On Thursday 12 June 2008, Paolo Lucente wrote:
> Full featured QoS is there. IHMO, there is
> an interesting option of running the 12.2SR train onto
> it.
Yeah, but be careful if you're looking at SRC.
While comprehensive, it's riddled with bugs left, right and
centre.
We've tried it in some p
Hi Darryl,
many thanks. This was exactly my doubt.
Some days ago I was trying to identify prepends using regular
expressions without knowing the AS.
Regards,
./diogo -montagner
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:47 PM, Darryl Dunkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You would have to specify the AS, as usi
You would have to specify the AS, as using wildcard digits won't
identify repetition.
If you had 500 500 500 400, or 500 500 400 400, where 500 was connected
to you: ^500(_500)*(_400)*$
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Diogo Montagner
Sent:
Great!
And how I could match prepends, ie, how I could identify AS paths
which has prepends ?
Regards,
./diogo -montagner
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Deepak Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And since you can't have non-numeric AS numbers... you can always use "."
>
> like ^.+$
>
> DJ
>
Thanks everyone.
james
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Peder @ NetworkOblivion wrote:
Is anybody using one or more PA-MC-T3 cards with a 7200vxr with NPE300?
In the past.
If so, what kind of performance are you seeing with basic config
(mlppp enabled, but not nat, fw or bgp)?
It seemed happy. I used CEF per-packet rather than MLPPP. I know peop
Eric Kagan wrote:
It
also eliminates the need to get the NON-VXR's out (which you will probably
end up doing sooner than later and quickly regret the NON-VXR move). We did
the same thing about 4 years ago and I swore at myself as I swapped out each
one with a VXR over the past 2 years..
W
Nevermind. "." would match spaces as well. Should have read better.
Deepak Jain wrote:
And since you can't have non-numeric AS numbers... you can always use "."
like ^.+$
DJ
Daniel Faubel wrote:
I like to use this:
^[0-9]+$
^[0-9]+_[0-9]+$
^[0-9]+_[0-9]+_[0-9]+$
-Daniel
-Original Mes
And since you can't have non-numeric AS numbers... you can always use "."
like ^.+$
DJ
Daniel Faubel wrote:
I like to use this:
^[0-9]+$
^[0-9]+_[0-9]+$
^[0-9]+_[0-9]+_[0-9]+$
-Daniel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of james edwards
Se
Is anybody using one or more PA-MC-T3 cards with a 7200vxr with NPE300?
If so, what kind of performance are you seeing with basic config
(mlppp enabled, but not nat, fw or bgp)?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether
I like to use this:
^[0-9]+$
^[0-9]+_[0-9]+$
^[0-9]+_[0-9]+_[0-9]+$
-Daniel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of james edwards
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 1:41 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Expression to match 1, 2, or 3 AS
The data sheet for the 7201 doesn't list support for the single-strand
SMF SFPs. It only lists support for the DOM-enabled SFPs
(SFP-GE-S/L/T/ZX) and not the older SFPs (GLC-T/SX/LH/SX/BX). Is it
safe to assume that the GLC-BX SFPs would work in the 7201?
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/coll
What have i done wrong here, I used to use this to match 1,2 and 3 AS path,
for filtering down a full table:
^[0-9]*$
^[0-9]*_[0-9]*$
^[0-9]*_[0-9]*_[0-9]*$
--
James H. Edwards
Senior Network Systems Administrator
Judicial Information Division
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Matthew Crocker wrote:
Take a look at some DS-1 bridge gear
- Turin Traverse PacketEdge 1200 12 cDS-3s into vlans on a GigE (HDLC,
PPP, FR-DLCI)
- Zhone IPD12000E, 12 slot chassis with 24 port EFM DS-1 cards
- Zhone MALC723, 20 slot chassis with 24 port EFM DS-1 cards
I use the Zhone
Thanks for the replies. This was exactly what I was looking for. I'm
familiar with the newer VXRs. We have 2 7206VXRs w/ G1 which work
great. These older 7200 would be for a new venture that we're getting
into. The cost of placing cheap, lower-end 7200s at remote COs to
terminate fewer cust
Hi folks...
Sorry for the long message but wanted to share what was causing this
problem...
We have two T1's - each connected to a separate 8 port T1 card on the 6500.
We were trying to do multilink across the two cards and it obviously doesn't
work (or at least with our config). Moved both T1's
> I've been googling and searching on the cisco site but many
> of the documents
> point to broken links. I'm looking for pointers for configuring (if
> possible) multilink frame relay on a 2600 series. We want to
> terminate 2
> Frame Relay T1's on a single 2600 series if possible.
>
> Any
also i want to draw attention that when establishing eBGP over loopback it
will need ebgp multihop to be configured as well because the default TTL
over directly connected interfaces is 1 and in case of loopback it is
reachable over just single hop
some IOS version defaults multihop to 255 so the
I see... didn't notice that before. If I assign an address to a subinterface of
f0/0 on the local side and point the remote side of the tunnel to that, what
address should I use? Something from the vlan in question?
And while I'm at it, I'll try and move the f0/0 on the remote side to a new
sub
Although it may work with an interface address, you are really supposed
to create a loopback interface for the L2TPv3 tunnels, and point to the
other side loopback address in your xconnect statements. You would also
obviously need a route to the other end loopback addresses, either using
a dynamic
Scott, although not specifically for the 2600 series, try the first
link when you search for "site:cisco.com multilink frame relay" on
Google.
According to the Feature Navigator, Frame Relay Multilink is supported
on the 2600s in the 12.2T which is the release the document at the
first li
I've been googling and searching on the cisco site but many of the documents
point to broken links. I'm looking for pointers for configuring (if
possible) multilink frame relay on a 2600 series. We want to terminate 2
Frame Relay T1's on a single 2600 series if possible.
Any pointers would b
Greetings,
The network I'm working on looks like this:
Customer:
192.168.101.0/24 ethernet 192.168.11.0/24
2600 ---1721
| |
| data
> Thanks for the replies. This was exactly what I was looking for. I'm
> familiar with the newer VXRs. We have 2 7206VXRs w/ G1 which work
> great. These older 7200 would be for a new venture that we're getting
> into. The cost of placing cheap, lower-end 7200s at remote COs to
> terminate few
Aaron wrote:
Did you setup ebgp multihop since you are doing peering to the loopbacks?
Yes.
Curious on why you would want to use the loopback instead of the
interface for ebgp. Definitely not the recommended way unless you are
trying to load balance on multiple links.
Here is my (slightly
Thanks for the replies. This was exactly what I was looking for. I'm
familiar with the newer VXRs. We have 2 7206VXRs w/ G1 which work
great. These older 7200 would be for a new venture that we're getting
into. The cost of placing cheap, lower-end 7200s at remote COs to
terminate fewer custom
Did you setup ebgp multihop since you are doing peering to the loopbacks?
Curious on why you would want to use the loopback instead of the interface
for ebgp. Definitely not the recommended way unless you are trying to load
balance on multiple links.
Not 100% clear, but do you a static route on eac
It looks like you have the incorrect ip address on the remote site or the
tunnel xconnect pointing to the wrong interface on the local side (FE2/0
instead of FE0/0)
Aaron
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Steven Pfister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I've got a project I'm trying to use an l2tpv3 t
I've got a project I'm trying to use an l2tpv3 tunnel for. The tunnel seems to
establish just fine, but it doesn't seem to do quite what I expected it to do.
I'm trying to access vlans on a remote site that's connected via ATM. The
remote side is connected by a 3640 router, plus a 8510 switch. O
No. RPR+ from what I recall and not even that w/ MPLS.
Your best HA is in 12.0(32)S for that platform. It doesn't
have NSF for MPLS though but it does have it for IP from what
I recall.
Rodney
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 08:00:05AM -0400, David Coulson wrote:
>
>
> Rodney Dunn wrote:
> >12.0(32)S
Gary Roberton wrote:
Anyone know the IOS image required (e.g. Enterprise Base) for Multi-VRF
(VRF-Lite) on a 2811 router.
Almost all L3 images will do VRF lite. But non-static routing between
them, or especially providing an MPLS or tunnelled endpoint pipe between
CEs/PEs is gonna cost you :-
Rodney Dunn wrote:
12.0(32)S latest or 12.4(19a) are good places forthe 75xx.
Does 12.4 on the 75xx support SSO/NSF?
David
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puc
'sh redund history' might give a clue why it's never coming up
and staying there.
memory mismatch
image mismatch
HA configuration issue
are the 3 most common I've seen.
But fyi, you really need to get off that 12.2S code.
Long story...
12.0(32)S latest or 12.4(19a) are good places forthe 75x
Hi All,
I'm having a bit of a hard time getting the QOS result I want on a 1800
router. I'm running VoIP trunks between digital PBX systems, but can't get
the priority treatment that I want.
The setup involves a 1801 router at one end on a ADSL connection, and a 2821
router at the other on a SDSL
Gary Roberton wrote:
Anyone know the IOS image required (e.g. Enterprise Base) for Multi-VRF
(VRF-Lite) on a 2811 router.
Feature Navigator is your friend. According to that, it's in IP Base for
12.4(19).
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck
Anyone know the IOS image required (e.g. Enterprise Base) for Multi-VRF
(VRF-Lite) on a 2811 router.
Thanks.
Gary
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net
36 matches
Mail list logo
