[c-nsp] Right IOS for 7600

Hi All Asking you real IOS gurus out there for the production options on IOS upgrades. Where running 7600 Sup720PFC3BLX OSPF BGP and wish too add microFlow policing Netflow Currently on 12.2(18)SXF7 I understand that are several trains too choose from. Best Regards Mattias Gyllenvarg Omnitron

[c-nsp] Router failure - config lost?

Hi * I've got something of a question that's not necessarily a clear technical problem or config problem ... rather just scoping as to whether other people have come across this, too ... We have a customer who has some 400+ locations. All of these are connected to the central office via an

Re: [c-nsp] Right IOS for 7600

On Mar 16, 2009, at 6:34 AM, Wyatt Mattias Gyllenvarg wrote: Hi All Asking you real IOS gurus out there for the production options on IOS upgrades. Where running 7600 Sup720PFC3BLX OSPF BGP and wish too add microFlow policing Netflow Currently on 12.2(18)SXF7 I understand that are

[c-nsp] BGP - peer down w/MD5 - suppress logging

Is there any way without messing with the level of logging we have turned on today to suppress these messages in particular: Mar 16 09:43:24: %TCP-6-BADAUTH: No MD5 digest from 206.223.143.84(179) to 206.223.143.81(13412) (RST) tableid - 0 Mar 16 09:43:32: %TCP-6-BADAUTH: No MD5 digest from

Re: [c-nsp] Right IOS for 7600

Hi, On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:34:44AM +0100, Wyatt Mattias Gyllenvarg wrote: Asking you real IOS gurus out there for the production options on IOS upgrades. [..] I understand that are several trains too choose from. About all options seem to have been discussed in great detail on this list.

Re: [c-nsp] Sup720-3BXL Stable IOS

Hi Paul, in case you don't need any fancy 7600 only or SR only features or hardware support you might want to go back to 12.2(18)SXF. We're running SXF10 quite some time now including new 7600 with BGP and IS-IS for v4 and v6 multi-topology w/o the slightest problems up to now. But sooner or

[c-nsp] SXI leaks (was: Netflow on SUP720-3BXL)

(SXI has slow memory leaks in BGP, at least for us. Cisco case has been opened, but hasn't proceeded anywhere yet). Interesting. Do you have any details you can share? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

[c-nsp] DLSW on Catalyst 4506-E is it possible???

Hi Guys, DLSW is supported in Catalyst 4500 platform I'm searching in Cisco Doc but it seems that DLSW doesn't run over Cat4500. Are there some way to run DLSW over CAT4500? (in 6500 a MSFC card will solve the problem). Here my sh version 4500# sh version Cisco IOS Software, Catalyst 4500

Re: [c-nsp] SXI leaks (was: Netflow on SUP720-3BXL)

Hi, On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 03:15:01PM +, Phil Mayers wrote: (SXI has slow memory leaks in BGP, at least for us. Cisco case has been opened, but hasn't proceeded anywhere yet). Interesting. Do you have any details you can share? This is on a peering point + upstream provider router,

Re: [c-nsp] Right IOS for 7600

Hi, On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 08:18:42AM -0700, Derick Winkworth wrote: IOS changes. The list archives are not relevant. In that case, the answer is contact your Cisco account representative. All knowledge available on this list is experience from the past - and especially for the 6500/7600,

Re: [c-nsp] Sup720-3BXL Stable IOS

On Monday 16 March 2009 04:42:00 pm Marcus.Gerdon wrote: But sooner or later we'll be hit by the AS32-capable update... we'll see if SXJ will run on 7600, else it will be (forced into SRE). I posit quite a number of upgrades at the (peering) edge come end of this year, along with ensuing

Re: [c-nsp] SXI leaks (was: Netflow on SUP720-3BXL)

Hi, On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:09:48AM -0500, Murphy, William wrote: Thanks for the heads up... Are any of the maintenance releases of SXH also affected by this memory leak? We've not seen this in SXH3a (and you don't want to use SXH3 due to BGP ghost bugs). I have not tested SXH4. gert --

[c-nsp] Fast IGP on 6500 gigE

All, Given a mix of 6748-SFP, 6704 and 6716 linecards, with SXI software, and OSPF over SVIs, what are people successfully using to speed up link loss and subsequent IGP convergence? Our config broadly looks like: int Vlan38xx description p2p to another router ip address 192.168.0.2

Re: [c-nsp] Fast IGP on 6500 gigE

Hi, you've written most routers are dual-attached, so the concern mostly is failure detection and not re-establishment of a neighbor I think. If you go into debounce or carrier-delay you'll raise the convergence time as a link failure will be ignored for a short time before processes are

Re: [c-nsp] Fast IGP on 6500 gigE

Marcus.Gerdon wrote: Hi, you've written most routers are dual-attached, so the concern mostly is failure detection and not re-establishment of a neighbor I think. Correct If you go into debounce or carrier-delay you'll raise the convergence time as a link failure will be ignored for a short

[c-nsp] Sup720-3BXL and diag issues

I have a 6500 with a sup720-3BXL. Every time I put a WS-X6408A-GBIC card in the chassis, diag fails the card. I haven't rebooted the box yet, as this carrys a significant amount of traffic, has anyone else seen this type of problem. Diag on the most recent card shows: 7) TestUnusedPortLoopback:

[c-nsp] SXI high cpu usage and rp inband SPAN feature not available

We installed SXI Advanced Enterprise in one of our catalyst 6500 with sup720-3BXL, and the box is having persistent high CPU over 90%/80% where we have normal cpu utilization around 30%.   I played with RP SPAN on our SXF11 before, it's good to see what is punted to CPU according to the following

Re: [c-nsp] SXI high cpu usage and rp inband SPAN feature not available

On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 04:42:38PM -0400, schilling wrote: We installed SXI Advanced Enterprise in one of our catalyst 6500 with sup720-3BXL, and the box is having persistent high CPU over 90%/80% where we have normal cpu utilization around 30%.?? I played with RP sh proc cpu sort 5s Start by

Re: [c-nsp] Sup720-3BXL and diag issues

Hi, I have a 6500 with a sup720-3BXL. Every time I put a WS-X6408A-GBIC card in the chassis, diag fails the card. The cards work in other chassis. same slot, or different slot? alan ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] SXI high cpu usage and rp inband SPAN feature not available

On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 08:42:38PM +, schilling wrote: We installed SXI Advanced Enterprise in one of our catalyst 6500 with sup720-3BXL, and the box is having persistent high CPU over 90%/80% where we have normal cpu utilization around 30%.   I played with RP SPAN on our SXF11 before, it's

Re: [c-nsp] Sup720-3BXL and diag issues

On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 07:40:30PM +, Jimmy Changa wrote: I have a 6500 with a sup720-3BXL. Every time I put a WS-X6408A-GBIC card in the chassis, diag fails the card. I haven't rebooted the box yet, as this carrys a significant amount of traffic, has anyone else seen this type of problem.

[c-nsp] Sub-int based EoMPLS on a 6700 series LC in a 7600

I have a TAC case open right now regarding a new EoMPLS VC I'm trying to turn up. This is the first I tried to terminate in a sub-int on one of my 7600s. The LC is a 6748 w/ DFC. The sup is a 720-3BXL running SRB1. The other end is a ME3750 running 12.2(50)SE. The ME's end is a 1Q trunk