Re: [c-nsp] Brief CPU spikes on 6500 Sup 720

2010-07-16 Thread Lincoln Dale
On 17/07/2010, at 9:58 AM, Aaron Riemer wrote: > Enabled SNMP traps and MAC-notifications and this brought another issue to > my attention. There is a huge amount of mac-flapping going on (not for this > host) but our ESX hosts that have vmnics trunking to both our cores. > > The VM guys are sendi

Re: [c-nsp] Brief CPU spikes on 6500 Sup 720

2010-07-16 Thread Aaron Riemer
Hi Lee, Putting a static mac entry in stops the flooding for that particular unicast destination. Therefore the MAC must be disappearing from the switches CAM table. Enabled SNMP traps and MAC-notifications and this brought another issue to my attention. There is a huge amount of mac-flapping goi

Re: [c-nsp] A few very Quick IP SLA questions

2010-07-16 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010, Drew Weaver wrote: 2) If the router has multiple paths to the destination does specifying the source-address mean that 100% of the time it will use the Interface that the indicated source address is assigned to? For IPv4 I've found this to be generally true (using loopbac

Re: [c-nsp] A few very Quick IP SLA questions

2010-07-16 Thread Devon True
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 7/16/2010 11:14 AM, Drew Weaver wrote: > Also the main reason for implementing this is because we had an instance > where a interface didn't go down, but no traffic would pass through it > (routing protocols failed, etc) and we have our default ro

Re: [c-nsp] A few very Quick IP SLA questions

2010-07-16 Thread Drew Weaver
Hi, thanks for your response. >2) If the router has multiple paths to the destination does specifying the source-address mean that 100% of the time it will use the Interface that the indicated source address is assigned to? No .. should be load-balanced. -- If that i

Re: [c-nsp] routing between VRF and global

2010-07-16 Thread Kenny Sallee
I solved this problem (leaking routes from VRF to global route table) by creating a 'VRF' that is the 'global' route table. The cisco solution is like you mentioned (GRE, Cable loopage, or static routes - none that I liked). So it physically looks like this: MPLS WAN Frame DS3 w/ many PVCs (for

Re: [c-nsp] A few very Quick IP SLA questions

2010-07-16 Thread Shimol Shah
Inline On 7/16/10 11:14 AM, Drew Weaver wrote: Hi all, happy Friday. A few questions regarding configuring IP SLA. I've configured two IP SLA probes as such: ip sla 1 icmp-echo x.x.25.97 source-ip x.x.25.98 frequency 10 ip sla schedule 1 life forever start-time now ip sla 2 icmp-echo x

Re: [c-nsp] routing between VRF and global

2010-07-16 Thread Shimol Shah
Maybe something like below document Route Leaking from a Global Routing Table into a VRF and Route Leaking from a VRF into a Global Routing Table = http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk436/tk832/technologies_configuration_example

[c-nsp] A few very Quick IP SLA questions

2010-07-16 Thread Drew Weaver
Hi all, happy Friday. A few questions regarding configuring IP SLA. I've configured two IP SLA probes as such: ip sla 1 icmp-echo x.x.25.97 source-ip x.x.25.98 frequency 10 ip sla schedule 1 life forever start-time now ip sla 2 icmp-echo x.x.25.101 source-ip x.x.25.102 frequency 10 ip sla s

Re: [c-nsp] routing between VRF and global

2010-07-16 Thread Pavel Skovajsa
Hello Jeff, Yes, sound strange, but everybody does this. >From my experience it seems like the only purpose to split the network into VRFs is to subsequently join these VRF due to various business requirements :) I learned most of the stuff from the MPLS Architectures Volume 2 book. Their solution

[c-nsp] routing between VRF and global

2010-07-16 Thread Jeff Bacon
I have a mesh of 6500s connected via various gig fiber links. The 6500s have multiple VRFs defined, but of course most things interesting live in the global zone. I want a host on a VRF on a 6500 to be able to connect to another destination that is reachable through the global zone. Most likely i

Re: [c-nsp] Nagios SNMP ASR1002

2010-07-16 Thread Adam Armstrong
That's because your ASR runs IOS-XE rather than IOS. Try walking .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.91, your sensors will be in there. adam. I can't find my ASR in that list. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lee Riemer Se

Re: [c-nsp] Nagios SNMP ASR1002

2010-07-16 Thread Rens
I can't find my ASR in that list. -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lee Riemer Sent: jeudi 15 juillet 2010 19:18 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Nagios SNMP ASR1002 Enter your image name an

Re: [c-nsp] L2VPN with IP address

2010-07-16 Thread Pshem Kowalczyk
Hi, On 16 July 2010 18:49, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote: {cut} > > You can do that with 'routed pseudowires' on 7600 with ES+ > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2sr/release/notes/122SRrn.html#wp3970796 > Thank you. That's looks like a winner to me :-) kind regards Pshem

Re: [c-nsp] L2VPN with IP address

2010-07-16 Thread Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 12:40:17 +1200, you wrote: > I > could get a xconnect going between one of the bigger boxes and the > small PE, without actually wasting port on the bigger router (by > having some sort of logical interface) then I could run the BGP > session directly. I had a look on Cisco web