Re: [c-nsp] Cat6500 sup2 boot from PCMCIA

Had the same issue here with a couple 6500/SUP2's, and the Flash Card's were working, but after a format got flakey. The only real end solution we found that worked was to take and replace them with a different flash card, till we got one it was happy with. Actually went though a couple cards,

Re: [c-nsp] IOS for 7204VXR-G1 + MPF

>Vague recollection is that the general consensus is >MPF is a feature best avoided. There will be little >future support. Cisco has EOL'd MPF Hello, MPF is out. Noted. What is the best-practice IOS for use in a PPPoE over L2TP environment? Thanks again, C. Flav Sent from my BlackBerry

Re: [c-nsp] Question about class-map, policy-map and TOS field?

Andy Saykao wrote: > What I don't get is - how do we set an ip tos value of 15 using > policy-map when that option doesn't exist (see below). > > Router(config)#policy-map TOS-TAG-IX-POLICY > Router(config-pmap)#class TOS-TAG-IX-CLASS > Router(config-pmap-c)#set ip ? > dscpSet IP DSCP (

[c-nsp] Question about class-map, policy-map and TOS field?

Hi All, We're trying to reduce the CPU on one of our core routers (7606) by using class-map and applying the policy-map to the interface rather then the old PBR way of "ip policy route-map". Here's our current config using the PBR way of doing things: interface GigabitEthernet4/1/1 bandwidt

Re: [c-nsp] Combining multiple vlans into a single vlan.

The ME3750's support 1:1 vlan mappings...you can also do 1:1 vlan mappings over EoMPLS. The ideal solution to this would be VPLS. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net on behalf of Mario Spinthiras Sent: Mon 12/15/2008 8:08 PM To: Peter Rathlev Cc: Teller, Robert; c

Re: [c-nsp] Combining multiple vlans into a single vlan.

I know on the Allied Telesis boxes you can do VLAN translations from one vlan to another. Is there no way of doing multiple translations on a Cisco? Havent really had the need to do something like this before however I guess bridge groups could be useful. How would you overcome the STP problems tha

Re: [c-nsp] OPSF over a Lan-to-Lan VPN tunnel

use a gre tunnel. i have a tutorial here on it. http://www.spinthiras.net/2007/11/24/vpn-via-tunnel-interfaces/ do that n run ospf on top. remember that tunnel ifaces are to be treated like normal ifaces, regards, mario ___ cisco-nsp mailing list ci

Re: [c-nsp] OPSF over a Lan-to-Lan VPN tunnel

On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 16:41 -0800, Per A wrote: > Is there any way to make this kind of environment work, or possibly an > alternative solution where the Outer/VPN devices do not participate in > the Routing Protocol but the Inner Routers do? Why not use a GRE tunnel between the two inner routers

Re: [c-nsp] OPSF over a Lan-to-Lan VPN tunnel

You are going to have to use a combination of GRE and ISAKMP to get this to work. Routing updates are not passed through vpns natively. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Per A Sent: Monday, December 15, 200

[c-nsp] OPSF over a Lan-to-Lan VPN tunnel

This is an exersize in learning, and I'm getting stuck on the OSPF/Routing piece.   What I am wanting to do is build a Lan-to-Lan VPN network between a 2811 and a 3005.  Once that is done, inner routers at each site will run OSPF/Routing Protocol and should populate routes between the sites.   I

Re: [c-nsp] Combining multiple vlans into a single vlan.

On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 09:52 -0800, Teller, Robert wrote: > Could you also use private vlans? I cannot see how it could work, though private VLAN technology isn't my strongest side, to put it mildly. The thing I can't see how to achieve would be receiving two different VLANs on the same physical p

Re: [c-nsp] IOS for 7204VXR-G1 + MPF

Rado Vasilev wrote: Hi Rodney, I was wondering the last few days what would be the ideal Cisco platform for higher performance VPDN? Currently I'm using 7301/7200-NPE-G2 routers and don't like the idea of splitting the load to more and more LNS/LAC devices. Would the future proof platform with

Re: [c-nsp] IOS for 7204VXR-G1 + MPF

Hi Rodney, I was wondering the last few days what would be the ideal Cisco platform for higher performance VPDN? Currently I'm using 7301/7200-NPE-G2 routers and don't like the idea of splitting the load to more and more LNS/LAC devices. Would the future proof platform with HW capabilities be

Re: [c-nsp] IOS for 7204VXR-G1 + MPF

IIRC you had to buy a license to run it and I think we stopped selling them and taking a faster CPU path route along with hardware forwarding (ASR1000 for example). Generally, I don't think it's recommended because so many features were not supported with it. Rodney On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:0

[c-nsp] Aluisio da Silva/CTBC Telecom/BR está au sente do escritório.

Estarei ausente do escritório a partir de Qui, 04/12/2008 e não retornarei antes de Seg, 05/01/2009. Responderei à Sua Mensagem Quando Retornar. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp ar

[c-nsp] IOS for 7204VXR-G1 + MPF

Hi all, we currently utilize Cisco 7204VXR routers for PPPoE aggregation and are interested in testing the MPF feature. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/ios/12_3/12_3y/12_3ya8/MPF123YM.html A little while ago we tested c7200-i12s-mz.123-14.YM12.bin and had to do an emergency rollback s

Re: [c-nsp] Combining multiple vlans into a single vlan.

Could you also use private vlans? -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Peter Rathlev Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 12:33 PM To: Jeff Cartier Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Combining multiple

[c-nsp] Trace Logs on ASR1000

Has anyone found a "scalable"* way to disable trace logging to hard disk on ASR1000? Our RANCID is not very happy with constant changes on the hard disk... * Scalable = one that doesn't require at least 20 commands that may or may not survive reload, as they are exec-level statements. -- Marko CC

[c-nsp] Priority-queue & srr-queue question

I have a switch configured for deployment and I've used the same base configuration on all of the ports. The switch is due to support Voice traffic, but not on every switchport. srr-queue bandwidth share 1 70 25 5 srr-queue bandwidth shape 3 0 0 0 priority-queue out My question i

Re: [c-nsp] IPSec between Cisco and D-Link

there are 2 peers (217.x.x.x and 85.x.x.x) and 2 matching acls (111 - 192.168.0.0/24 and 112-192.168.96.0/21) why do u say "Obviously 82.x and 217.x aren't the same as 192.168.200.0/24 and 192.168.0.0/24 " can u explain? 2008/12/12 Tony Varriale > The transforms are fine and the debug says

Re: [c-nsp] 7600 Sup720 IOS Image

Paul Stewart wrote: Hi there.. We have a 7606 that's been running for 30 weeks now with no problems. Starting a few days ago, we'd had two incidents where a supervisor card has reloaded. With SSO redundancy mode in place, the impact hasn't been too major but definitely enough to get our att

Re: [c-nsp] 12.2(33)SRC2 running 7600

Hello! On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:42:03PM +0200, Saku Ytti wrote: > > does someone have any notes of open bugs on 7600 RSP720-3CXL-GE runs > > 12.2(33)SRC2 , > > I suspect BGP ghosting issue in SRC2. I'm fairly certain at least that in > VPNv4 RR functionality there is such. (RR thinks it has s

[c-nsp] 7600 Sup720 IOS Image

Hi there.. We have a 7606 that's been running for 30 weeks now with no problems. Starting a few days ago, we'd had two incidents where a supervisor card has reloaded. With SSO redundancy mode in place, the impact hasn't been too major but definitely enough to get our attention ;( The chassis

[c-nsp] IP SLA logging....

Hi, Does anyone know how I can generate as syslog message (either locally or sent to a syslog server) as opposed to a trap? I have the following configuration, running 124-16a Enterprise Base on 3725 router. ! ! logging buffered 16384 debugging ! ip sla monitor logging traps ip sla monitor 2 ty