Your original concern was redundancy, so I'd personally go with two L3
interfaces per ASR over a static GEC. You may end up with more traffic over the
VSL (as I don't believe there's a ECMP enhancement to prefer same-chassis ports
as there is for MEC), but you'll avoid having to depend on UDLD,
Michael Robson wrote:
> The circuit supplier quoted dB values for the links on handover which
> should have meant that most of the links would have been within
> acceptable values: perhaps the 6500-quoted values aren't very accurate?
If you haven't done so, meticulously clean the optics, cables,
Alasdair McWilliam wrote on 02/05/2009 10:01:
Even if ASR only supports GEC, surely my apparent 'one way' traffic
symptoms aren't right? I only have one Gigabit Ethernet link in the
Port-Channel, between the ASR and the active chassis within the VSS.
When the channel-group command is removed
Hi,
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 11:12:35PM -0400, Ryan Werber wrote:
> Allstream at 151 front street in Toronto does this. They run a single
> strand SMF and they terminate it into a form of a media converter, which
> passes off 2x BNC as expected for a DS3. They do this for both clear
> channel and
Hi,
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 02:10:30PM -0700, Marlon Duksa wrote:
> Hi - 1) does anyone know if Cisco (IOS) is using IPv6CP for neighbor
> discovery on a PPP link or they run neighbor discovery on top of PPP link?
> 2) same question for HDLC over PPP -> how do they do neighbor discovery
> there -
Even if ASR only supports GEC, surely my apparent 'one way' traffic
symptoms aren't right? I only have one Gigabit Ethernet link in the
Port-Channel, between the ASR and the active chassis within the VSS.
When the channel-group command is removed from the ASR's GE interface,
and the config
