Hi
I configure router's ethernet1 to support 4 vlans and each vlans will have
/28
I have 48 ports switch. I will configure a truck port in port2 and also
configure
eg:
port 3 - port 16 vlan2
port 17 - port 33 vlan3
port 34 - port 48 vlan4
Now I have question:
1/ how is the last vlan
When you RMA a part back to Cisco refurb, they send you another refurbished
part back. I am myself a provider of secondary market hardware and have gone
through Cisco refurb a few times for my clients. My opinion on it would be
that Cisco does not put a whole lot of emphasis on this program
Probably just a fluke, it happened to be that one of the 9 or so fans
wasn't spinning at the proper RPM's.
---Chris
On Feb 20, 2009, at 6:03 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
OHi,
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 04:54:09PM -0500, Chris Wallace wrote:
We purchased a Cisco 6509 through this program a
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:09:26AM -0500, Chris Wallace wrote:
Probably just a fluke, it happened to be that one of the 9 or so fans
wasn't spinning at the proper RPM's.
Which is exactly my point - the fans are monitored very well by the onboard
diagnostics, and I find it surprising that
This question was posted earlier, before I opened ticket with CISCO.
Router is 6500 with 720-CXL running SXI code.
1. I have router A which is used to connect to our three ISPs ( two
I1s and one I2 connection with full BGP), and also receives all our
internal campus traffic via RIP
Jeff Fitzwater wrote:
This question was posted earlier, before I opened ticket with CISCO.
Router is 6500 with 720-CXL running SXI code.
1. I have router A which is used to connect to our three ISPs ( two
I1s and one I2 connection with full BGP), and also receives all our
internal campus
Hypothetically, if there is no L2 or L3 security in place, would it
be as simple as creating a sw acc vlan 230, and allowing 230 on the
trunk port on my switch to start scoping about at the other end?
Well, the L2 security in question is that on the other end of the
trunk, it *should* be
Hi all
I would like to know what is best way to setup ip in swtich
If the switch ip is not in operation network eg: private ip, I can't see any
operation ip in the port of the switch by sh arp. it is only showing all arp in
management network
If I use this ip as same as
Geoffrey Pendery wrote:
Hypothetically, if there is no L2 or L3 security in place, would it
be as simple as creating a sw acc vlan 230, and allowing 230 on the
trunk port on my switch to start scoping about at the other end?
Well, the L2 security in question is that on the other end of the
chloe K wrote:
Hi all
I would like to know what is best way to setup ip in swtich
If the switch ip is not in operation network eg: private ip, I can't see any operation ip in the port of the switch by sh arp. it is only showing all arp in management network
If I use this ip as
I am not clear about your route-map match subs, set vrf. If your two
specific subnets are in one campus core, you need to put them in to VRF
ESNET by ip forwarding vrf ESNET. If these two specific subnets are
distributed in your campus core, you need to use end-to-end vrf-lite or
MPLS, and put
Instead of an external link with 2 physical ports, you could try to create a
GRE tunnel with 2 loopback interfaces.
interface Loopback0
ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Loopback10
ip address 10.10.100.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface Tunnel1
ip vrf forwarding NSP
ip address
On Feb 23, 2009, at 1:59 PM, schilling wrote:
I am not clear about your route-map match subs, set vrf. If your
two specific subnets are in one campus core, you need to put them in
to VRF ESNET by ip forwarding vrf ESNET. If these two specific
subnets are distributed in your campus core,
Hi,
--On Dienstag, November 06, 2007 11:33:20 -0600 Justin Shore
jus...@justinshore.com wrote:
The book discusses how to harden HSRP, VLANs, VTP and trunk ports and
how to prevent ARP attacks, STP attacks, etc. It has a good 802.1x
section as well. It's got a good amount of useful info.
I
I'm working on a small issue that I just can't track down. The
connection is 2 T1's bonded in a multilink interface. Connection within
the core network is fine from the remote end, but the traffic will not
make it to the default route on the core 7513.
Hundreds of other connections are setup
Hi,
I work in an ISP environment and in it I found developed MPLS delivering ip
vpns.
There is one client with 5 branches.
All work fine except for 1.
This is the scenario.
The default route is derived from the corporate office (HQ). Its network
range is 172.16.0.0/16
Say branch with problem
#core B
ip vrf ESNET
.
.
int vlan100
desc no1 prefix for ESNET
ip address 192.168.100.1 255.255.255.0
ip forwarding vrf ESNET
int vlan101
desc no2 prefix for ESNET
ip address 192.168.101.1 255.255.255.0
ip forwarding vrf ESNET
int vlan200
desc VRF ESNET to edge A global
ip address
check no ip unreachable on the PE interface? I got bite once.
verify the LSP?
Ivan's blog for rescue :-)
http://wiki.nil.com/PE-to-PE_troubleshooting_in_MPLS_VPN_networks
Schilling
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Rocker Feller
rocker.rockerfel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I work in an ISP
I changed the ip as a test. There is a route for .224.117/30. I pasted
the route for the old ip. My mistake.
On Feb 23, 2009, at 6:02 PM, Matlock, Kenneth L
matlo...@exempla.org wrote:
The F0/0 interface on the 2651 is configured for 198.70.224.117/30,
yet
you're routing
Christian Meutes wrote:
Hi,
--On Dienstag, November 06, 2007 11:33:20 -0600 Justin Shore
jus...@justinshore.com wrote:
the original problem was as far as I remember access switches with
disabled
or not working spanning-tree created l2-loop and flooded PE edge port.
Replying to a question
Hi,
Christian Meutes wrote:
Hi,
--On Dienstag, November 06, 2007 11:33:20 -0600 Justin Shore
jus...@justinshore.com wrote:
the original problem was as far as I remember access switches with
disabled
or not working spanning-tree created l2-loop and flooded PE edge port.
Replying to a
The F0/0 interface on the 2651 is configured for 198.70.224.117/30, yet
you're routing 198.70.33.176/29 to them. Is there NAT'ing going on, or
did I miss something?
Ken Matlock
Network Analyst
Exempla Healthcare
(303) 467-4671
matlo...@exempla.org
-Original Message-
From:
Hi,
My full scenario
CE1 --- PE1 --- PE2 - CEZ
On the PE1 interface I have a tunnel to CEZ .
nb: PE2 is not mpls enabled.
CEZ has a ptp link to PE2
LSP - tunnel is up from PE1--- CEZ and I can reach the CEZ router via the
tunnel ptp.
- from the CEZ lan CE1
When I was working on an application to post xml code to my ace modules
I found the xml info on the ace module, have you tried enabling
http/https and browsing to the device?
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
Hi,
--On Montag, Februar 23, 2009 23:25:36 + a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
Replying to a question from 2 years ago? I wish I had some of your free
time in my pocket! :-)
surely so busy that its taken 2 years to reply? ;-)
(thats the sort of 'free time' I wouldnt be after! ;-) )
I
Hi Rocker
that doesn't seem to me as MPLS VPN topology as both PE1 interfaces to CE1
and CEZ are non-MPLS interfaces , it is much like
local-switching scenario
try using CONNECT command
best regards
--Ibrahim
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Rocker Feller
rocker.rockerfel...@gmail.com
26 matches
Mail list logo
