[c-nsp] Cisco support for ASNv4 (4 byte ASN)

2008-05-05 Thread Skeeve Stevens
Hey all, Can someone let me know if/when Cisco supports 4byte AS Numbers in BGP in the current IOS stream (not XR or XE). .Skeeve -- Skeeve Stevens, RHCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.skeeve.org Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 / skype://skeeve eintellego - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.eintellego.net --

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco support for ASNv4 (4 byte ASN)

2008-05-05 Thread Marco Huggenberger
Hi Skeeve 2008/5/5 Skeeve Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Can someone let me know if/when Cisco supports 4byte AS Numbers in BGP in the current IOS stream (not XR or XE). 12.5T late 2008 in the meantime use AS23456 ;) Cheers Marco PS: Good starting point for ASN32 compatiblity is my

[c-nsp] Input queue drops due to backplane congestion

2008-05-05 Thread mack
We have a 6509 with sup720 3bxl running SXF11. We have a number of 6704-10GE line cards and A number of 6748-GE-TX line cards all with PFC3BXLs. When one (only one) of the 6704 fabric channels peaks at about 80% utilization coming from the fabric we start to See packet loss on the GigE ports.

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco support for ASNv4 (4 byte ASN)

2008-05-05 Thread Mark Tinka
On Monday 05 May 2008, Skeeve Stevens wrote: Hey all, Can someone let me know if/when Cisco supports 4byte AS Numbers in BGP in the current IOS stream (not XR or XE). According to http://www.swissix.ch/asn32/doku.php, it's meant to be mid this year for 12.5T - you might want to check

[c-nsp] Policing with DFCs

2008-05-05 Thread Wyatt Mattias Ishmael Jovial Gyllenvarg
Hi We are trying too police in a 7600 on the output on a Te interface. After some fiddling I must ask, is there a workaround for the cir * DFCs problem. There is no need for high precision, just a rough working sollution. Best regards Mattias Gyllenvarg Skycom AB

[c-nsp] cisco slb ace and snmp OID

2008-05-05 Thread Donato Dunguihual Morales
Hi, I need to graph with mrtg or rrdtool, real servers and server farm info for cisco application control engine module. Anyone have information about the most popular oid that can be measured and polled through snmp?. I've been looking in the web for specifc oid without results. For

Re: [c-nsp] 2801 - can it handle this?

2008-05-05 Thread Michael Malitsky
Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 00:36:01 -0500 From: Dan Letkeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [c-nsp] 2801 - can it handle this? To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello, I have a 2801 router with the firewall IOS. I

[c-nsp] Getting BGP peer route information using SNMP

2008-05-05 Thread Diogo Montagner
Hi All, I was asking me if is there a way to get routes information from a BGP peer using SNMP ? In other words, I would like to get the output of command: show ip bgp neighbor x.y.z.w advertised-routes using a snmpwalk. I checked the BGP MIBv1 and MIBv2 of Cisco but I couldn't find the

[c-nsp] MPLS - 6500's

2008-05-05 Thread Paul Stewart
This is a topic that has come up on the mailing list several times including from myself..;) Hopefully a simple question (been reading the archives for a couple of hours now). With a 6500 Catalyst, regular line cards, and Sup720-3BXL - what can you NOT do with MPLS on these chassis? Is it just

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - 6500's

2008-05-05 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Mon, 5 May 2008, Paul Stewart wrote: With a 6500 Catalyst, regular line cards, and Sup720-3BXL - what can you NOT do with MPLS on these chassis? Is it just VPLS that requires an OSM card or a FlexWAN card for example? We are working on a project where MPLS may come into play .. VPLS

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - 6500's

2008-05-05 Thread Phil Bedard
What exactly are you trying to do with MPLS? PFC3 will support most things without additional modules (OSM,SIP) with the most notable exception being local switching. You can get around that by looping in and out of the box if you need to. No VPLS as well, but I'm not too keen on

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - 6500's

2008-05-05 Thread Phil Bedard
There are no restrictions for MPLS on the SUP2/MSFC2 since it's completely unsupported. :) You need an OSM to do MPLS on those platforms. Phil On May 5, 2008, at 4:39 PM, Justin M. Streiner wrote: On Mon, 5 May 2008, Paul Stewart wrote: With a 6500 Catalyst, regular line cards, and

[c-nsp] Nexus 7000

2008-05-05 Thread Justin C. Darby
Anyone on this list using the N7K platform in production anywhere? We've got a pretty good size 10GbE SAN solution in place and we're looking to consolidate our overall switching environment. I'm just checking up to see if anyone has gotten a hold of one, and if they've had any problems so

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - 6500's

2008-05-05 Thread Phil Bedard
You may want to look at L2TPv3 unless you really need TE features. It's supported on more platforms and supported in non 'T' train releases. Phil On May 5, 2008, at 4:52 PM, Paul Stewart wrote: Thanks... So if someone wanted to build a low traffic volume, bare bones MPLS network could

Re: [c-nsp] Getting BGP peer route information using SNMP

2008-05-05 Thread Aaron Glenn
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Diogo Montagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I was asking me if is there a way to get routes information from a BGP peer using SNMP ? It's been a while but I believe 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.187.1.2.1.1.4 will do the trick for you. *should* be supported on your

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS - 6500's

2008-05-05 Thread Paul Stewart
Thanks , yeah looking at that too. ;) Does anyone know the lowest hardware support for l2tpv3 as what I've found on Cisco's website references pretty large gear so far... Paul -Original Message- From: Phil Bedard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 7:16 PM To:

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco support for ASNv4 (4 byte ASN)

2008-05-05 Thread Mark Tinka
On Monday 05 May 2008, Marco Huggenberger wrote: 12.5T late 2008 in the meantime use AS23456 ;) From the other side of the pond, J recently released 9.1, which now introduces support for 4-byte ASN's to their mainstream platforms. Cheers, Mark. signature.asc Description: This is a

[c-nsp] VPN/QOS Questions Was MPLS - 6500's

2008-05-05 Thread Paul Stewart
Oops.. overlooked it in the software advisor. According to Cisco.com l2tpv3 is supported even in the 1811's... So, what QOS levels can I invoke with l2tpv3 if the packets are tunneled? In other words, is there a way to mark voice packets inside of l2tpv3 tunnels across a core network to another

Re: [c-nsp] 2801 - can it handle this?

2008-05-05 Thread Michael Malitsky
The specific example I referenced was 12.4. I no longer have the records available to show the exact train/revision. Most recently I had problems on an 1800 with 12.4.18a (also tried 12.4.3, 12.4.19. 12.4.18a was TAC's recommendation). Michael -Original Message- From: Fred Reimer

Re: [c-nsp] VPN/QOS Questions Was MPLS - 6500's

2008-05-05 Thread Fred Reimer
The VoIP packets should be marked normally at the ingress port to the network. This is most likely the port on the switch that the phone is plugged into, or on the switch the router is plugged into. You may find it difficult to classify and mark traffic on the (sub) interfaces on which you