[c-nsp] 12.2SX vlan-mapping

2011-04-05 Thread Daniel Holme
Hello folks Does anybody have any experience of poor performance (very low throughput limitation) when using vlan-mapping in 12.2SX? switchport vlan mapping enable switchport vlan mapping 70 770 switchport vlan mapping 71 771 I've had is configured in two different scenarios, both on 12.2SX

Re: [c-nsp] 12.2SX vlan-mapping

2011-04-05 Thread Phil Mayers
On 04/05/2011 09:23 AM, Daniel Holme wrote: Hello folks Does anybody have any experience of poor performance (very low throughput limitation) when using vlan-mapping in 12.2SX? switchport vlan mapping enable switchport vlan mapping 70 770 switchport vlan mapping 71 771 We've used it

Re: [c-nsp] 12.2SX vlan-mapping

2011-04-05 Thread Daniel Holme
On 5 April 2011 09:51, Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote: On 04/05/2011 09:23 AM, Daniel Holme wrote: Hello folks Does anybody have any experience of poor performance (very low throughput limitation) when using vlan-mapping in 12.2SX?  switchport vlan mapping enable  switchport

Re: [c-nsp] 12.2SX vlan-mapping

2011-04-05 Thread Reuben Farrelly
On 5/04/2011 7:33 PM, Daniel Holme wrote: On 5 April 2011 09:51, Phil Mayersp.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote: On 04/05/2011 09:23 AM, Daniel Holme wrote: Hello folks Does anybody have any experience of poor performance (very low throughput limitation) when using vlan-mapping in 12.2SX?

Re: [c-nsp] 12.2SX vlan-mapping

2011-04-05 Thread Daniel Holme
On 5 April 2011 10:49, Reuben Farrelly reuben-cisco-...@reub.net wrote: Approximately 200kbit/s throughput. Sounds somewhat like the translation is being punted to software/CPU rather than done in hardware.  I was seeing similar figures when I was working the CPU hard to do a similar setup,

Re: [c-nsp] similar command sh mls cef max-route on 12k

2011-04-05 Thread Per Carlson
Hi Vikas. Checkout the show controllers pse tcam family of commands. They are not documented in the XR12k command reference but do work. Look at Advanced System Command Reference/ASIC Driver Commands on the CRS-1 (or ASR9k) for a command reference. The commands don't give you the exact number of

Re: [c-nsp] Dual OC3 - Separate Carrier - Load-balancing 7201

2011-04-05 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, arulgobinath emmanuel wrote: out of order could be a major headache, and throughput could suffer greatly. I haven't tried nor experience in similar setup according to my search MLPPP designed to handle the out of order packet (rfc1990) but it can impact the router

[c-nsp] general questions regarding MTU

2011-04-05 Thread Martin T
If I have a following setup: http://img203.imageshack.us/img203/4485/mtuj.png ..and I would like to have connection between server1 and server2 over Ethernet v2 using MTU 9000 bytes. I have few general questions regarding MTU: 1) as I understand, frames larger than MTU are automatically

Re: [c-nsp] general questions regarding MTU

2011-04-05 Thread sthaug
If I have a following setup: http://img203.imageshack.us/img203/4485/mtuj.png ..and I would like to have connection between server1 and server2 over Ethernet v2 using MTU 9000 bytes. I have few general questions regarding MTU: 1) as I understand, frames larger than MTU are automatically

Re: [c-nsp] general questions regarding MTU

2011-04-05 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Martin T wrote: 1) as I understand, frames larger than MTU are automatically fragmented by switch. No, generally this is only done by routers, not on L2-switches. Usually the packet is dropped. 2) when we talk about MTU(standard Ethernet v2 frame 1500B, jumbo frames

Re: [c-nsp] 12.2SX vlan-mapping

2011-04-05 Thread Claes Jansson
There are some restrictions on the match statement in the policy-map for what is going to be hardware switched. Could it be related to this? * Policy-based routing (PBR) with hardware assist for route-map sequences that use the *match ip address*, *set ip next-hop*, and *set ip default

[c-nsp] syncee and 1588

2011-04-05 Thread jack daniels
HI guys, can you guide me if 1588V2 (boundry and transparent clock ) suppport on cisco 7600 + cisco 12K can you guide me if 1588V2 (boundry and transparent clock ) suppport on Juniper M120 and M320. Regards ___ cisco-nsp mailing list

[c-nsp] asa 8.4 + etherchannel + nexus7k

2011-04-05 Thread Federico Cossu
hi all, i can't find any useful information about connecting ASA 8.4 etherchannels to 2 different nexus7K, where the 2 nexus devices are aggregating channels with vPC. the idea is to trunk inside, outside and failover vlan to ASA and let it manage routing between them. no L3 dynamic routing

Re: [c-nsp] asa 8.4 + etherchannel + nexus7k

2011-04-05 Thread Ryan West
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 14:27:18, Federico Cossu wrote: Subject: [c-nsp] asa 8.4 + etherchannel + nexus7k hi all, i can't find any useful information about connecting ASA 8.4 etherchannels to 2 different nexus7K, where the 2 nexus devices are aggregating channels with vPC. the idea is

Re: [c-nsp] asa 8.4 + etherchannel + nexus7k

2011-04-05 Thread Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists
[ASA] configuration guide cites only vss, not vpc unfortunately. From the ASA point of view, two C6K running VSS and two N7K running vPC both look like a single LACP partner. For the ASA, there's no difference if it's a VSS pair or a vPC pair. -A ___