We use netflow export on our 6500's equipped with WS-X6704-10GE's and
DFC3CXL and have no problem with it. Each device is exporting aprox. 15
Mbps of flows during peak hours.
Current IOS being used is SXI5, but haven't had a problem with other
releases..
Jiri
Dne 12.8.2011 6:39,
Jiri,
can you tell me exactly full version of IOS and config for netflow
that you are running.
Stas Bakulin
--
og...@kvant-telecom.ru | www.kvant-telecom.ru
Tel: +7 473 233 0330 (128)
On 12 August 2011 13:19, Jiri Prochazka
On Thursday, August 11, 2011 09:42:39 PM Bradley Williamson
wrote:
We are looking at Brocade, Cisco, and Juniper for a
couple of upcoming projects and I am familiar with both
Cisco and Juniper, but not so much with Brocade. We have
a few of their small switches in our network, but that’s
On Friday, August 12, 2011 01:59:27 AM Saku Ytti wrote:
I'm personally not seeing cisco tax myself. When I look
boxes which meet my demand, everything is available
roughly in same price range, assuming sales droid can
realistically expect you to choose something else than
Cisco.
And what
On Friday, August 12, 2011 03:52:44 PM Gert Doering wrote:
Recently, OS and TAC support quality at Juniper seriously
went down the drain, so the original reason to want
Juniper high quality operating system and very
motivated company to iron out the remaining wrinkles
seems to have been
Stas,
version of ios is following - s72033_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9_WAN-M
(s72033-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXI5.bin)
NetFlow config -
sitel-trans-6503#show run | Inc flow
ip flow-cache entries 256000
ip flow-cache timeout inactive 60
ip flow-cache timeout active 1
ip flow-capture vlan-id
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:17 PM, le luu le2...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have a ASA5520 always has very high CPU 95% - 98% almost all time even that
traffic goes thru the ASA is low.
Anyone knows why ?
No. It's impossible to say, based on the limited amount of information
you've provided.
Hi All,
Just a quick question to the group.
We are about to deploy a few of our routers 'back to back' with the MPLS
service providers routers. We will be doing all the markings on our routers
and the SP router will be honouring the markings and ensuring QoS toward the
MPLS. Since we will
Does anyone have any thoughts on this at all? Known Cisco bug?
I really doubt it's the service-policy, as the policy is running on the
Port-Channel right now with no problem. IS-IS only stops working across the
interface when I add the mls qos trust dscp command to it.
I have the exact same
On Friday, August 12, 2011 07:39:50 PM harbor235 wrote:
Mark,
Can you elaborate on the ipv6 sw issues? We have some
Foundry and we are getting ready
for a limited ipv6 rollout?
There was no v6 support for IS-IS when we tested some
classic Foundry and new Brocade units back in '09. Not
On Friday, August 12, 2011 09:31:08 PM Lars Eidsheim wrote:
I am planning to upgrade our BGP edge from a Cisco
7200/NPE-G1. The NPE-G1 suits our needs at the moment,
but as we are looking to interconnect with more
services, do more localpeerings and implement IPv6 in
near future this might a
Hi Brad,
I am not sure that FlexLink is safer than BPDU filter in any way. As
the Configuration Guide points out, FlexLink will disable STP on the
interface and it's required to ensure a loop-free topology.
A port with BPDU filter is behaving in the same way as one with
FlexLink because neither
Hi Ruslan,
Try upgrading the ROMMON to at least 12.2(31r)SGA4 or if possible to
12.2(44r)SG5.
Best regards,
Andras
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Ruslan Pustovoytov ru...@inbox.ru wrote:
Hi all
I need for digital diagnostic monitoring 10GE ports on Catalyst 4948 10GE
switch.
I check
Hi Ruslan,
Try upgrading the ROMMON to at least 12.2(31r)SGA4 or if possible to
12.2(44r)SG5.
Best regards,
Andras
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Ruslan Pustovoitov
ru...@mostelekom.net wrote:
Hi all
I need for digital diagnostic monitoring 10GE ports on Catalyst 4948
10GE switch.
I
If it helps, recently upgraded the corporate from a 7206 to 3925 for the
corporate 1GB connection which works well and has no performance issues, full
bgp table.
Also using 7604s for the diverse production ISPs 10GB connex also no issues,
full bgp table.
Installed and forgotten.
Cisco
I am looking for the best way to get around IP conflicts (On the Far Side)
in fully redundant Hardware solution. I am working in a large Scale Hosted
application environment and every 5th or so customer has the same RFC1918
Address that every other small shop has. I have a Pair of ASA 5520's
Let me add that my point is more about the rare situation when a
downstream port on the blade switch gets connected (looped) with one
of the upstream FEX switches, then you might face a loop.
FlexLink is indeed better when you have 2 uplinks and you don't want
them both to be active at the same
Hi all
How can I create the 802.1q vlan in cisco switch?
How can I put the tag and untag on the port.
ls it same as native vlan?
Thank you so much
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Hi
If you want to enable 802.1q in one switch port via CLI for example for
GigabitEthernet1/0/5:
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/5
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 2,800 { 2 and 800 are the VLANIDs included in
this 802.1q link, vlan tag in L2}
switchport mode
Deric -
How about you engage in some RTFM (Read-The-Fucking-Manual) and Use-Goolge!
You have tried it here before, tried it on NANOG last week: lo ping,
spamming-tree, connection-disappearing...! enough said!
Deric *wants-to-know* and *NOW* but Deric doesn't know what he wants to know.
./Randy
Hey Brent--
I used to manage ASAs for several customers and ran into this frequently
when they had IPsec LAN to LAN tunnels to their partners, software
developers and the like. I resolved this problem by translating the
destination subnet on my side of the tunnel. Just used another nat
21 matches
Mail list logo
