Dear Experts,
If we want to configure gateway for 1000 Vlans on Cisco 7600 (HSRP
will be a issue as it supports only 256 HSRP groups) . Any soltion for
the same -
I have though of two solutions but don't know whether they will scale
or workout , please help me in suggesting -
Solution 1 - ( I h
On 03/02/2011 09:08 AM, jack daniels wrote:
Dear Experts,
If we want to configure gateway for 1000 Vlans on Cisco 7600 (HSRP
will be a issue as it supports only 256 HSRP groups) . Any soltion for
the same -
Simply use the same group on each SVI - that is:
interface Vlan10
standby 0 ...
inte
On 02-03-11 10:08, jack daniels wrote:
> Dear Experts,
>
> If we want to configure gateway for 1000 Vlans on Cisco 7600 (HSRP
> will be a issue as it supports only 256 HSRP groups) . Any soltion for
> the same -
>
> I have though of two solutions but don't know whether they will scale
> or workou
Hi Champs,
Please help me with this :)
Regards
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 2:38 PM, jack daniels wrote:
> Dear Experts,
>
> If we want to configure gateway for 1000 Vlans on Cisco 7600 (HSRP
> will be a issue as it supports only 256 HSRP groups) . Any soltion for
> the same -
>
> I have though of t
On 02/03/11 11:52, jack daniels wrote:
Hi Champs,
Please help me with this :)
You've been given two replies; read them maybe?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://p
Lee I am using the vrf command.I have changed ny config to as below but
still unable to ping across
ROUTER A CONFIGURATIONS
interface Tunnel10
ip vrf forwarding SHAKE_MNGT
ip address 172.16.2.1 255.255.255.252
keepalive 30 3
tunnel source GigabitEthernet0
tunnel destination D.D.D.D
tunnel
Looks like Router A is an ASR1000. The gi0 Mgmt-intf isn't in the
data-plane. It is only there for out of band management. No connection
between it and the ESP.
David
--
http://dcp.dcptech.com
> -Original Message-
> From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> boun...@pu
I think you might want to check on your chassis.
Think about one of these
XR-12000/4
XR-12000/6
XR-12000/10
XR-12000/16
8 slot isn't supported w/ later releases. I'd look at E5 cards if you can
too. And a large flash drive (4gigs).
Aaron
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 12:39, Marc Binderberger wrote:
>
Hello Aaron,
true - depends what exactly you want to do. If it is just about a test router
on IOX then 12008 still works fine. If you want to test "official" then better
go for systems you could run in your production as well.
Regards, Marc
On 2011-03-02, at 4:40 PM, Aaron wrote:
> I think
I am testing BGP black hole setup in my GNS3. One AS announcing to
the other AS to black hole a prefix. I am hitting a wall where the
receiving AS shows the prefix I am trying to black hole as
inaccessible and packets gets through. I thought the basic principle
was to match routes based on commu
You also need to configure IP reverse path verify on your incoming
interface. That is what you are missing...
On Mar 2, 2011 3:58 PM, "Jay Nakamura" wrote:
> I am testing BGP black hole setup in my GNS3. One AS announcing to
> the other AS to black hole a prefix. I am hitting a wall where the
> r
That made it work. Why does that make it work? I thought
ebgp-multihop was used when the peer was not directly connected. I
will go look up the command
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Anton Turygin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> neighbor 3.0.0.1 ebgp-multihop 2
>
> on the receiving router will help.
On Wed, 2 Mar 2011, Jay Nakamura wrote:
That made it work. Why does that make it work? I thought
ebgp-multihop was used when the peer was not directly connected. I
will go look up the command
IOS "thinks" that your 192.168.255.1 is 2 hops away because it is a static
route. That is why
Hello,
neighbor 3.0.0.1 ebgp-multihop 2
on the receiving router will help.
On Wed, 2 Mar 2011, Jay Nakamura wrote:
I am testing BGP black hole setup in my GNS3. One AS announcing to
the other AS to black hole a prefix. I am hitting a wall where the
receiving AS shows the prefix I am trying
Hey guys,
Can someone please explain to me the difference between ingress and egress
queues on catalyst switches?
I always thought Ingress was traffic coming 'in' to the switch port from a
device and egress traffic coming out of the port but I don't think this is
correct?
Does a packet
Ok,
I have downgraded the XR, thanks Mikael /all.
Steps followed
1- Copy vm file to disk1
then
@ Stanby RP
unset BOOT
confreg 0x102
sync
reset
@ primary RP >>>
unset BOOT
TURBOBOOT=on,disk0,format
sync
boot disk1:comp-hfr-mini.vm-3.6.2
Regards,
Vikas
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Vika
Hi,
Is it possible to terminate PPP as well as forward ppp session on the same
box? i.e. same 7206 acts as PPP termination device and for some other
session (L2TP based) it acts as PPP forwarding device?
Regards,
Vikas
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-
> On Wed, 2 Mar 2011, Jay Nakamura wrote:
>
> > That made it work. Why does that make it work? I thought
> > ebgp-multihop was used when the peer was not directly connected. I
> > will go look up the command
>
> IOS "thinks" that your 192.168.255.1 is 2 hops away because it is a
static
>
> Is it possible to terminate PPP as well as forward ppp session on the
same
> box? i.e. same 7206 acts as PPP termination device and for some other
> session (L2TP based) it acts as PPP forwarding device?
sure? vpdn multihop comes to mind to forward l2tp sessions to another
device? you can even
19 matches
Mail list logo
