On Sun, 27 Jun 2010, Gert Doering wrote:

Oh, if it's 2960 or 3750 switches, you could run into the "these switches
have too tiny buffers to be useful" problem.

Is there a disused lavatory with a sign that says beware the leopard where cisco publishes the port buffer sizes for their small fixed configuration switches? I just did a number of searches and some poking around in data sheets and couldn't find this info.

I'm still trying to figure out what to look at for IPv6 layer 3 ports to replace our fleet of 3550-48's. Maybe this won't be an issue because we really don't likely need gigabit on all ports...the 3560-48 may be good enough.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jon Lewis                   |  I route
 Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
 Atlantic Net                |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to