promisc port has to be access port. So you need a loopback cable on
your access switch with two vlan numbers for your primary vlan. For
example vlan 140 and vlan 141, then your link to distribution will
still be vlan 140, 252 trunk, but one end of loopback cable would be
access vlan 140, the other
All,
I am trying to do a PVLAN implementation on one switch in a distribution /
access switch environment. Ideally, I'd like to just be able to use the
'isolated' command but we have a few devices that will need to talk to port
neighbors, so the PVLAN community would work well.
My challenge here
Can someone direct me to a document explaining how to downgrade a gsr12k
from IOX back to IOS? Or does anyone have experience with this? This is a
lab box so any way it works, works for us. Since we have multiple PCCARDs
and CFs we would be most interested in a way to switch back and forth with
You could connect a console and just leave it logging until the next
reload. I haven't seen it on switches, but I've see other boxes crash
without writing a crashinfo file. If it crashes or reloads for any
software related reason it will probably show something in the
console.
-Pete
On Tue, Jan 1
hello,
on an ASR1004 we have local accounts where the privilege level is set to 15.
when I type 'en' it still asks for the enable password. is there away to
prevent this behavior so that persons with local accounts/15 priv can execute
level 15 commands without being prompted?
we are not u
Jeff Kell wrote:
>
> On 1/11/2011 11:29 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
>> The cisco-nsp mailing list is often much more helpful than TAC.
>
> On that note... does this ring any bells?
>
> Have a 3750E that has had spurious reloads (4 since Friday), was
> switch-1 of a 3-member stack, initially was the
Are your PDU's metered? Are you near capacity? Did anything else in the
rack lose power? Usually the whole circuit drops if something like that
happens or a breaker is tripped. Is it possible it's a bad power supply?
Cisco said the outage was cause by power, but they didn't say the switch
wasn'
That, if nothing else should shut TAC up and get them into looking at another
possible source?
On 11 Jan 2011, at 20:13, Edward Beheler wrote:
> Swap power between the failing switch and another one in the stack, see if
> the problem moves?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-nsp-bou
Swap power between the failing switch and another one in the stack, see if the
problem moves?
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Kell
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 2:25 PM
To: cisco-nsp
Subject: [c-nsp
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Rodney Dunn wrote:
>
>
> On 1/11/11 11:49 AM, Keegan Holley wrote:
>
>> Possibly a stupid question, but I thought ARP had to be broadcast
>> because the mac address of the destination was unknown.
>>
>
> That is true for the first request. For subsequent arp refre
On 1/11/11 11:49 AM, Keegan Holley wrote:
Possibly a stupid question, but I thought ARP had to be broadcast
because the mac address of the destination was unknown.
That is true for the first request. For subsequent arp refreshes the
most efficient way is to unicast it.
If the CPE has
th
On 1/11/2011 11:29 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> The cisco-nsp mailing list is often much more helpful than TAC.
On that note... does this ring any bells?
Have a 3750E that has had spurious reloads (4 since Friday), was
switch-1 of a 3-member stack, initially was the master, now switch-2 has
taken
I need to configure a port-channel with multiple 10Gb interrfaces and am
wondering if anyone knew the limit of ports I could have in the same
port-channel? From what I have been able to find it appears to be 8, but I
wanted to know if anyone knew of a real-life answer. Here is the document i
found
Possibly a stupid question, but I thought ARP had to be broadcast because
the mac address of the destination was unknown. If the CPE has the correct
mac address to unicast an ARP request, why would it need to arp in the first
place? I suppose I can understand renewing the entry via unicast, but t
Nick,
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 3:03 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 10/01/2011 23:47, Chris Stone wrote:
>>
>> Any suggestions? Bad interface card maybe?
>
> This card is supported by that version of software and with that npe card.
> Did you try reseating it / checking out the pinouts / inserting
Oliver,
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:04 AM, Oliver Eyre
wrote:
> I believe you may be exceeding the availble bandwidth points for the
> chassis.
>
> First result in google for "7200 bandwidth points" should have a PDF where
> you can check how many points each interface needs.
According to the outp
We had the same thing with the same version of Modular code. (Which is the
reason why we no longer run Modular)
I'll have to dig up the bug ID, but basically it's a small memory leak that's
triggered by 'show run' or 'write term'.
If you have dual supervisors then swap to the other one and th
Ok, found the bug ID:
CSCsr12976
Ken Matlock
Network Analyst
Exempla Healthcare
(303) 467-4671
matlo...@exempla.org
From: Matlock, Kenneth L
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 6:43 AM
To: Holemans Wim; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] cpu spike
Juniper sells MX5, MX20 and MX40 bundles, all based on MX80 hardware but
with 10G ports restricted.
Talk to your nearest Juniper rep if you need more details.
Rgds
Alex
--
From: "Jeferson Guardia"
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 1:23 PM
To:
Subje
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 11:23 -0200, Jeferson Guardia wrote:
> They sell the powerful hardware with a good throughput and etc, but limited
> to what he paid. If one day he needs more capacity, he would
> pay an additional and get a new "license" and be able to have more capacity
> in terms of perform
Could you please provide more information about it? I am very interested on
getting to know about those things.
Thank you!!
2011/1/11 Jared Mauch
>
> On Jan 11, 2011, at 8:23 AM, Jeferson Guardia wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I work with other telecom geat and Ive been seeing very often the concept
On Jan 11, 2011, at 8:23 AM, Jeferson Guardia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I work with other telecom geat and Ive been seeing very often the concept of
> capacity per demand.
>
> For example:
>
> A customer buys a powerful hardware but doesnt want to pay for it, but
> someday he might need it, so what hap
Hi,
I work with other telecom geat and Ive been seeing very often the concept of
capacity per demand.
For example:
A customer buys a powerful hardware but doesnt want to pay for it, but
someday he might need it, so what happens is:
They sell the powerful hardware with a good throughput and etc,
With local user auth you can also define users to exclude them from access to
the vpn or to ssh on the asa itself.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Ryan West
Sender: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:34:54
To: dalton;
cisco-nsp@puck.
We are seeing a cpu spike (and corresponding icmp respons latency) every minute
on one of our 65XX.
It is a 6506-E with Sup32-8G running IOS version ipbasek9-vz.122-18.SXF6.
I checked al our mgmt processes (snmp requests, arp table copies,...) but found
nothing that could lead to this behavior.
Frank,
Maybe you could put it in a timeline for me as i think I'm still missing
what exactly is failing. Sorry, a bit slow the last few days.
The 7600 should send a *unicast* arp to every entry in it's arp cache 60
seconds prior to what you have the arp timer set to.
It will then send another
dalton wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am in the process of reading through docs etc on this, but was
> hoping someone maybe has done this before and can give me a quick answer.
>
> I have an ASA running ssl vpn as well as normal remote access (cisco client
> based).
> What I am trying to do is exclude 1 p
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Peter Rathlev wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 19:44 +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 07:56:51PM +0200, Ibrahim Abo Zaid wrote:
> > > I have a server connected to 2 switches and need to implement
>
> +1
>
> For Linux servers, just use bonding with the modpr
Hi Chris,
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Chris Stone wrote:
(...)
I have 2 other FastEthernet interfaces in this router as well as an
ATM DS3 - running along without issue - til now with this new
interface card anyway. Total of 4 FastEthernet interfaces - even
though the 'sh ver' above says 3. I have 2
On 10/01/2011 23:47, Chris Stone wrote:
Any suggestions? Bad interface card maybe?
This card is supported by that version of software and with that npe card.
Did you try reseating it / checking out the pinouts / inserting it into a
different slot? If that doesn't work, then I'd return to th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dalton wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am in the process of reading through docs etc on this, but was hoping
> someone maybe has done this before and
> can give me a quick answer.
>
> I have an ASA running ssl vpn as well as normal remote access (cisco client
Hola,
The PRP-1 has much more room to put stuff in (1GB Ram) and is much faster.
It still shows high CPU though when it comes to a high number of peers etc.
You might consider PRP-2 in that case. But in your case PRP-1 should be
perfectly fine.
The GRB-P is also out of support and gets no ne
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 07:04:50PM +1100, Oliver Eyre wrote:
> I believe you may be exceeding the availble bandwidth points for the
> chassis.
This will not result in the observed behaviour. It will just lead to
a warning, and potentially to packet loss (if too many interfaces are
bursting
I believe you may be exceeding the availble bandwidth points for the
chassis.
First result in google for "7200 bandwidth points" should have a PDF where
you can check how many points each interface needs.
Oliver
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@pu
34 matches
Mail list logo
