Hi Eric,
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00807968c8.shtml#problem
Simple nslookup will do the trick. Are you by any chance using the internal DNS
server? ASA needs to inspect the DNS query response message in order to rewrite
the address field
Pshem,
This is supported on 7600 with ES20/ES+/SIP modules (which are required
for VPLS).
Basically you can xconnect a SVI (either to VPLS or a point to point PW)
and then configure different L3 features on it:
IP address and IP VRF
ACLs
PBR
Routing protocols, OSPF, RIP, EIGRP,ISIS, BGP
Netflow
I cannot find protocol pack for 3.6. It is required to upgrade from 3.5.5 as
Iunderstood. Does anyone have the solutiopn for this problem?
2010/4/23 Ruslan Pustovoytov ru...@inbox.ru
Mikhail, I have no 3.5.5 soft.
Our cisco partner give me release notes for 3.6.0 where cisco announce
30gig
Hi,
sounds more like an MTU issue to me.
Best regards,
Jan
On 04/29/2010 11:54 PM, Joel M Snyder wrote:
I have an ADSL customer who uses a Cisco 1841 CPE for Bonded ADSL.
Circuit has worked perfectly for the past one year, but all of a
sudden, out of nowhere, web browsing suddenly stopped
Phsem,
7200 supports only the control plane part of VPLS (for example doing BGP RR for
VPLS auto discovery) but no data plane for VPLS.
Arie
-Original Message-
From: Pshem Kowalczyk [mailto:pshe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 12:34
To: Arie Vayner (avayner)
Cc:
Chris,
To my understanding, this should work...
Are you sure the AP is sending the DHCP request untagged?
BTW, you mentioned the AP is acting as DHCP *server* - is it server or
client?
I would suggest that you just SPAN the port of the AP and put a sniffer
on it so you can see what is going on
Hi,
I would be conducting a 1-day BGP training course for senior technology/IT
personnel of a big telco in my country. My attendees include managers,
senior managers, general manager, and possibly the CIO.
The course should not have anything configuration. The course is expected to
provide them
According to HP, the dhcp request is untagged. I will try running a
sniffer to see what's going on.
The controller is acting as the DHCP server on vlan 3 just for the APs.
I had also tried using the MS DHCP server for the APs, but that had
the same results as well.
On 4/30/2010 6:04 AM,
Just for completeness, here is the link for the feature in the release
notes:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2sr/release/notes/122SRrn.html#wp
3970796
Arie
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Arie
I had Wireshark running on my laptop during testing. It can be
calculated from the number of PC's you're trying to wake up on that
subnet and the number of attempts your management software will do to
wake them up.
-saxon
On 30 April 2010 07:59, Michael Costello coste...@lafayette.edu wrote:
on
on 04/29/2010 06:21 PM Saxon Jones said the following:
I've had no problems enabling this on Catalyst 6500 sup720-10G's
running 12.2(33)SXH5 for the same purpose as you. We also use it on
Catalyst 3750G's running 12.2(52)SE with equally good results. I've
done no load testing of it, though, we
How far apart are these issues geographically?
Honestly it sounds like you are just having stuff break. It happens.
I've had weeks like that were stuff that has ran for years with out
issue starts to fail. None of the problems you are having are never
been seen before. I've had a disk array
- Original Message -
From: Church, Charles charles.chu...@harris.com
To: nsp-cisco cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 12:35 PM
Subject: [c-nsp] Nexus 5xxx VPC peer keepalives
Anyone,
Coming up on a design issue with our upcoming first deployment of Nexus
5010s
Joseph Jackson wrote:
How far apart are these issues geographically?
Honestly it sounds like you are just having stuff break. It happens.
I've had weeks like that were stuff that has ran for years with out
issue starts to fail. None of the problems you are having are never
been seen before.
We can't help unless you post some data or logs.
Richard Golodner
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Mike mike-cisconspl...@tiedyenetworks.com
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 10:02:14
To: Joseph Jacksonrecou...@gmail.com
Cc: Cisco-nspcisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re:
Where is 'here'? Where are these equipment located (geographically)?
You still need to research what changed in the locale, atmosphere,
network, environment etc. prior to these events occuring.
Stay calm, the answer is out there ;-)
eninja
On Apr 30, 2010, at 3:25 AM, Mike mike-
All,
I've recently migrated my Cisco 2821 routers to 15.1T.
It works good except one thing. For some connections I get messages like
this:
Apr 29 13:29:57 10.0.143.254 11979: rtr02.tu: [sys...@9 s_sn=11979
s_id=rtr02.dc3:514 s_tc=3542767 s_dc=0]: 011979: Apr 29
14:29:56.363 MDT:
- Original Message -
From: Eric Magutu emag...@gmail.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; Cisco certification
ci...@groupstudy.com
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 11:45 PM
Subject: [c-nsp] ASA NAT problem
Hi,
Apologies for the cross posting.
I have a problem with a NAT on my network.
FWIW - I ran into something like this on a couple of sites next to a Navy
base many years ago. The issues coincided with tests of the ship-board
long-range radar. The only way we could tell is by being on site and
watching as the dish swept and following it was the path of devastation...
My
Tony,
Read this as well ( it talks about NOT using the mgmt0 for peer keep alives
) - we are trying this too
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus5000/sw/layer2/Cisco_Nexus_5000_Series_NX-OS__chapter8.html
After figure 6, step 3 there is this text ;
Note
VLAN 900 must
Scott,
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 6:36 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] nexus 5xx vpc peer keepalives
Tony,
Read this as well ( it talks about NOT using the mgmt0 for peer keep alives
) - we are trying this too
- Original Message -
From: scott owens scottowen...@gmail.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 5:35 PM
Subject: [c-nsp] nexus 5xx vpc peer keepalives
Tony,
Read this as well ( it talks about NOT using the mgmt0 for peer keep
alives
) - we are trying this
- Original Message -
From: scott owens scottowen...@gmail.com
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 5:35 PM
Subject: [c-nsp] nexus 5xx vpc peer keepalives
Tony,
Read this as well ( it talks about NOT using the mgmt0 for peer keep
alives
) - we are trying this
23 matches
Mail list logo
