Re: [c-nsp] SFP module on 2921 ISR router

2011-06-07 Thread Piotr Wojciechowski
On 6/6/11 18:35 , K bharathan wrote: hi i'm trying to use a 1000base SFP module in cisco 2921 ISR ; on the router SFP appears to be assigned to G0/1; but when i put a SFP-LX-SM module nothing happens; no lights no connectivity and int is not coming up; is there any configuration required to

Re: [c-nsp] VPN for Android

2011-06-07 Thread LM
I did it with L2TP against a router, I posted the config here: https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2012285 El 31/05/11 12:47, Justin M. Streiner escribió: On Tue, 31 May 2011, Soon Lee wrote: Is anyone who success to connect vpn for Android on ASA or router? I tried it with ASA L2TP but i

[c-nsp] SCE2020

2011-06-07 Thread Mohammad Khalil
Hi , is there an possible way that the SCE could limit the number of download sessions ? or limit the download rate per session ? Thanks ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] cat6500/fwsm performance

2011-06-07 Thread David White, Jr. (dwhitejr)
Hi Jeff, The 30 us is for 'small' packets. As packet size increases, latency also increases. For a normal mix of packet sizes, you should see latency around 50 us. However, 'normal' is also a bit subjective based on traffic flows in your network. Sincerely, David. Jeff Bacon wrote: I am,

Re: [c-nsp] ASA failover - possible with a /30 ?

2011-06-07 Thread David White, Jr. (dwhitejr)
Hi Jeff, The Standby IP is used to monitor both interfaces (the interface on the Active and the one on the Standby). Failover will work without a standby IP, but the ASA will not be able to detect failure conditions on that interface, unless the failure condition results in a link down. If a

[c-nsp] Massive increase of ignored errors on 7200 after upgrade to 12.2SRE3

2011-06-07 Thread Sigurbjörn Birkir Lárusson
Hello there, We are still running quite a few 7200s for low-bitrate traffic in various places. After upgrade to SRE3 we've been noticing a huge increase in input errors on the 7200s (input errors counting as ignored packets). This is classic microburst behaviour, however it seems to have

[c-nsp] vs upgrading Nexus 5000 and 2000

2011-06-07 Thread Arne Larsen / Region Nordjylland
Hi all When upgrading a Nexus5K setup with dual homed extenders, is it possible to control the reboot of the extender. If I put the installation into pending mode, and upgrade one of the 5K's, can I then reboot them one by one. We are going from 4.1.3 to 5.0.2 /Arne

Re: [c-nsp] VPN for Android

2011-06-07 Thread Brandon Ewing
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 06:47:46AM -0400, Justin M. Streiner wrote: On Tue, 31 May 2011, Soon Lee wrote: Is anyone who success to connect vpn for Android on ASA or router? I tried it with ASA L2TP but i couldnt. Pls let me know. Thanks. I've heard of people doing things to get a working

Re: [c-nsp] vs upgrading Nexus 5000 and 2000

2011-06-07 Thread krunal shah
Do not use 5.0.2 check following. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/sw/5_x/nx-os/deferral/Deferral_Notice_N7K_502.html You can shut down the Fex portchannel interfaces on the switch upgrade the code on switch. This way you can save some traffic disruption. Krunal On Tue, Jun

Re: [c-nsp] vs upgrading Nexus 5000 and 2000

2011-06-07 Thread krunal shah
My bad URL was for Nexus 7K. Not 5K. Krunal On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:15 PM, krunal shah krun.s...@gmail.com wrote: Do not use 5.0.2 check following. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/sw/5_x/nx-os/deferral/Deferral_Notice_N7K_502.html You can shut down the Fex portchannel

[c-nsp] Limiting Tacacs groups per device

2011-06-07 Thread Brian Raaen
We have a situation where we have two groups of engineers. One set needs full access to all customer devices we manage. The second set needs full access to most devices we manage except where the customer has requested they not make config changes. I am working with a server admin to set up a

Re: [c-nsp] Limiting Tacacs groups per device

2011-06-07 Thread Mohammad Khalil
Try to implement authorization sets in order to limit the access to the routers http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps2086/products_configuration_example09186a00808d9138.shtml BR, Mohammad Khalil Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 20:19:33 + From: opsli...@rhemasound.org To:

Re: [c-nsp] Limiting Tacacs groups per device

2011-06-07 Thread Peter Rathlev
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 20:19 +, Brian Raaen wrote: We have a situation where we have two groups of engineers. One set needs full access to all customer devices we manage. The second set needs full access to most devices we manage except where the customer has requested they not make config

[c-nsp] QOS testing traffic generator and reporter

2011-06-07 Thread Peter Kranz
Looking for an opensource/free package that can generate several data streams with different source IPs and data rates to similar different users that also have a receiver function that can display the real-time BW received for each stream. Testing several different QoS implementations, where the

Re: [c-nsp] vs upgrading Nexus 5000 and 2000

2011-06-07 Thread John Gill
Hello Arne, This section in the upgrade guide is made just for the situation where you want a minimal downtime on the FEX, about 2 minutes as opposed to the 5 it takes for a N5k to reload:

Re: [c-nsp] Memory leak on in latest 12.0S on GSR? *Solved*

2011-06-07 Thread Aaron
XR works just fine with prp-2 On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 13:06, Mack McBride mack.mcbr...@viawest.com wrote: The GSR is still a solid supported platform, unfortunately the support contracts are completely out of line with where the GSR fits in the grand scheme of things. The newer PRP-3 cards

Re: [c-nsp] Memory leak on in latest 12.0S on GSR? *Solved*

2011-06-07 Thread Mack McBride
We ran into a number of issues with the continuous writes killing the flash and other flash related issues. The other issue we ran into was unacceptably long reboot times. We also found the code conversion was unacceptably long. Cisco highly recommends the PRP-3. Our experience was that XR on the

[c-nsp] Cacti Monitoring Uptime Interface

2011-06-07 Thread == Nicky ==
Dear All, Currently I use cacti for monitoring the whole my infrastructure. Need your oppinion for monitoring uptime each My Core Router Interfaces. I already search cacti template for monitoring interface uptime int persentace but i have no luck :) I thank you in advace for helping .