Re: [c-nsp] Learning a Multicast Ethernet for Unicast IP via ARP

2008-10-18 Thread Peter Rathlev
On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 15:49 -0700, David Sinn wrote: On Oct 17, 2008, at 3:00 PM, Crist Clark wrote: Is there a way to tell the router to accept the ARP responses or is the static entry the best option? Ignoring ARP responses that return multicast (or broadcast) MAC addresses is required

Re: [c-nsp] Converting OSPF backbone to iBGP

2008-10-18 Thread Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
Nathan wrote on Thursday, October 16, 2008 4:23 PM: On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Phil Mayers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can import from OSPF to BGP, but it has some risks and complexities that are best avoided if at all possible. Much worse is distributing BGP into OSPF - don't do

[c-nsp] OSPF over PPPoATM

2008-10-18 Thread Daniele Orlandi
Hello, Someone please help me spotting out what so weird is happening :) I have a 2800 with an ADSL WIC connected to a 7200 with a STM-1 ATM. The 2800 is sending hellos on its virtual access interface, the 7200 is receiving those hellos and sending his, but the 2800 isn't receiving the

Re: [c-nsp] RSP720-10G

2008-10-18 Thread Saku Ytti
On (2008-10-17 09:50 -0400), Mike Johnson wrote: Does anyone know the details of the problems they are having with the RSP720-10G? Specifically, RPR+ and IPSEC? I hope a new software release will fix the problems. Any details or experiences would be greatly appreciated. IIRC it's limited

Re: [c-nsp] 6500 and MPLS

2008-10-18 Thread Peter Rathlev
On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 11:29 -0500, Justin Shore wrote: Peter Rathlev wrote: This is VLAN mode EoMPLS. The PFC3 supports this and (physical) port mode. I still haven't been able to get this to work. I tried this between 2 7600s running SRB1 and between the same 7600s to 2 6524s, one

Re: [c-nsp] Conditional BGP

2008-10-18 Thread Masood Ahmad Shah
A nice book on BGP Practical BGP By Russ White Regards, Masood BLOG: http://www.weblogs.com.pk/jahil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Boolootian Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 6:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc:

[c-nsp] EIGRP routing failure

2008-10-18 Thread Mohammed Dado
Dears, We're configuring EIGRP on both sides, customer and ISP. The customer router are dumping the following logs. Here's an example of some logs .. 128326: Oct 6 02:48:05.387 CDT: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(1) 100: Neighbor 10.253.225.38 (GigabitEthernet1/31.101) is up: new adjacency

[c-nsp] [Fwd: Re: MPLS and IPSEC co-working (reviving an old thread)]

2008-10-18 Thread Christopher Hunt
Luan, To recap: applying an IPSEC crypto-map to the WAN physical interface works, but applying IPSEC to Tunnel Protection breaks end-to-end vrf connections. I have a feeling it is a combination of these two statements from Cisco: from

Re: [c-nsp] EIGRP routing failure

2008-10-18 Thread Greg Wendel
If you are running older IOS code the K value mismatch could be the router misinterpreting the goodbye message sent by EIGRP. Hope this helps. On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Mohammed Dado [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dears, We're configuring EIGRP on both sides, customer and ISP. The customer

Re: [c-nsp] EIGRP routing failure

2008-10-18 Thread Mark Mckillop (mmckillo)
I'd begin with checking the K-Values match on both sides... Router#show ip protocols Routing Protocol is eigrp 100 100 Outgoing update filter list for all interfaces is not set Incoming update filter list for all interfaces is not set Default networks flagged in outgoing updates Default

[c-nsp] DSCP QoS, etc

2008-10-18 Thread Keith Stewart
Where can I find more information regarding DSCP, manual assignments, and their default assignments? The typical cisco pages leave me wanting more specific information. Perhaps my search terms are failing. Any help/direction would be appreciated. ___