[c-nsp] Question regarding 1220B and the G upgrade kit

Im looking at buying a 1220B AP, and Ive read that there is a G upgrade kit available which is good news, for more reasons than just the increased bandwidth. From what I gather, the 1220B only supports WPA/TKIP at best, however, with the G upgrade it now supports WPA2/AES, something that I would

Re: [c-nsp] Question regarding 1220B and the G upgrade kit

On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 18:25 +0900, Tom Storey wrote: Im looking at buying a 1220B AP, and Ive read that there is a G upgrade kit available which is good news, for more reasons than just the increased bandwidth. We did a few of these, but it was a long time ago. Check that you can still get

Re: [c-nsp] NPE-G1 support for jumbo frames

Can someone send me the output when they try to set it? It will save me time from having to set it up in the lab. Rodney On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 12:13:08PM -0700, Lasher, Donn wrote: -Original Message- From: Adam Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NPE-G1

Re: [c-nsp] BGP - hiding AS

Hello All Well, my Provider does not support remove-private-as or as-override. So how can we do this now? Any ideas? Gary On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Gary Roberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have the following topology Router 1(AS65501) - Router 2 (AS123) - Router 3 (AS456) - Router4

Re: [c-nsp] IOS pirating requests

On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 9:15 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How do you do an IOS upgrade? :) Phase 1: log into your router Phase 2: type no ip retard Phase 3: PROFIT! HTH, NC, HAND.[1] :P --Adam [1] What, exactly, is this upgrade[2] [2] Y'all already covered What's {IOS|an operating

Re: [c-nsp] BGP - hiding AS

On R3 create an aggregate for the networks so they are advertised with only the local as to R4. You can create two /25's for one /24 if you can't do a larger aggregate. David -- http://dcp.dcptech.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

Re: [c-nsp] IOS pirating requests

You forgot some steps. 1) Login 2) type 'reload in 5' 3) configure t 4) config-register 0x0 5) end 6) write erase It won't let you reload after config-reg is set to 0 but if you schedule the reload in the future, it'll work fine. -

Re: [c-nsp] IOS pirating requests

1 - log into router 2 - type write erase 3 - reload Upgrade and perfect security all at once ;-} Adam Korab wrote: On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 9:15 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How do you do an IOS upgrade? :) Phase 1: log into your router Phase 2: type no ip retard Phase 3:

Re: [c-nsp] BGP - hiding AS

On 03/04/2008, Gary Roberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello All Well, my Provider does not support remove-private-as or as-override. So how can we do this now? Any ideas? gre is your friend - do the r2 need to know about your networks? can you do the remove-private-as on r3 -- -mat

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 and WIC-1DSU-T1.

Support for the WIC-1DSU-T1 was added with 11.2(12)P for some platforms, 11.3(3)T for most others and 12 for all platforms consistently. Support for the V2 version was added with 12.3(1) and 12.2(17) Mainline trains. Support for the 2800 ISRs emerged with 12.3(8)T. That said you should have

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 and WIC-1DSU-T1.

The WIC-1DSU-T1 is not supported in a 2811 you need to use a WIC-1DSU-T1-V2 On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 5:06 PM, virendra rode // [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Just wondering if anyone is running 2811 with WIC-1DSU-T1, if so what version of ios

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 and WIC-1DSU-T1.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe you need a WIC-1DSU-T1-V2 in a 2800. Regards, Matt On 4/3/08 5:06 PM, virendra rode // [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Just wondering if anyone is running 2811 with WIC-1DSU-T1, if so what version of

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 and WIC-1DSU-T1.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Justin Shore wrote: I should have thought of that. :-( http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps5854/prod_qas0900aecd80169bd6.html Justin - --- Bummer because I thought I read somewhere that someone was

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 and WIC-1DSU-T1.

Yeah, and I was thinking I had a v1 working in an ISR too but I can't find one. V2s are better anyway. Justin virendra rode // wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Justin Shore wrote: I should have thought of that. :-(

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 and WIC-1DSU-T1.

I'm not sure i'd say better all the time, i had a recent issue where i had a circuit work in v1 card but not on a V2 card the v2 have less of a tolerance for poor wiring and some smartjack configs. On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Justin Shore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, and I was thinking I

[c-nsp] Speed limitations - RF problem or IP ?

Hello, Does anyone know what the best things to do when you have speed problems with cable modems in different downstream/upstream? This is the scenario: uBR 10K with about 17000 customers. Each downstream is configured with 256qam and all upstream have 16qam of modulation. In some cases the

Re: [c-nsp] Speed limitations - RF problem or IP ?

This might not be a good suggestion but have you thought of knocking down modulation temporarily to see if anything changes? I know you're saying SNR and FEC are fine but it might be worth trying Paul -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

[c-nsp] OT: Check Point v Cisco PIX (ASA 5500 Series)

Hi All I wonder if anyone can offer me some sound professional opinion in terms of using a Check Point FW device v Cisco PIX (ASA 5500 Series) Devices. Currently we are using Checkpoint Devices however, I have an opportunity to possible include a pix device in our mix, however all my reading

Re: [c-nsp] IOS pirating requests

But if you send me the chassis as well as the IOS and no money changes hand's it's technically not pirating. :) -Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Rathlev Sent: Wednesday, 2 April 2008 8:18 PM To: Jon Lewis Cc:

Re: [c-nsp] Speed limitations - RF problem or IP ?

It will be difficult to attain the ~38 Mbps of downstream if you're shared with other usershave you tested this on an unused downstream and upstream port in the head end? Frank -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miguel Sent: Thursday,

Re: [c-nsp] BGP - hiding AS

I like that idea. I'm going to do that for a similar type thing. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mateusz Blaszczyk Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 2:54 PM To: Gary Roberton Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re:

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 and WIC-1DSU-T1.

Don't forget that with the V2 card you must explicitly specify channel speed to be 64K in order for bring up a T1. It's no longer the default... Joe McGuckin ViaNet Communications [EMAIL PROTECTED] 650-207-0372 cell 650-213-1302 office 650-969-2124 fax On Apr 3, 2008, at 3:55 PM, Ben

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 2811 and WIC-1DSU-T1.

On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 04:38:53PM -0500, Justin Shore wrote: Support for the WIC-1DSU-T1 was added with 11.2(12)P for some platforms, 11.3(3)T for most others and 12 for all platforms consistently. Support for the V2 version was added with 12.3(1) and 12.2(17) Mainline trains. Support