Re: [c-nsp] BGP Hold Time Expired, but why?

sorry forgot to specify the bgp session from aR1 to bR2 is the session in question ck On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:21 AM, Christian Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello - > > I have the following topology in lab, testing different failure scenarios. > When i disconnect the link between aR1 and

[c-nsp] BGP Hold Time Expired, but why?

Hello - I have the following topology in lab, testing different failure scenarios. When i disconnect the link between aR1 and bR1, what would appear to be normal happens - ospf and ldp neighbor go down. When i re-connect the link between aR1 and bR1, the interface comes back up, osfp/ldp neighbor

Re: [c-nsp] QoS VLAN trunk Port

Hi Guys, > In general, you enable "mls qos vlan-based" on the trunk, and apply the > qos policy on the SVI (interface vlan) - even without any L3 config on > the SVI. > For Qos this works very well. I have an aditionall requirement. Now I have to change the Cos values on the trunk Port. So t

[c-nsp] Help with multilink ppp, routing not working correctly..

I can't believe this one isn't working, I am sure I am looking over something stupid. I needed to mux up 3x T1's between a location. Information is as follows: (relevant bits) Location-A: Cisco 1720 ! interface Serial0 description To Location-B ip address 38.103.8.238 255.255.255

Re: [c-nsp] 6500 rfc 2674 support?

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 03:42:01PM -0400, Jeff Fitzwater wrote: Does anybody know if there is some knob to turn to get the FDB using MIB2 (RFC 2674) qBridgeMIB instead of using the dot1 mib with "indexing" on the bridge table? When I go after the qBridgeMIB on a 6500 running 12.2(33)SXH or o

Re: [c-nsp] IPSec VPN client to router, then router to router

Yep, it's definitely possible. Just figured out what it was. My bogon filter on router B was sending all 172.16/12 stuff to null0, and that was my local pool on router A. Doh!!! Vijay, no need to lab it, working fine now. Thanks, Chuck -Original Message- From: Luan M Nguyen [mailto

[c-nsp] 6500 rfc 2674 support?

Does anybody know if there is some knob to turn to get the FDB using MIB2 (RFC 2674) qBridgeMIB instead of using the dot1 mib with "indexing" on the bridge table? When I go after the qBridgeMIB on a 6500 running 12.2(33)SXH or on a 3750 running 12.2(44) they return nothing. Is there ano

Re: [c-nsp] IPSec VPN client to router, then router to router

I am thinking it's possible. Your client dials in, get IP from a pool on A, looks at the routing table see the resource through GRE/IPSEC tunnel between A-B, goes there, then if A advertises the pool network to B, you are set for the return traffic. crypto map just have 2 instances... crypto map C

Re: [c-nsp] Aw-too respone: OT: Possible List Troll/Spammer..

On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 11:08 -0400, Richey wrote: > 4. Do you think it is important that all mailing list members should > be informed of your absence via an auto responder when you take a day > off? I'm out of office this millennium. Please contact my boss at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or send me an auto-

[c-nsp] 7600, SRB3, high CPU on "BGP Event"

Hi all, After upgrading a SUP720-3BXL to SRB3, CPU utilization has gone up quite a bit. The CLI is extremely slow and the input lag is awful. The process eating up most of the CPU is the "BGP Event" which seems to run quite often and every time it does, I get the following messages from 'debug ip

Re: [c-nsp] mGRE support for IPv6?

You are asking at the right time :) as 12.4.20T just got released and it has support for IPv6 with DMVPN. I haven't got a chance to play with it yet, but you could check it out for yourself. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps8802/ps6968/ps6441/pro duct_bulletin_c25-409474.html#w

Re: [c-nsp] OT: Possible List Troll/Spammer..

Benny Amorsen wrote: "Marko Milivojevic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: In our defense (yes, I'm one of those people), some of us may not have a choice. When we leave for vacation, we must configure auto responder, if we are using work e-mail for mailing list subscriptions... If a mail program s

Re: [c-nsp] OT: Possible List Troll/Spammer..

"Marko Milivojevic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In our defense (yes, I'm one of those people), some of us may not have > a choice. When we leave for vacation, we must configure auto > responder, if we are using work e-mail for mailing list > subscriptions... If a mail program sends an autorespo

Re: [c-nsp] OT: Possible List Troll/Spammer..

> Couldn't resist. > > 4. Do you think it is important that all mailing list members should be > informed of your absence via an auto responder when you take a day off? In our defense (yes, I'm one of those people), some of us may not have a choice. When we leave for vacation, we must configure a

[c-nsp] mGRE support for IPv6?

Greetings, Has anybody heard of upcoming (or current, that I totally missed) support for mGRE with IPv6 (mGRE over native IPv6 core)? Thanks, Aaron ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisc

[c-nsp] IPSec VPN client to router, then router to router

Anyone, I'm having trouble getting the following config to work. I'm not sure if this is possible. I've got 2 878 routers attached to internet. Router A supports remote clients. Router A has a LAN to LAN IPSec connection to Router B. B does not support clients. Is it possible for the

Re: [c-nsp] NAT and hairpin's

So what happened to the CPU of the ASA when the PC and server started sending 100Mbt of data to each other? Or was one of them running 10BaseT, half-duplex? Ted > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Fawcett Simon > Sent: Thursday, July 17,

Re: [c-nsp] OT: Possible List Troll/Spammer..

Couldn't resist. 4. Do you think it is important that all mailing list members should be informed of your absence via an auto responder when you take a day off? Richey -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Van Tol Sent: Friday, July 18,

Re: [c-nsp] OT: Possible List Troll/Spammer..

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cisco-nsp- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Leadmon > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 4:12 PM > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [c-nsp] OT: Possible List Troll/Spammer.. > > > Not sure if others are getting this, but I kn

[c-nsp] WS-X4548-GB-RJ45V spec

Hello list, Does anyone know the specs for the WS-X4548-GB-RJ45V module? Is the 1 Gbps per port-group (8-to-1 oversubscription) full-duplex? What is the maximum pps processing? I am facing 'Rx No Packet Buffer' on two ports of the same port-group and I think I'm hitting those limitations.

Re: [c-nsp] tx-ring-limit on ISR ATM-AIM module...

I just found this: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk39/tk824/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094b48.shtml It looks like it the BD part stands for "buffer description" so its a data structure describing a packet in the queue? Tyson Scott wrote: State-Based Decoder This is my guess based

Re: [c-nsp] Can an AS5350 route ISDN calls to ISDN?

Andreas Sikkema wrote: Cool! So I just match the incoming calls from a specific ISDN interface and send them out through another. Are there any caveats I should know? I can't match specific dialled or dialling numbers, currently there's over 2000 DID's in use on these lines. No other caveats

[c-nsp] tx-ring-limit on ISR ATM-AIM module...

All: I believe I may need to tune down the tx-ring on a 3845 with ATM-AIM module. I'm looking at this, and it doesn't look like it uses the same system that the 7200 uses (i.e., with particles/576 bytes per particle calculation). from "show controller atm0/ima0" I see the following: #

Re: [c-nsp] Can an AS5350 route ISDN calls to ISDN?

Alex Balashov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 16-07-2008 18:21:50: > Andreas Sikkema wrote: > > > We're using a Cisco AS5350 as a SIP <-> ISDN PRI gateway. Normally we > > route calls from the incoming ISDN line to a SIP server (and vice versa). > > Currently we're wondering if we can route calls

Re: [c-nsp] GigE Max Speed

Thanks for all the replies on list and off list We're going to sit tight until early next week when the new x-connect will be installed thankfully...;) Take care, Paul -Original Message- From: Lincoln Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 10:13 PM To: Paul

Re: [c-nsp] multilink ds3's

According to my brand new knowledge of Bandwidth Points concept for 7200 in case of absence of other PAs in both chassis ur PA-2T3+ will consume 180 bp of 600 bp of selected bus at each router :O) Except jokes, as soon as ur configuration is supported I don't see any reason to make U unhappy wit