Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ASA and Update Cisco VPN Client

Hi Thanks for this information. Anyone have more detail ? anyone have use this function ? Thanks Stephane 2010/1/13 Marcelo Zilio > I just see in my ASA 8.2 under Configuration > Remote Access VPN > Network > (Client) Access > IPsec Connection Profiles (Advancede > IPSec) an option > Client

Re: [c-nsp] RIB failure : Higher admin distance

..sorry for the top posting.. Hi Andy, You wouldn't happen to have an interface on router A on with an addr. in that range would you? *connected* eq ad of 0. A longer prefix match will not work in this case when it comes to installing routes in the bgp routing table. Regards ./Randy --- On Thu,

[c-nsp] OSPF Campus Design : Excessive SPF Runs

Hello, We currently have Layer 3 Routed Access configured at all of our Metro Campus locations. There are a few obvious deviations from the best practice design guides. The current setup is: Core -->Datacenter Distribution --> | (fiber connect) | --> Building Distribution -->

[c-nsp] RIB failure : Higher admin distance

Hi all, We have two routers at site A and one at site B, both routers at site A have an uplink each to a transit provider. There are two Layer 3 core switches below the two routers. The router at site B has an uplink to another transit provider and there is also a private link between the rout

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF on ASA with large routing tables

We run a 5540 with about 8500 routes with no real problems. I do plan on doing some filtering just to minimize the size of its table for efficiency. FYI - ASA in multicontext doesn't support dynamic routing protocols. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:c

[c-nsp] OSPF on ASA with large routing tables

We're considering running OSPF on handful of core ASA 5580 but our routing table is somewhat large (roughly 10,000 routes). Does anyone have any experience running OSPF on an ASA platform with a large number of routes on a production network. Did you run into any limitations or issues. We don't

Re: [c-nsp] cisco frame-relay termination without a frame switch -update

Just putting this out there in case it helps someone. This example shows a 7200 with two connected routers. I also got fram-relay termination working with a 6500 but that platform does not seems to support the command needed to create frame-relay PVC's the frame-relay route command. Another

Re: [c-nsp] DS3 over STM1

Hi, On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 09:16:06AM -0800, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote: > I'm not sure what platform you have, but there are channelized STM-1 > cards for the 7200, 7500 and the 1000 series routers. You should be > able to peel off a single DS-3 on the STM-1 and get the right framing > and

[c-nsp] Cisco UCS

Our local sales team has really been bombarding us with material on Cisco's UCS (Unified Compute System) as of late, and I was wondering who on this list has begun deployment of UCS. If you have decided to deploy, how has your experience been? Also, I'd like to hear how you were able to convince

Re: [c-nsp] DS3 over STM1

Hello Ian: > -Original Message- > From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp- > boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering > Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 1:19 AM > To: Ian Henderson > Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] DS3 over STM1 > > Hi, >

Re: [c-nsp] BGP to OSPF redistribution

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 04:25:04PM -0500, null zeroroute wrote: > Very good suggestion, however the provider is not sending the internet > routing table, only our own internal network's routes. Or are you > suggesting some providers make mistakes and send full internet tables to a > private VRF cu

Re: [c-nsp] PVLAN and trunks (for redundancy and more bandwidth), any idea?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Pavel, Pavel Skovajsa schrieb: > by suboptimal I meant the fact it is possible (simply by sending to > ..) to flood the traffic from one isolated access switch > port through distribution layer, into the rest of the switching fabric > i

Re: [c-nsp] PVLAN and trunks (for redundancy and more bandwidth), any idea?

Hi, Glad it helped. by suboptimal I meant the fact it is possible (simply by sending to ..) to flood the traffic from one isolated access switch port through distribution layer, into the rest of the switching fabric infra simply due to the fact that all uplink/downlink ports are "swit

[c-nsp] Experiences with STM-16 to GE multiplexers/converters?

Hi all, Does somebody has experiences with STM-16 to GE multiplexers/converters? We have several links from a fiber distributor which expects STM-16 framing (there are some active WDMs etc.). At the moment we have an SDH overlay and SDH components at each POP. They divide the STM-16 to at least

Re: [c-nsp] IOS, IOS-XR and RANCID

Hi. > We have a network composed by Cisco equipment running IOS and IOS-XR. > We run RANCID to manage/backup our configurations. > > Is anybody has experience on this software with both versions (IOS and > IOS-XR)? We have difficulties to integrate both versions simultaneously in > the same RANCID

Re: [c-nsp] IOS, IOS-XR and RANCID

:-> "Simon" == Simon Muyal writes: > Hello all, > We have a network composed by Cisco equipment running IOS and IOS-XR. > We run RANCID to manage/backup our configurations. > Is anybody has experience on this software with both versions (IOS and > IOS-XR)? We have difficultie