Re: [c-nsp] sup2T software & release notes have hit

2011-07-18 Thread Phil Mayers
On 07/19/2011 02:23 AM, Tony Varriale wrote: Well, neither of those (I'm sure of the 6708 and almost 100% on the 6716) actually have a CFC and the DFC is not a FRU. Hence, the issue. You're correct that both the 6708 and 6716 do not come with / cannot use a CFC, but they differ w.r.t. DFC4 up

Re: [c-nsp] sup2T software & release notes have hit

2011-07-18 Thread Phil Mayers
On 07/19/2011 02:25 AM, Tony Varriale wrote: Well I had the pleasure of watching one boot last night and I'm not very optimistic as to my original statement. No word back from Cisco yet to confirm. How long did it take to boot? Was it faster than the glacial 300 second average for a sup720?

Re: [c-nsp] sup2T software & release notes have hit

2011-07-18 Thread Tony Varriale
On 7/17/2011 5:10 AM, Gert Doering wrote: Hi, On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 10:12:32AM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote: It's unlikely to be based on NX-OS. However, XE == IOS running as process on linux and -modular == IOS running as process on QNX, so it could relatively easily be a variety of one of th

Re: [c-nsp] sup2T software & release notes have hit

2011-07-18 Thread Tony Varriale
On 7/18/2011 5:39 AM, Phil Mayers wrote: On 12/07/11 00:25, Saku Ytti wrote: I don't see any reason why technically you couldn't just rip out DFC from 6708 and run it as centralized card. Maybe the DFC itself is soldered in making this unpractical or maybe centralized performance was deemed by

Re: [c-nsp] Burned up 2790

2011-07-18 Thread Tristan Gulyas
Hi, The newer hardware revisions on some of these switches use a different style of solid state capacitor which does not get affected by this "capacitor plague". I've seen this on the 3750G switches hundreds of times. Any we've RMA'd for the issue have been replaced with newer hardware revisio

Re: [c-nsp] WiSM support on 12.2SXI?

2011-07-18 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011, Alan Buxey wrote: wism with SXI all okay here - you need to move to the new WISM control method (wism service-vlan xxx ) - rather than the old manual port-channel configuration method (though I think thats been true for a while) - you may also need to have a particular code-

Re: [c-nsp] sup2T software & release notes have hit

2011-07-18 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 03:20:47PM -0400, Jeff Kell wrote: > You can probably "play" Dike Nukem Forever on Modular IOS by the > time they finish adding bells and whistles to it. Now *that* would be an interesting feature - a nice nvidia graphics engine on board of the Sup-2T, being used to

Re: [c-nsp] sup2T software & release notes have hit

2011-07-18 Thread Jeff Kell
On 7/18/2011 3:12 PM, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 08:17:56PM +0200, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote: >> Sup2T will have IOS-XE Sometime Later(TM). > > "There will be modular IOS for 6500!!" > > Call me unconvinced. > > ... I'll go and play Duke Nukem Forever in the meantime.

Re: [c-nsp] sup2T software & release notes have hit

2011-07-18 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 08:17:56PM +0200, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote: > Sup2T will have IOS-XE Sometime Later(TM). "There will be modular IOS for 6500!!" Call me unconvinced. ... I'll go and play Duke Nukem Forever in the meantime... gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of

Re: [c-nsp] sup2T software & release notes have hit

2011-07-18 Thread Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists
> XE is what the rumors told me the Sup2T would be based upon, but > IOS versions like "12.2(50)SY" very much sound like IOS-trains. It is IOS. Sup2T will have IOS-XE Sometime Later(TM). -A ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https:/

[c-nsp] setting caller ID on sip calls (Cisco iad 2400)

2011-07-18 Thread Scott Granados
Hi, I’m trying to set the outbound caller ID correctly when placing a call from a Cisco IAD 2400. I have the following dial-peer entry dial-peer voice 803 voip description "E911 calling" translation-profile outgoing STRIP9 destination-pattern 9911 session protocol sipv2 session target ipv4:a.b.

[c-nsp] finding unicast flooding in Wireshark sniff

2011-07-18 Thread Rogelio
I've got several L2TP tunnels hitting a Cisco 7201 and am trying to use Wireshark to determine what inside my tunnel responsible queue drops on one of interface responsible for the L2TP termination. I inserted a Wireshark laptop in a hub between the LAC and the LNS, and I got a good 24 hour sniff

Re: [c-nsp] 1841 dumps to rommon only on power failure

2011-07-18 Thread Chuck Church
I've seen rommon updates that deal with flash access timing on a lot of the ISRs. Might be something to check out. Chuck On Jul 18, 2011 5:58 AM, "Henry-Nicolas Tourneur" < hntourn...@autempspourmoi.be> wrote: > I would say: your issue sounds to be physical not software related. > Probably there'

Re: [c-nsp] sup2T software & release notes have hit

2011-07-18 Thread Phil Mayers
On 12/07/11 00:25, Saku Ytti wrote: I don't see any reason why technically you couldn't just rip out DFC from 6708 and run it as centralized card. Maybe the DFC itself is soldered in making this unpractical or maybe centralized performance was deemed by BU unmarketable. My understanding was it

Re: [c-nsp] 1841 dumps to rommon only on power failure

2011-07-18 Thread Henry-Nicolas Tourneur
I would say: your issue sounds to be physical not software related. Probably there's some weird happening on your power circuit when it goes down, otherwise you should have the same issue with the power switch. Since it's hard to say what happens when your power source goes down, it'll be hard for

Re: [c-nsp] sup2T software & release notes have hit

2011-07-18 Thread Alan Buxey
hi, i raised a few questions regarding the current release notes and sup2T documentation and the doc is now edited to make clear the legacy PVST and what the Sup2T supports. alan ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.

Re: [c-nsp] 1841 dumps to rommon only on power failure

2011-07-18 Thread Peter Rathlev
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 08:19 +0300, techt...@gmail.com wrote: > Please share your config and dir command for your flash, it's probably > related to the location of the image file. Hmm... It's sad that when Vinny actually took precautions to avoid answers like these they still appear. Please re-read