Hi guys,
I have a EOSDH as a primary link in which GE is mapped to 4 STM-1
and backup path is another GE Link.
In case 2 STM-1 out of 4 STM-1 in EOSDH fail my routing will not be
aware of that and will not reroute the traffic to backup GE.
This will lead to congestion on Primary link , while bac
Hi,
I am running following configuration on 7206 with IOS - 12.4(15)T10
interface ATM2/0.10856 point-to-point
mtu 1500
no ip redirects
no ip proxy-arp
pvc 1/856
vbr-rt 2048 2048 1
dbs enable
encapsulation aal5snap
max-reserved-bandwidth 100
protocol pppoe group ft-pppoeoa
!
end
b
fwsm - ver 3.2(5) in cat 6509-E(12.2 SXI)
The last-config-change timestamp in the running-copy of the config reflects the
current-time in the following cases:
1) more system:running-config
2) copy running-config to a remote server and open via regular text editor.
A sh run in the module has alw
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Benny Amorsen wrote:
> "Christopher J. Wargaski" writes:
>
>> It just doesn't make sense to run OSPF when all of the links to the
>> remote locations will be running BGP.
>
> Actually it does, in some cases. BGP cannot maintain 2 links to the same
> neighbour, and
"Christopher J. Wargaski" writes:
> It just doesn't make sense to run OSPF when all of the links to the
> remote locations will be running BGP.
Actually it does, in some cases. BGP cannot maintain 2 links to the same
neighbour, and so it does not work if you have redundant links (except
for LACP
Dear Pavel,
I have some strange situation (not that I really understand how it
works), but I want to prevent device connected to a port to become
IGMP querier because
it has a lower ip address. I have also made sure to configure profile
in order to prevent it for receiving (joining) any multicas
I have a couple of Supervisor Engine 2 that I need to upgrade memory in order
to run the latest IOS and to set them up as redundant SUPs on a 6513.
I run in to the following symptoms on both Sups so I figure there must be
something I'm missing.
Both SUP are part number WS-X6K-SUP2-2GE
new S
hey,
> Forgot to say, it's Cisco 3560.
What you are looking for is called "multicast router guard"
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/security/intelligence/multicast_toolkit.html
I've pushed cisco to make it available on platforms smaller than 6500 but no
success so far. Their general reasoning is
Hello group,
We have a customer that is migrating from WIC-1ADSL to HWIC-1ADSL-M and now
the routers are complaining. The bug seems this one:
++
CSCso74996 Bug Details
%SYS-4-CHUNKMALLOCFAIL: Could not allocate chunks for pak subblock c
Symptoms: A "%SYS-4-CHUNKMALLOCFAIL
Hello Dale,
ip pim dr-priority is the "L3 command". Which I dont have turned on,
just plain igmp snooping on
per VLAN basic on the 3560. The problem manifest when some device is
connected to a port in
that VLAN and simply becomes mrouter for that VLAN, which causes that
it can receive all multicas
Just to follow up to this issue, TAC decided this is a bug. I will
post back when I get details on bug ID and any other info.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Jay Nakamura wrote:
> New discovery, no matter what, the router will not let me login to the
> IP on the serial interface if it's on a V
Hi Pavel,
I know that you can force which router will become the DR for the
network with the "ip pim dr-priority" command, otherwise the highest
ip address wins the election. Does that change which router becomes the
querier?
Dale
Thus spake Pavel Dimow (paveldi...@gmail.com) on Mon, Oct 25,
Outer label is for label switching to the destination PE, inner label
can represent a number of this depending on the technology being
deployed (L2/L3/etc).
Robert Crowe
Email: rocr...@cisco.com
-Original Message-
From: Heath Jones [mailto:hj1...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010
If you are doing MPLE TE then you really don't want more than one area as then
you get into inter-area TE tunnels which makes TE optimal path selection
harder(not possible in some cases).
-Ben
On Oct 25, 2010, at 4:50 AM, Rin wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Thank you for your replies.
>
> We use O
Forgot to say, it's Cisco 3560.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Pavel Dimow wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have some strange situation (not that I really understand how it
> works), but I want to prevent device connected to a port to become
> IGMP querier because
> it has a lower ip address. I have also
Hello,
I have some strange situation (not that I really understand how it
works), but I want to prevent device connected to a port to become
IGMP querier because
it has a lower ip address. I have also made sure to configure profile
in order to prevent it for receiving (joining) any multicast group
Dear all,
Thank you for your replies.
We use OSPF basically to advertise each router's loopback so that we can
deploy L2 , L3 VPN between routers. There'll be no other external route
advertised into OSPF. Thus, we will not configure summarization on any ABR
router as well as stubby areas.
I a
Hello,
thanks for your hint concerning the shared interfaces. When I disabled
the interface in other contexts, the neighbour-discovery started working
again. The Problem occured due to a no "mac-address auto" in the config.
When I changed this to "mac-address auto" the neighour discov
--- On Mon, 25/10/10, Vikas Sharma wrote:
> Usually we monitor b/w of the link to decide whether we
> need to
> upgrade the capacity. I want to know if we can monitor the
> class based
> b/w i.e. Premium calss or business-class, when reached to
> threshold, I
> should get an alert. Is that possi
19 matches
Mail list logo
