[c-nsp] C7600 power allocation

2009-03-30 Thread Dmitry Kiselev
Hello! Could anybody explain me how exactly IOS choise which module to disable if system run in combined power mode and one of power inputs failed? http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/7600/ios/12.2SR/configuration/guide/pwr_envr.html#wp1020384 However, if one power supply fails and there

[c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

2009-03-30 Thread Mark Tech
Hi I have a prospect for a 10G upstream customer and Upstream ISP connections. I would need to connect these into our 7609s running RSP 720-3CXL's, at the moment I have found that the WS-X6704-10GE card may be suitable. My technical requirements are: 10Gbps line rate IPv4 Able to handle full

[c-nsp] VPN Concentrator returns error when saving config

2009-03-30 Thread Kevin Edmunds
Hi List, I have a VPN 3020 concentrator running version 4.7.2, lately its started to give the following error when we save the config via the web GUI: Syslog: SEV=3 CONFIG/25 RPT=8 GET post-validation Bad Value Error on alIpLocDefRtPref.0. SEV=4 CONFIG/17 RPT=15 Done writing configuration

Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

2009-03-30 Thread Mark Tech
Hi thanks fot that. I was looking at the ES card until the licence pricing was introduced. Then it suddenly went away very quicky!! Cheers Mark - Original Message From: Mark Tinka mti...@globaltransit.net To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Cc: Mark Tech techcon...@yahoo.com Sent:

[c-nsp] Cisco PIX Boot Error

2009-03-30 Thread Ibrahim Alsharif
Hello Dears, I'm facing a problem with Cisco PIX 515E, when I do reload on it it goes to the Monitor Mode although there is an image file in the flash memory. and the Boot Variable pointing to it. also when I do upload new Image by TFTP it's working but when I reload it, same Issue (Monitor

Re: [c-nsp] 12.4(24)T Bug ?

2009-03-30 Thread Antonio Soares
I found in the meanwhile that IPv6 traffic is completely broken between CE and PE: CE1#ping 2001:10::2 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 2001:10::2, timeout is 2 seconds: U Success rate is 0 percent (0/5) CE1# PE1#sh runn int f0/0 Building configuration...

Re: [c-nsp] C7600 power allocation

2009-03-30 Thread Alexandre Snarskii
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:51:43AM +0300, Dmitry Kiselev wrote: Hello! Could anybody explain me how exactly IOS choise which module to disable if system run in combined power mode and one of power inputs failed?

Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

2009-03-30 Thread Mark Tinka
On Monday 30 March 2009 05:41:12 pm Mark Tech wrote: I have a prospect for a 10G upstream customer and Upstream ISP connections. I would need to connect these into our 7609s running RSP 720-3CXL's, at the moment I have found that the WS-X6704-10GE card may be suitable. We typically order our

[c-nsp] MTU settings on GSR linecard 3GE-GBIC-SC

2009-03-30 Thread Jan Sandmaier
Hi, does anybody know the reason why I can configure a 9180 byte MTU on port 0 and 1 on a GSR 3-port Gigabit Ethernet port (3GE-GBIC-SC) but only 4470 byte on the third port. I use IOS 12.0(32)S12 and 12.0(31)S6. 12012-lab(config-if)#exit 12012-lab(config)#int Gig 2/0

Re: [c-nsp] C7600 power allocation

2009-03-30 Thread Harald Firing Karlsen
Alexandre Snarskii wrote: On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:51:43AM +0300, Dmitry Kiselev wrote: Hello! Could anybody explain me how exactly IOS choise which module to disable if system run in combined power mode and one of power inputs failed?

Re: [c-nsp] 10GE card for 7609

2009-03-30 Thread Eric Gauthier
Mark, I'm not sure if you have other 10g links, but keep in mind that Cisco has (at least) two 10g optics - Xenpak and X2 - that are not intercompatible. I believe that the 6704-10ge uses Xenpak and the 6708-10gE, which is the same card but with 8 ports, uses X2. If everything else you do is

Re: [c-nsp] No GRP images for GSR's?

2009-03-30 Thread Rob Shakir
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 05:21:40PM +0100, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Brandon Ewing wrote: Note that 12.0(32)S12 contains the 4-byte ASN problems discussed here and on NANOG, so 12.0(32)S11 is your best bet. As far as I have heard, most people are at 12.0(32)SY, which is

Re: [c-nsp] Opinions of DDoS appliances, other techniques, most notably Cisco Guard

2009-03-30 Thread Rob Shakir
Hi, We have a deployed Riverhead/Cisco Guard + Detector platform, that I've been working reasonably closely with over the last 6-9 months. We run the appliances, rather than the 6500/7600 modules, and are pretty happy with how they function. I think that the major issue with this platform right

[c-nsp] Network Survey Document?

2009-03-30 Thread Bill Buhlman
Does anyone have a document they follow when doing a network survey? I'd rather not create one from scratch. Please send replies to billbuhl...@yahoo.com   Thanks, Bill ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] How not to redistribute statics into VRFs/BGP

2009-03-30 Thread ChrisSerafin
ChrisSerafin wrote: That does sound correct, I will schedule some testing time, thanks for your input! David Freedman wrote: Chris, the key thing here are the vrf address-families address-family ipv4 vrf -Voice e.g Imagine these like the equivalent of the normal ipv4 address-family, but

Re: [c-nsp] How not to redistribute statics into VRFs/BGP

2009-03-30 Thread David Freedman
ip route vrf Chmbr-General 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.120.24.2 ! This is an ASA on the 'LAN' for this site ip route vrf Chmbr-General 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Serial0/1/0.310 Right, got you so far So I remove the static route pointing to 10.120.24.2 and point it to the remote MPLS spoke, 10.120.24.2. You

Re: [c-nsp] How not to redistribute statics into VRFs/BGP

2009-03-30 Thread ChrisSerafin
David Freedman wrote: ip route vrf Chmbr-General 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.120.24.2 ! This is an ASA on the 'LAN' for this site ip route vrf Chmbr-General 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Serial0/1/0.310 Right, got you so far So I remove the static route pointing to 10.120.24.2 and point it to the remote MPLS

[c-nsp] Multilink PPPoA

2009-03-30 Thread Steven Saner
I am trying to configure multilink PPPoA of two ADSL circuits. At the head end I have a 7206 and at the client end a 1721. I do have PPPoA working on a single circuit, but it isn't quite clear to me if I can bind two circuits using MPP and how to do it. There are quite a few working PPPoA

[c-nsp] Subnet Traffic

2009-03-30 Thread Mohammad Khalil
Hey all , we have multiple international links , and we have multiple customers with their own subnets in addition to our subnets is there a way to know how much each subnet consumes traffic ? is there any way to draw this traffic /per subnet ? thanks in advance Best Regards, Mohammad Khalil

Re: [c-nsp] Subnet Traffic

2009-03-30 Thread Lars Lystrup Christensen
Hi Mohammad Netflow is probably the best solution for you. Take some time to explore it on CCO. __ Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards Lars Lystrup Christensen Director of Engineering, CCIE(tm) #20292 Danske Telecom A/S Sundkrogsgade 13, 4 2100 København Ø

Re: [c-nsp] Subnet Traffic

2009-03-30 Thread Mohammad Khalil
The subnets are mostly advertised via BGP To: eng_m...@hotmail.com; cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Subnet Traffic From: char...@thewybles.com Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:15:23 + Put each subnet in its own vlan and use netflow?

Re: [c-nsp] Subnet Traffic

2009-03-30 Thread Ivan Pepelnjak
If you put each subnet in a VLAN, you could use interface counters. Unfortunately, life is rarely so simple. -Original Message- From: char...@thewybles.com [mailto:char...@thewybles.com] Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 10:15 PM To: Mohammad Khalil; cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net;

Re: [c-nsp] Subnet Traffic

2009-03-30 Thread Lars Lystrup Christensen
In that case, it's quite easy... Just do aggregation based on source AS and use next-hop-as to determine the usage of traffic from each customer on you uplink peers. __ Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards Lars Lystrup Christensen Director of Engineering,

Re: [c-nsp] 3750/3750E stack upgrade downtime?

2009-03-30 Thread Peter Rathlev
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 16:20 -0400, Jeff Kell wrote: Is there any way to roll an upgrade out to a 3750 stack without abruptly rebooting the entire stack? I would very much like to know if there is. AFAIK you can't complete the upgrade without downtime. Two switches with even just rebuild

Re: [c-nsp] 3750/3750E stack upgrade downtime?

2009-03-30 Thread Ryan Hughes
This was discussed a few months back on list. ISSU isn't supported on the 3750's and to be honest, quite a few people have issues with stacks as is. Cisco is driving ISSU with the modular switching platforms (4500/6500/Nexus). What Peter describes with using the 10G links on the -E series is

Re: [c-nsp] 3750/3750E stack upgrade downtime?

2009-03-30 Thread luismi
Hi Peter, I agree with you but in that case you loose the option to use cross-etherchannel against the stack :-/ El lun, 30-03-2009 a las 22:45 +0200, Peter Rathlev escribió: On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 16:20 -0400, Jeff Kell wrote: Is there any way to roll an upgrade out to a 3750 stack without

Re: [c-nsp] Y.1731 frame loss measurement on Cisco

2009-03-30 Thread Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
Marlon, Current Y.1731 implementation supports mainly fault management (i.e. ETH-AIS, ETH-RDI). For performance management we use IP SLA for CFM (ping/jitter), which works fine in our case: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2sr/12_2srb/feature/guide/sr_meth.html#wp1056192 -- Tassos

Re: [c-nsp] Multilink PPPoA

2009-03-30 Thread Jason Lixfeld
I actually just set this up on the weekend. You can use virtual- template 1 ip unnumbered with an ip pool on the headend and dialer0 ip address negotiated on the client too if you don't want statically routed clients. Headend: ! username * password * ! vpdn enable ! vpdn-group 1

Re: [c-nsp] Freeware management software

2009-03-30 Thread Walter Keen
Try nagios or opennms, each are a little different. Nagios is a bit more customizable in service checks, but perhaps that has changed in the last few releases Walter Keen NETWORK TECHNICIAN RAINIER CONNECT -Original Message- From: Arne Larsen / Region Nordjylland a...@rn.dk Sent:

[c-nsp] ATM on 7206 - PVC 255 BICI ?

2009-03-30 Thread Jay Hennigan
We have a DSL aggregation circuit terminating on a PA-A3-OC3SMI in a 7206VXR. Our provider is delivering PVCs with a VP of 450. As far as I can tell IOS won't support VPs over 255. The provider referring to a BICI interface connection type. Is there support for this on the 7206 platform