Hi,
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 06:12:50PM +0200, Benny Amorsen wrote:
Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de writes:
(Unfortunately, design goals for the 2960S/3750X were different than get
this fixed, so the buffer size is the same)
If you want to stick with Cisco, do they have any similar
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 09:14:58AM +0700, Rudy Setiawan wrote:
I'm hoping to get in touch with the vendor on Monday and try to get a
DFC3BXL sent over.
True, I did not see anything in the log that said about tcam stuff. On our
border1, it did show that since I was using a sup2 engine
I remember having bad times in the far past with intel NIC's on RedHat 7 that
used the e100 driver, back then we've just solved those problems by using only
3com NICs that worked natively fine with linux.
I'd think nowadays those problems were over! I guess not...
Anyway, this is getting too
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 18:12:50 +0200, you wrote:
If you want to stick with Cisco, do they have any similar products with
larger buffers? I.e 24 or 48 1000base-T and some SFP/SFP+ uplink ports?
Look at Catalyst 4948E: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10947/
-A
HI,
Cisco ASR1000 supports OC-12(ATM)/STM-4 (ATM).
ASR1002-F can carry single OC-12 ATM SPA.
ASR1002 can carry up to 3x OC-12 ATM SPAs.
ASR1004 can carry up to 8x OC-12 ATM SPAs
ASR1006 can carry up to 12x OC-12 ATM SPAs.
It's small boxes and reach
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Rich Davies
On 28 Jun 2010, at 03:14, Rudy Setiawan r...@rudal.com wrote:
I'm hoping to get in touch with the vendor on Monday and try to get a
DFC3BXL sent over.
Do you actually need DFCs on this box? A pfc3bxl will happily switch up to 16m
pps before adding a dfc makes a difference. And if your
Gary,
On 28/06/2010, at 1:04 AM, Gary T. Giesen wrote:
NX-OS definitely prevents you from mapping them to *any* instance.
I'll open a TAC case with Cisco tomorrow and see if I get anywhere.
CSCtc54335 covers this.
its due to be sync'd to the next 4.2(x) maintenance release on N5K.
cheers,
Bill,
In addition to Paul's comments: if the main reason for your current
setup is redundancy (and not capacity), you can try using a different
bonding mode on the server. If you use bonding mode 1 (active-backup),
only one of the links is used for traffic.
In bonding mode 1, there are two ways
Hi all,
We are facing here a very strange issue.
We have 4 routers connected to a 3750 stack doing pure L2 stuff.
All 4 routers are talking EIGRP over a VRF-lite environment.
Sometimes, suddenly, without reason -no strange logs, no strange traffic
behaviour as far as we were checking- the
By the way, the first time this happened it wasn't following a
reload or crash of the Cat6k. If I remember correctly, it coincided
with someone connecting a Cisco 3020 blade switch, which we expected
to be the cause. I think that incident led to us blocking
01000c-cd wherever we can.
On 06/28/2010 08:10 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 28 Jun 2010, at 03:14, Rudy Setiawanr...@rudal.com wrote:
I'm hoping to get in touch with the vendor on Monday and try to get
a DFC3BXL sent over.
Do you actually need DFCs on this box? A pfc3bxl will happily switch
up to 16m pps before
On 28/06/2010 10:26, Phil Mayers wrote:
I don't know what the OPs needs are, but for the archives it's worth
emphasising that DFCs do more than just speed the box up. One example: many
LAN cards have very different QoS queueing options with a CFC versus a DFC.
In addition we've hit IOS bugs in
Hi group
I have a problem and need to know is it possible to define multiple
virtual-templates under single bba-group
and if yes , how BRAS selects between them ? based on what conditions ?
thanks for your help
--Ibrahim
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Dear Ibrahim,
I hope that you are doing fine.
I believe only a single cloning source (Virtual-Template) can be specified
under a single bba-group profile, however if you are interested to use
different profiles for a group of PPPoE subscribers you can use the
vlan-range feature and apply
OK I'm jumping in on this thread late as I just got back from some
vacation, don't know if this particluar observation has been discussed,
but ...
We've seen this problem a lot when moving up to new local connection
speeds. The problem for us has been that unless the entire path can
support
Any idea on when that might be? I can't even view the bug report.
Dear valued Cisco Bug Toolkit customer, the bug ID CSCtc54335 you
searched contains proprietary information that cannot be disclosed at
this time; therefore, we are unable to display the bug details. Please
note it is our policy to
Hello folks,
Please forgive the newbie question. I've looked online in various places but
can't just seem to find a simple sample config.
I've never really had to deal with VLANs on the Cisco IOS before. I have a
situation where we need to plug a 2620 in to an Ethernet LAN and tag the
traffic
Nick Voth wrote:
Hello folks,
Please forgive the newbie question. I've looked online in various places but
can't just seem to find a simple sample config.
I've never really had to deal with VLANs on the Cisco IOS before. I have a
situation where we need to plug a 2620 in to an Ethernet
Dear all,
Is it normal that the show processes memory shows so little free memory for
lsmpi_io?
Processor Pool Total: 1821524196 Used: 156947532 Free: 1664576664
lsmpi_io Pool Total:6295088 Used:6294116 Free:972
Regards,
Rens
Thanks Tim. I knew it had to be simple. Yes, we have IP-Plus image or
higher.
Thanks again!
-Nick
From: Tim Jackson jackson@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:10:34 -0500
To: Nick Voth nv...@estreet.com
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Simple VLAN Tag question
This isn't exactly the problem I am seeing.. I actually set up a windows
server and it shows the same result
as the centos server which leads me to believe it's not a driver issue
with centos.
None of our connections are overflowing, the transfer doesn't even start
out fast. It's going through
Paul,
The bursts are sub-second, and you would not see them on the transfer
rate over time or using 30-seconds average counters on the switches (you
would see them with a sniffer...)
I suggest you test this in a structured way, so that we know where the
problem is coming from, and then we know
Hello All,
I have not dealt with this before so any help/comments would be great and much
appreciated...
We have the following IP's that need to be able to ping each other through this
box. I have a server sitting at 10.125.25.5/255.255.0.0 that connects to the
rest of the network via a
On 6/28/10, Joe Loiacono jloia...@csc.com wrote:
OK I'm jumping in on this thread late as I just got back from some
vacation, don't know if this particluar observation has been discussed,
but ...
We've seen this problem a lot when moving up to new local connection
speeds. The problem for us
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Brandon Applegate wrote:
:(
Running 12.2(33) SRE on a 7600 specifically. I have some ipv4 routes nailed
to Null with a track statement at the end. I don't have the option on the
ipv6 static routes.
Is this something that was overlooked in development, or is there
Brandon,
Even though this is not available natively in IOS, it should be possible
to implement using a relatively simple EEM policy.
Would be happy to help if interested.
Tnx
Arie
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On
On 6/23/10 7:41 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 08:31:03 pm Peter Rathlev wrote:
We generally use the highest supported MTU (often 9216
bytes) on all internal links, in an effort to make an
eventual transition easier later.
We initially considered this, but when some
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010, Gert Doering wrote:
Oh, if it's 2960 or 3750 switches, you could run into the these switches
have too tiny buffers to be useful problem.
Is there a disused lavatory with a sign that says beware the leopard where
cisco publishes the port buffer sizes for their small fixed
On 28/06/2010 21:06, Jon Lewis wrote:
I'm still trying to figure out what to look at for IPv6 layer 3 ports to
replace our fleet of 3550-48's. Maybe this won't be an issue because we
really don't likely need gigabit on all ports...the 3560-48 may be good
enough.
there's quite precise
Have you checked to see if selective acks are enabled on both sides of
the connection[s]?
There are many good suggestions about tuning
at http://fasterdata.es.net/ including buffer
tuning, and even a section about e1000 nics
in particular (regarding descriptor settings).
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Richey myli...@battleop.com wrote:
I was hoping to avoid having to go to the colo late at night. We did
finally hear from the customer. A breaker had tripped and they person on
duty had no idea where the breakers were in the building.
T1 duty was long ago
On 6/28/10 4:00 PM, Adam Korab wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Richey myli...@battleop.com wrote:
I was hoping to avoid having to go to the colo late at night. We did
finally hear from the customer. A breaker had tripped and they person on
duty had no idea where the breakers were
On 29/06/2010, at 12:26 AM, Gary T. Giesen wrote:
Any idea on when that might be? I can't even view the bug report.
the next NX-OS 4.2 maintenance release for the N5K is due to be posted on
cisco.com in Q4 CY2010.
Dear valued Cisco Bug Toolkit customer, the bug ID CSCtc54335 you
searched
Fiber fed ones aren't - but usually the copper loop fed ones are.
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Adam Korab
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 7:01 PM
To: Richey
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re:
Hi,
I've been testing 3rd party optics on the various Cisco platforms we use.
Most all platforms tested support 3rd party and can share results later if
people are interested. However, the 3560 and 2960's fail. I have entered
the following commands:
service unsupported-transceiver
no
Will the card respond to loop codes even if the router is in ronmon?
Richey
From: Adam Korab [mailto:adam.ko...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 7:01 PM
To: Richey
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Looping up far end smartjack
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 9:17
I just thought about that for a second.. If the T1 is down then the router
will be down as well. In the event of a power outage I still can't tell if
the power is off or the T1 is down.If I can hit the smart jack and not
the router then I could assume it's a power outage.
Richey
On 6/28/10 7:37 PM, Richey wrote:
Will the card respond to loop codes even if the router is in ronmon?
The NIU will respond to loop codes regardless of the state of the
router. The router doesn't even need to be connected.
CSUs that are integrated into a WIC will probably not respond if the
Yeah I've checked everything possible that i can think of.
No matter how i test locally, it's fast. As long as the latency is less
than 10ms so far it's fast everywhere I've tested.
I wish I could generate 25ms+ latency over a local link somehow and test
that.
Lee wrote:
On 6/28/10, Joe
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Paul wrote:
I wish I could generate 25ms+ latency over a local link somehow and test
that.
FreeBSD dummynet module will do this for you.
40 matches
Mail list logo
