[c-nsp] Input queue flushes and drops

2010-02-25 Thread Javi in AUS
Gents, We have a WAN facing Cisco 3845 which is showing the numbers below on it's Gi0/1 interface: Input queue: 0/75/9/71805 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 714432 Of course, these counters are increasing and we have a bunch of users at the other side of the link complaining abou

Re: [c-nsp] Netflow - GSR engine 5

2010-02-25 Thread Adam Powers
Also keep in mind that the packet did actually ingress on some interface on the router somewhere prior to it being dropped by the ACL. The NetFlow record must be sent to the collector in order for the ingress interface traffic to be reported correctly in the collector. In other words, if the route

Re: [c-nsp] Netflow - GSR engine 5

2010-02-25 Thread Dobbins, Roland
On Feb 26, 2010, at 12:43 AM, Drew Weaver wrote: > but why is it showing up in the netflow exports? Because that's how NetFlow is supposed to work on a real router, vs. the broken implementation on 6500/7600 with current hardware. ;> It's of great operational significance to know that even t

Re: [c-nsp] PIX/ASA "show counters" command

2010-02-25 Thread Antonio Soares
Thanks Andrew, i will investigate the options you mentioned. Regards, Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (R&S/SP) amsoa...@netcabo.pt -Original Message- From: Andrew Yourtchenko [mailto:ayour...@cisco.com] Sent: quinta-feira, 25 de Fevereiro de 2010 21:41 To: Antonio Soares Cc: dwhit...@cis

Re: [c-nsp] IP Base vs IP Services with 3750Es

2010-02-25 Thread Alan Buxey
Hi, > IPv6 exists in IP Services now and the advanced IP services train has been > EoL'd. You have to change your SDM profile to get IPv6, so it will initially > seem to be absent (it even rejects config commands until you change the > profile). ah! that might explain a few things when will

Re: [c-nsp] IP Base vs IP Services with 3750Es

2010-02-25 Thread Murphy, Jay, DOH
It the feature sets that are deemed "advanced". You can leverage these if necessary, however, per the previous thread, it's what you do, that enables the changes. ~Jay Murphy IP Network Specialist NM State Government IT Services Division PSB – IP Network Management Center Santa Fé, New México

Re: [c-nsp] IP Base vs IP Services with 3750Es

2010-02-25 Thread Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:40:42 +, you wrote: > IPv6 only exists in the IP advanced services right now it seems No, actually IPv6 was moved to IP Base and IP Services (same as IPv4) with 12.2(50)SE. -A ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nethe

Re: [c-nsp] IP Base vs IP Services with 3750Es

2010-02-25 Thread Saxon Jones
IPv6 exists in IP Services now and the advanced IP services train has been EoL'd. You have to change your SDM profile to get IPv6, so it will initially seem to be absent (it even rejects config commands until you change the profile). -saxon On 25 February 2010 14:40, Alan Buxey wrote: > Hi, > >

Re: [c-nsp] PIX/ASA "show counters" command

2010-02-25 Thread Andrew Yourtchenko
Antonio, On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Antonio Soares wrote: David/Andrew, Thank you very much for clarifying this. Well, the customer was looking for something like this but for TCP sessions traversing the PIX/ASA. For example, how many SYN packets were sent to the systems protected by the unit, how

Re: [c-nsp] IP Base vs IP Services with 3750Es

2010-02-25 Thread Alan Buxey
Hi, > Is there a good breakdown anywhere comparing the functionality of the > Enterprise (IP Services) feature set compared to Standard (IP Base) besides > a big dollar difference? theres document on the cisco site that lets you see. IPv6 only exists in the IP advanced services right now it seem

Re: [c-nsp] Netflow - GSR engine 5

2010-02-25 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:43:37AM -0500, Drew Weaver wrote: > Should ingress packets dropped by ACLs still hit Netflow on the GSR with E5 > linecards? > > Gi2/0/2 10.1.123.32 Null 10.1.123.3 11 A29F 0035 1 I'm not sure whether this is documented anywhere, but this is

Re: [c-nsp] Forwarding traffic to "transparent" device

2010-02-25 Thread Cyrill Malevanov
On Feb 25, 2010, at 12:56 AM, Pavel Dimow wrote: > Hi, > > as I am not native english speaker I don't know how to name my problem > but I will try to give as much details as possible. > Here it is, I have Cisco 7600 wich is core switch, and it have one > uplink to our edge router (it is SVI inte

Re: [c-nsp] PIX/ASA "show counters" command

2010-02-25 Thread Antonio Soares
David/Andrew, Thank you very much for clarifying this. Well, the customer was looking for something like this but for TCP sessions traversing the PIX/ASA. For example, how many SYN packets were sent to the systems protected by the unit, how many SYN/ACK were sent from those systems, how many arr

Re: [c-nsp] IP Base vs IP Services with 3750Es

2010-02-25 Thread Edward Salonia
You can expect the ipservices to give you dynamic routing, among other things. Check out http://cisco.com/go/fn and compare 2 images to see the specific features. - Ed --Original Message-- From: Jeremy Parr Sender: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject:

[c-nsp] IP Base vs IP Services with 3750Es

2010-02-25 Thread Jeremy Parr
Is there a good breakdown anywhere comparing the functionality of the Enterprise (IP Services) feature set compared to Standard (IP Base) besides a big dollar difference? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailma

Re: [c-nsp] Chassis Failure Rate

2010-02-25 Thread Kaegler, Mike
6500: One backplane failure in 120 chassis-years (number of chassis running times the number of years they've been running). 4500: Zero in 20 chassis-years. -porkchop -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of nm...@g

Re: [c-nsp] PIX/ASA "show counters" command

2010-02-25 Thread Andrew Yourtchenko
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Antonio Soares wrote: I have a customer swearing that these counters are related with TCP sessions to/from the PIX/ASA and i found it very strange. Why would we need so many details about that ? These counters make sense for connections traversing the PIX/ASA. By the way

Re: [c-nsp] MPLS and NAT

2010-02-25 Thread Anthony McGarry
I am assuming you need to give a central service (NMS, VOIP) to customer your VRFs. See the following links http://www.ciscosystems.ro/en/US/products/ps6604/products_qanda_item09186a00800b2cd7.shtml http://www.cisco.biz/en/US/docs/ios/12_2t/12_2t13/feature/guide/ftnatvpn.html Anthony Primoz J

[c-nsp] 6500, SUP720, 12.2(33)SXI3, BGP path-mtu flap

2010-02-25 Thread Tim Durack
6500, SUP720, 12.2(33)SXI3. Couple of iBGP neighbors keep flapping on one box. Looks like a path-mtu issue, yet the discovered path looks correct: sh bgp ipv4 unicast summary | i Neighbor|10.116.0.1 NeighborV AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd 10.116.0.1

Re: [c-nsp] PIX/ASA "show counters" command

2010-02-25 Thread David White, Jr. (dwhitejr)
Hi Antonio, Please see inline.. Antonio Soares wrote: > Group, > > I need help with the PIX/ASA "show counters" command: > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/security/asa/asa80/command/reference/s2.html#wp1358086 > > As you can see, the command reference doesn't give too much details about

[c-nsp] PIX/ASA "show counters" command

2010-02-25 Thread Antonio Soares
Group, I need help with the PIX/ASA "show counters" command: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/security/asa/asa80/command/reference/s2.html#wp1358086 As you can see, the command reference doesn't give too much details about the command. The CLI "show counters description" command gives u

[c-nsp] Netflow - GSR engine 5

2010-02-25 Thread Drew Weaver
Howdy, Should ingress packets dropped by ACLs still hit Netflow on the GSR with E5 linecards? Gi2/0/2 10.1.123.32 Null 10.1.123.3 11 A29F 0035 1 Gi2/0/2 is one of our Internet connections 10.1.123.32 (changed to protect, is one of our routed public IPs that isn't routed i

Re: [c-nsp] Forwarding traffic to "transparent" device

2010-02-25 Thread John P. Schneider
I see this as giving the caching device an IP off of the 7600 core switch and using policy based routing (both directions) Let me also recommend ip sla tracking. If the caching device is the one I have experience with you will want to dynamically stop the PBR in the event the caching appliance

Re: [c-nsp] Chassis Failure Rate

2010-02-25 Thread Brian Fitzgerald
Once with a 6500 - we had a chassis that stopped recognizing the left power supply. It still delivered power, but the Sup couldn't tell what model PS it was, so assumed it was a 1300W unit (and shut down half the chassis if the other supply failed). Numerous fan failures with Cat4000s, but no pro

Re: [c-nsp] Comparision between Cisco and Juniper Data Center Switches

2010-02-25 Thread Raymond Macharia
A way to approach it is to list down your requirements. List what you must have and what is nice to have line them up side by side withe equipment and see which delivers what the most of your requirements At the best price if cost is an issue also Raymond On 2/25/10, Muhammad Atif Jauahar wrote:

Re: [c-nsp] Chassis Failure Rate

2010-02-25 Thread Colin Byelong
I think we had one 6509 chassis that had to be swapped we have had around 20 of them for 10 years Thanks Colin Just a quick consensus. Have many people experienced chassis/backplane failure in the 45xx/65xx/76xx lines? I have not yet (knock on wood) and I would just like to know if people

Re: [c-nsp] Chassis Failure Rate

2010-02-25 Thread Daniska, Tomas
The only chassis-related RMA I have experienced were 1) several times the chassis came damaged due to transport 2) a failed env-mon PCB on a 7500 lots of years ago. The folk from TAC has sent me a new chassis only to replace the tiny PCB and send the chassis back :) -- deejay > -Original

Re: [c-nsp] Chassis Failure Rate

2010-02-25 Thread Alan Buxey
Hi, > We swapped everything (sup, linecards, even PSUs) before the chassis > backplane became a suspect. The new chassis solved all problems. we have one 6509 here that appears to be having a backplane issue - we are swapping it out today. first time ever from my own memory - and we have over a

Re: [c-nsp] Getting serial number for 3640s

2010-02-25 Thread Matt Martini
One thing you can do to help with this in the future is to put the S/N into the config. Something like: alias exec SerialNumber SN_ That way it is always available with a show config. True this doesn't help you get the S/N the first time, for that you still have to do a visual inspection.

Re: [c-nsp] Comparision between Cisco and Juniper Data Center Switches

2010-02-25 Thread Jason Gurtz
> 1. [...] few EX4200 Switches (Edge) > 2. [...] 2 Nexus 5000 + Nexus 2000 fabric extender (Edge). > >Which Proposal is best and why? comments needed. One trivially obvious difference: Nexus 5k + 2K is L2 only while EX4200 is L3 capable. ~JasonG ___

Re: [c-nsp] Chassis Failure Rate

2010-02-25 Thread Dirk-Jan van Helmond
Once, a 6500. We had an environment with 8x 6500, this was a new one. When we brought it into service we had very strange behavior. Dropping OSPF sessions, packet-loss, etc. We swapped everything (sup, linecards, even PSUs) before the chassis backplane became a suspect. The new chassis solved a

[c-nsp] Chassis Failure Rate

2010-02-25 Thread NMaio
Just a quick consensus. Have many people experienced chassis/backplane failure in the 45xx/65xx/76xx lines? I have not yet (knock on wood) and I would just like to know if people have experienced this and how often. I have read a few posts where this has happened. Thanks in advance. ___

Re: [c-nsp] Comparision between Cisco and Juniper Data CenterSwitches

2010-02-25 Thread Jason Shearer
Ummm.Ford is in a better cash position that GM. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of sth...@nethelp.no Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 5:05 AM To: atif.jau...@gmail.com Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subjec

Re: [c-nsp] netstatCLOSE_WAIT

2010-02-25 Thread Jason Shearer
Rebooting a windows machine is a dangerous proposition :) I bet if you disable/enabled the adapter it would clear. Jason -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 4:47

Re: [c-nsp] Forwarding traffic to "transparent" device

2010-02-25 Thread Daniska, Tomas
and why there is a problem with simply using VLANs to insert the cache into the path? -- deejay > -Original Message- > From: Daniska, Tomas > Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 1:41 PM > To: 'Pavel Dimow' > Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Forwarding traffic to "transparent" device > > and why ther

[c-nsp] 6500/SXI/CSCtc03951 - MS NLB packet dropping

2010-02-25 Thread Daniska, Tomas
Hello good people... has anyone encountered CSCtc03951 - IP packets with unicast DSTIP and multicast DMAC dropped when incoming and leaving the same distributed etherchannel? I have customer with a large installed base of MS NLB clusters, the setup is based around VSS and multichassis (i.e.,

Re: [c-nsp] Comparision between Cisco and Juniper Data Center Switches

2010-02-25 Thread Konkin, Dana
Please buy both any report your results, I would like to hear the answerl. All the best, Dana ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] MPLS and NAT

2010-02-25 Thread Primoz Jeroncic
Hi I have very specific config of MPLS and to be honest, I have no idea how to configure this. In this rare case CCO doesn't seem to be very helpful... or at least I can't find any samples for this. I have central location, and few subsidaries. MPLS VPN is configured between these, and everythi

Re: [c-nsp] Comparision between Cisco and Juniper Data Center Switches

2010-02-25 Thread sthaug
> > We are going to upgrade our Data Center we need 2 (redundant) core > > switches with top of rack switches (Edge). > > > > We get two Proposals > > > 1. 2 x EX8216 Switches (Core) and few EX4200 Switches (Edge) > 2. 2 x Nexus 7000 (Core), 2 Nexus 5000 (Distribut

Re: [c-nsp] Comparision between Cisco and Juniper Data Center Switches

2010-02-25 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 25/02/2010 10:36, Muhammad Atif Jauahar wrote: >> We are going to upgrade our Data Center we need 2 (redundant) core >> switches with top of rack switches (Edge). >> >> We get two Proposals >> > 1. 2 x EX8216 Switches (Core) and few EX4200 Switches (Edge) > 2. 2

Re: [c-nsp] netstatCLOSE_WAIT

2010-02-25 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 02:49:19PM +0530, vijay gore wrote: > i dont want to reboot my win xp OS Ah, Windows. Rebooting *always* helps with windows problems. (You *did* notice that this is a *cisco* list, not an "I have a windows system and need help!"-list?) gert -- USENET is *not* the

[c-nsp] Comparision between Cisco and Juniper Data Center Switches

2010-02-25 Thread Muhammad Atif Jauahar
Hi, > We are going to upgrade our Data Center we need 2 (redundant) core > switches with top of rack switches (Edge). > > We get two Proposals > 1. 2 x EX8216 Switches (Core) and few EX4200 Switches (Edge) 2. 2 x Nexus 7000 (Core), 2 Nexus 5000 (Distribution

Re: [c-nsp] netstatCLOSE_WAIT

2010-02-25 Thread vijay gore
i dont want to reboot my win xp OS On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 02:04:50PM +0530, vijay gore wrote: > > how to clear CLOSE_WAIT status from netstat > > reboot. > > (With the information you have given us, like "what operating system" > or

Re: [c-nsp] netstatCLOSE_WAIT

2010-02-25 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 02:04:50PM +0530, vijay gore wrote: > how to clear CLOSE_WAIT status from netstat reboot. (With the information you have given us, like "what operating system" or "what is the underlying problem", reboot is the only answer that is guaranteed to help getting rid of CLO

[c-nsp] netstatCLOSE_WAIT

2010-02-25 Thread vijay gore
dear team, how to clear CLOSE_WAIT status from netstat ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/