Nathan <> wrote on Thursday, October 16, 2008 4:23 PM:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Phil Mayers
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You can import from OSPF to BGP, but it has some risks and
>> complexities that are best avoided if at all possible. Much worse is
>> distributing BGP into OSPF -
Hello,
Someone please help me spotting out what so weird is happening :)
I have a 2800 with an ADSL WIC connected to a 7200 with a STM-1 ATM.
The 2800 is sending hellos on its virtual access interface, the 7200 is
receiving those hellos and sending his, but the 2800 isn't receiving the
hellos
On (2008-10-17 09:50 -0400), Mike Johnson wrote:
> Does anyone know the details of the problems they are having with the
> RSP720-10G?
>
> Specifically, RPR+ and IPSEC? I hope a new software release will fix the
> problems. Any details
> or experiences would be greatly appreciated.
IIRC it's limi
On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 11:29 -0500, Justin Shore wrote:
> Peter Rathlev wrote:
> > This is VLAN mode EoMPLS. The PFC3 supports this and (physical) port
> > mode.
>
> I still haven't been able to get this to work. I tried this between 2
> 7600s running SRB1 and between the same 7600s to 2 6524s, o
A nice book on BGP
Practical BGP
By Russ White
Regards,
Masood
BLOG: http://www.weblogs.com.pk/jahil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Boolootian
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 6:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.ne
Dears,
We're configuring EIGRP on both sides, customer and ISP. The customer router
are dumping the following logs. Here's an example of some logs ..
128326: Oct 6 02:48:05.387 CDT: %DUAL-5-NBRCHANGE: IP-EIGRP(1) 100: Neighbor
10.253.225.38 (GigabitEthernet1/31.101) is up: new adjacency
128327
Luan,
To recap: applying an IPSEC crypto-map to the WAN physical interface
works, but applying IPSEC to Tunnel Protection breaks end-to-end vrf
connections. I have a feeling it is a combination of these two
statements from Cisco:
from
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk827/tk369/technologie
If you are running older IOS code the K value mismatch could be the router
misinterpreting the goodbye message sent by EIGRP.
Hope this helps.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Mohammed Dado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dears,
>
> We're configuring EIGRP on both sides, customer and ISP. The custom
I'd begin with checking the K-Values match on both sides...
Router#show ip protocols
Routing Protocol is "eigrp 100 100"
Outgoing update filter list for all interfaces is not set
Incoming update filter list for all interfaces is not set
Default networks flagged in outgoing updates
Default
Where can I find more information regarding DSCP, manual assignments, and
their default assignments?
The typical cisco pages leave me wanting more specific information. Perhaps
my search terms are failing.
Any help/direction would be appreciated.
___
ci
10 matches
Mail list logo