Hello folks
Does anybody have any experience of poor performance (very low
throughput limitation) when using vlan-mapping in 12.2SX?
switchport vlan mapping enable
switchport vlan mapping 70 770
switchport vlan mapping 71 771
I've had is configured in two different scenarios, both on 12.2SX
On 04/05/2011 09:23 AM, Daniel Holme wrote:
Hello folks
Does anybody have any experience of poor performance (very low
throughput limitation) when using vlan-mapping in 12.2SX?
switchport vlan mapping enable
switchport vlan mapping 70 770
switchport vlan mapping 71 771
We've used it
On 5 April 2011 09:51, Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
On 04/05/2011 09:23 AM, Daniel Holme wrote:
Hello folks
Does anybody have any experience of poor performance (very low
throughput limitation) when using vlan-mapping in 12.2SX?
switchport vlan mapping enable
switchport
On 5/04/2011 7:33 PM, Daniel Holme wrote:
On 5 April 2011 09:51, Phil Mayersp.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
On 04/05/2011 09:23 AM, Daniel Holme wrote:
Hello folks
Does anybody have any experience of poor performance (very low
throughput limitation) when using vlan-mapping in 12.2SX?
On 5 April 2011 10:49, Reuben Farrelly reuben-cisco-...@reub.net wrote:
Approximately 200kbit/s throughput.
Sounds somewhat like the translation is being punted to software/CPU rather
than done in hardware. I was seeing similar figures when I was working the
CPU hard to do a similar setup,
Hi Vikas.
Checkout the show controllers pse tcam family of commands. They are
not documented in the XR12k command reference but do work. Look at
Advanced System Command Reference/ASIC Driver Commands on the CRS-1
(or ASR9k) for a command reference.
The commands don't give you the exact number of
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, arulgobinath emmanuel wrote:
out of order could be a major headache, and throughput could suffer
greatly. I haven't tried nor experience in similar setup according to my
search MLPPP designed to handle the out of order packet (rfc1990) but it
can impact the router
If I have a following setup:
http://img203.imageshack.us/img203/4485/mtuj.png ..and I would like to
have connection between server1 and server2 over Ethernet v2 using
MTU 9000 bytes. I have few general questions regarding MTU:
1) as I understand, frames larger than MTU are automatically
If I have a following setup:
http://img203.imageshack.us/img203/4485/mtuj.png ..and I would like to
have connection between server1 and server2 over Ethernet v2 using
MTU 9000 bytes. I have few general questions regarding MTU:
1) as I understand, frames larger than MTU are automatically
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Martin T wrote:
1) as I understand, frames larger than MTU are automatically
fragmented by switch.
No, generally this is only done by routers, not on L2-switches.
Usually the packet is dropped.
2) when we talk about MTU(standard Ethernet v2 frame 1500B, jumbo frames
There are some restrictions on the match statement in the policy-map for
what is going to be hardware switched. Could it be related to this?
* Policy-based routing (PBR) with hardware assist for route-map
sequences that use the *match ip address*, *set ip next-hop*, and *set
ip default
HI guys,
can you guide me if 1588V2 (boundry and transparent clock ) suppport
on cisco 7600 + cisco 12K
can you guide me if 1588V2 (boundry and transparent clock ) suppport
on Juniper M120 and M320.
Regards
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
hi all,
i can't find any useful information about connecting ASA 8.4
etherchannels to 2 different nexus7K, where the 2 nexus devices are
aggregating channels with vPC.
the idea is to trunk inside, outside and failover vlan to ASA and let
it manage routing between them.
no L3 dynamic routing
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 14:27:18, Federico Cossu wrote:
Subject: [c-nsp] asa 8.4 + etherchannel + nexus7k
hi all,
i can't find any useful information about connecting ASA 8.4
etherchannels to
2 different nexus7K, where the 2 nexus devices are aggregating
channels with vPC.
the idea is
[ASA] configuration guide cites only vss, not vpc unfortunately.
From the ASA point of view, two C6K running VSS and two N7K running vPC both
look like a single LACP partner. For the ASA, there's no difference if it's
a VSS pair or a vPC pair.
-A
___
15 matches
Mail list logo