>I've only been recently tasked with looking into possible (re)uses for
this
>box so I'm not sure how it managed to handle 2 sets of full routes
either.
256M RAM will barely handle one BGP feed filtered to /23 (140k routes)
>The first thing that came to mind when tasked with this was actually
>Qu
Hi friends,
is it ok to have HSRP NAT configuration like this?
ip nat Stateful id 1
redundancy dmz
mapping-id 1
interface Vlan2
protocol udp
ip nat pool outside-dynamic a.a.a.a a.a.a.a netmask 255.255.255.248
ip nat inside source route-map nat-fast00 pool outside-d
Just FYI , recently our 7206VXR (w NPE225) 256MB could not handle 2
BGP full routes (total around 40k routes) from provider. The router
generated not enough memories and disabled its CEF.
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Ang Kah Yik wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Would an RSP4 (256MB RAM) from a 7505 be a
Hi,
I've only been recently tasked with looking into possible (re)uses for this
box so I'm not sure how it managed to handle 2 sets of full routes either.
The first thing that came to mind when tasked with this was actually
Quagga/OpenBGPD. There appears to be a discussion on Linux Gigabit router
I'm surprised it worked mid 2007 - I've certainly had no success loading
full tables into 256Mb in the last two years without aggressive filtering.
So, my answer would be 'no'. I'd be tempted to use a Linux or BSD box if
you just want a basic route server.
Ang Kah Yik wrote:
Hi all,
Would a
Hi all,
Would an RSP4 (256MB RAM) from a 7505 be any good as a pure route server (no
forwarding) for 2 or more full IPv4 BGP tables?
Prior to decommissioning in mid '07, it acted as a border router handling 2
upstreams but I would like to know if it can cope with routing table growth
for at least
