On 3/8/11 7:59 PM, "jack daniels" wrote:
>Hi guys,
>
>If I have
>
>
>Vlan100 , Vlan 2 , Vlan 3 -Trunk Dot1QCisco
>3550 Switch1 SwitchA
>
>Vlan 100 is native vlan .While frame goes out to SwitchA from
>Switch1, I want to tag the frames of native vlan also . So tha
Hi guys,
If I have
Vlan100 , Vlan 2 , Vlan 3 -Trunk Dot1QCisco
3550 Switch1 SwitchA
Vlan 100 is native vlan .While frame goes out to SwitchA from
Switch1, I want to tag the frames of native vlan also . So that on
Switch A I get tagged traffic for Vlan 100 , 2, 3
> Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 14:25:47 -0500
> From: vincent.anie...@pipelinefinancial.com
> To: danletke...@gmail.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 3560 vs 4948 shared buffer memory
>
> We replaced 3560Es that were experiencing output drops due to micro
> bursts with 4948s and
Yes, I knew there was something I was missing.Thats too bad.
Dan.
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Brandon Ewing wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 11:15:01PM -0500, Chris Evans wrote:
>> We don't use 3750 or smaller switches anymore due to this. 4948 is deemed
>> data center class so we star
We have a client wanting us to support multicast across our network(They have
multiple tails in single vrf, connected to our P/PE's(All 7200's)
(Customer is running there own RP)
As we are only provding multicast support to a single customer, On our P/PE
routers is it still necessary to enab
i've been bitten by that on this platform with other feature sets as
well; ie, IPSec, it'll let you configure the whole phase1 & phase2
components but will not do anything really.
--
Regards,
Ge Moua
Network Design Engineer
University of Minnesota | OIT - NTS
--
On 3/8/11 12:14 PM, Lobo wrot
We replaced 3560Es that were experiencing output drops due to micro
bursts with 4948s and we no longer experience the drops on the 4948s.
--Vincent
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dan Letkeman
Sent: Monday,
Hitesh Vinzoda writes:
> But the problem is How to assign the
> DNS ip addresses and default gateway or default route using
> Radius, though I m carrying wrong perception as there is as such no
> attribute in Radius which assigns DNS ip addresses from Radius. these makes
> me to think that it is
Different code trains have different limits on HSRP sessions.
This is in addition to what may be imposed for different Supervisor engines.
If you have too many for the supervisor load they will become unstable.
Mack McBride
Network Architect
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck
I have not run across the commands "network-clock-X" on a 2600. I want
to clock off this T-1 (clock source line):
!
interface ATM0/0
description Circuit ID#
no ip address
ip route-cache flow
no atm ilmi-keepalive
!
interface ATM0/0.32 point-to-point
description T1 ATM to JID Core
ip add
Thanks Phil! You're right about it not being support...silly that it
still let's you configure things but that's another argument.
I've managed to police the vlan like this now:
class-map match-any test
match any
!
policy-map test
class test
police cir 300
conform-action transm
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 11:15:01PM -0500, Chris Evans wrote:
> We don't use 3750 or smaller switches anymore due to this. 4948 is deemed
> data center class so we started using it ffor that. Haven't had any issues
> so far.
Do note that 4948 doesn't support IPv6 in hardware, and 4948E does.
--
On 08/03/11 15:43, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 08/03/11 15:33, Lobo wrote:
I've configured "mls qos vlan-based" on the two physical interfaces
just like we do on our 3750s. ME-6524 is running 12.2(33)SXH6 Advanced
IP Services. Not sure what else I can do considering that the specs
state that this fe
On 08/03/11 15:33, Lobo wrote:
I've configured "mls qos vlan-based" on the two physical interfaces
just like we do on our 3750s. ME-6524 is running 12.2(33)SXH6 Advanced
IP Services. Not sure what else I can do considering that the specs
state that this feature is support on this platform.
Ar
Anyone?
Jose
On 3/4/2011 3:52 PM, Lobo wrote:
Hey everyone. I've been trying to replicate the per-port per vlan
policing that we do on our C3750s on an ME-6524 we have in our lab but
I'm coming across a rejection by the router/switch whenever I attempt
to apply the policy-map to the SVI.
T
GLBP may be an option for you as well - it will allow some level of load
balancing between sups if your traffic is delivered to both boxes in
parallel.
I just verified it on one of my 09s w/sup2s ->
"disk0:s222-ipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF8.bin"
> 3. sup2 VRRP/HSRP limits (Andrew Jones)
>
Does anyone know if the newer 3750X series has the same problems?
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Chris Evans wrote:
> We don't use 3750 or smaller switches anymore due to this. 4948 is deemed
> data center class so we started using it ffor that. Haven't had any issues
> so far.
> On Mar 7, 20
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 05:55:25PM +1100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> Eg. If I have Gi2/1.300 with encapsulation dot1Q 300, I can't have Gi2/2
> with encapsulation dot1Q 300. Is that right?
Always keep in mind that this is a *Switch* with routing intelligence
bolted on. There's only a single globa
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 01:54:34AM -0500, Christopher Cook wrote:
> There's no issues (that I've had) with mixing VRRP and HSRP on the
> same router.
On Sup720, this works.
On Sup2 (what the Subject: says we're talking about), it's not supported,
you can't even config it.
gert
--
USEN
On 08/03/11 06:55, Andrew Jones wrote:
Thanks guys, that's really helpful. Do you have any information on how
many subinterfaces the 6500/SUP2 will support? I found another thread on
this mailing list where someone was saying that you can't re-use VLAN IDs,
even when using subints.
Eg. If I hav
Chris,
This isn't true; I have production devices that have VRRP and HSRP running
at the same time (different interfaces of course). Reusing VRRP/HSRP group
numbers has not been a problem for us; HSRPv2 of course allows you to have
a group number per SVI if you wish.
On a Sup2? I dont think
Hi all,
I am trying to assign the ip address to pppoe client using Radius. The
scenario is basically we will have pppoe clients (Not Cisco AFAIK) and they
will authenticated against FreeRadius from LNS. I tried to find out some
documentation about it but found none.
Especially i have seen sce
22 matches
Mail list logo
