Re: [c-nsp] IOS - ipv6 uppercase in config - why ?

:- Aaron == Aaron dudep...@gmail.com writes: So, how would you propose that the system know that you are looking for an IPV6 config vs something else like a description or named acl/tunnel/etc? context. e.g. sh run | i nei.*2001:whatever ^ similar things work for

[c-nsp] XR - propagate level 1 into level 2

Hi, I am working on xr 3.6.2, I can see with the command propagate level 1 into level 2 there is only policy option. (config)#propagate level 1 into level 2 ? policy name But when I give following command propagate level 1 into level 2 distribute-list ISIS-1-TO-2, it accepts w/o any issue.

Re: [c-nsp] small (tiny?) route reflector for MPLS L3VPN network

Hi, - Original Message From: Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Mon, January 10, 2011 4:13:07 AM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] small (tiny?) route reflector for MPLS L3VPN network I think a 2900 (or even a 1900) with advanced IP services will more than

[c-nsp] unlabelled OSPF sham links

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Collective, Am hitting a problem whereby I'm trying to form a sham link (and hence OSPF adjacency) between two routers which ultimately exchange packets in an unlabelled fashion. Am trying to replicate, in a lab, an OSPF Super Backbone (as Cisco

Re: [c-nsp] ARP strangeness

Does the ARP cache get populated, or updated, if the traffic comes into an L3 interface, or is it only populated upon a successful ARP response? Frank -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Rodney Dunn Sent:

[c-nsp] Backup edge port

Hi All I have a server connected to 2 switches and need to implement primary/backup scenario on the ports connected to the server from both switches so edge port in switch 1 is primary and edge port in switch 2 is backup and don't forward traffic unless port of switch 1 fails how can be achieved

Re: [c-nsp] Backup edge port

Hi, On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 07:56:51PM +0200, Ibrahim Abo Zaid wrote: I have a server connected to 2 switches and need to implement primary/backup scenario on the ports connected to the server from both switches so edge port in switch 1 is primary and edge port in switch 2 is backup and

[c-nsp] stm-1/stm-4 mux

List Members: Can anyone make a recommendation on a self-contained STM-4/STM-1 mux: STM-4 is used for back haul, and STM-1s are split out for local use. It appears as though a 7206VXR G2 won't accept STM-4 natively, so I need something to split a few of the STM-1's out. Ray. -- This

Re: [c-nsp] ARP strangeness

It only gets updated on getting and ARP packet from the host. It is not updated based on L3 data level traffic flowing to/from the host. Rodney On 1/10/11 11:43 AM, Frank Bulk wrote: Does the ARP cache get populated, or updated, if the traffic comes into an L3 interface, or is it only

Re: [c-nsp] Backup edge port

Flex links may work if you wanted to do it on the switch only. You may have issues with the OS allowing you to gracefully failover between two nics in the same subnet though. Have you tried nic teaming?

Re: [c-nsp] Backup edge port

,zz Sent from my HTC - Reply message - From: Keegan Holley keegan.hol...@sungard.com To: Ibrahim Abo Zaid ibrahim.aboz...@gmail.com Cc: cisco_nsp cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Backup edge port Date: Mon, Jan 10, 2011 19:31 Flex links may work if you wanted to do it on the

Re: [c-nsp] BFD alternative

cisco...@secureobscure.com wrote: Going unnumbered has a few advantages in a PE-P and P-P environment. For starters, you can quickly control LFIB growth. See, if you were running IS-IS, you could switch on advertise passive-only -- David Freedman Group Network Engineering Claranet Group

Re: [c-nsp] stm-1/stm-4 mux

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Raymond Burkholder r...@oneunified.net wrote: List Members: is used for back haul, and STM-1s are split out for local use. It appears as though a 7206VXR G2 won't accept STM-4 natively, so I need something to split a few of the STM-1's out. Best way is

Re: [c-nsp] Backup edge port

Hi, On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 09:17:56PM +0200, Ibrahim Abo Zaid wrote: that means looking for a solution from the server side but i don't prefer , You need to have the server cooperate anyway - the server needs to know that its IP address and the corresponding subnet needs to be bound to *both*

Re: [c-nsp] Backup edge port

On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 19:44 +0100, Gert Doering wrote: On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 07:56:51PM +0200, Ibrahim Abo Zaid wrote: I have a server connected to 2 switches and need to implement ... STP won't help unless the server actually runs a *bridge* between his two ports, and you most certainly

[c-nsp] GRP vs. PRP-1

Hello All: We had a GSR with the GRP-B fall over this morning when we brought up a 3rd transit (full table) connection on the device with an Out of Memory error. We are running 3-port Gig cards with full memory and the GRP as the base. Would upgrading to a PRP with full RAM alleviate this

Re: [c-nsp] ARP strangeness

Thanks for explaining. Since the Linksys BEFRS41 does not ARP regularly, even after a DHCP RENEW and DHCP DISCOVER, and because the access gear blocks all broadcast traffic, the 7609-S will never (re-)populate its ARP entry. I'm going to see if the Linksys BEFRS41 has a configurable ARP

[c-nsp] PA-2FE-TX in 7206VXR

I just picked up a PA-2FE-TX adapter card for use in a 7206VXR router. Put it in live and the router saw it and just fine: ai-core#sh diag 6 Slot 6: Fastethernet (TX-ISL) Port adapter, 2 ports Port adapter is analyzed Port adapter insertion time 3w2d ago EEPROM

Re: [c-nsp] GRP vs. PRP-1

Hello Mike, We had a GSR with the GRP-B fall over this morning when we brought up a 3rd transit (full table) connection on the device with an Out of Memory error. We are running 3-port Gig cards with full memory and the GRP as the base. Would upgrading to a PRP with full RAM alleviate this

Re: [c-nsp] XR - propagate level 1 into level 2

On Monday, January 10, 2011 09:02:27 pm Vikas Sharma wrote: I am working on xr 3.6.2, I can see with the command propagate level 1 into level 2 there is only policy option. (config)#propagate level 1 into level 2 ? policy name But when I give following command propagate level 1 into

Re: [c-nsp] GRP vs. PRP-1

On Tue, 11 Jan 2011, Sascha Pollok wrote: The PRP-1 has much more room to put stuff in (1GB Ram) and is much faster. It still shows high CPU though when it comes to a high number of peers etc. You might consider PRP-2 in that case. But in your case PRP-1 should be perfectly fine. The GRB-P

[c-nsp] ASA ssl webvpn question

Hi all, I am in the process of reading through docs etc on this, but was hoping someone maybe has done this before and can give me a quick answer. I have an ASA running ssl vpn as well as normal remote access (cisco client based). What I am trying to do is exclude 1 particular user from using