Re: [c-nsp] 6rd on ASR1k

2011-10-14 Thread Ruslan Pustovoitov
Hi Harold ! This is my config relevant to 6rd. Also, I don't know how to debug packets with protocol 41 in IP payload in ASR. Debug in form debug ip packet #access-list do not working for non software routers. interface Loopback10 description 6RD_Relay ip address 192.88.99.127

Re: [c-nsp] Faster BGP Failover

2011-10-14 Thread Peter Rathlev
On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 12:02 +0800, Mark Tinka wrote: The Usage Guidelines for IOS 12.2 Routing Protocols do not mention any, but there must be a reason why it's not default. Or isn't there? Well, we haven't any problems with it. And I now see that 15.1(2)S has it enabled by default.

Re: [c-nsp] zx sfp with DOM

2011-10-14 Thread Phil Mayers
On 10/14/2011 12:43 AM, Walter Keen wrote: Anyone have recommendations for 3rd party DOM ZX singlemode sfp for 7600 series routers running 12.2(33)SRE* code? Have a non-DOM optic and have issues with that link, looking for reporting that a DOM optic would give such as light levels, etc.

Re: [c-nsp] DHCP with superscopes

2011-10-14 Thread Phil Mayers
On 10/14/2011 12:55 AM, Srikanth Tallapragada wrote: I have a requirement where I need DHCP working for secondary IP address configured on a SVI.We have the both the subnets configured as superscope on DHCP server.And i have following configs on my nexus switches which are running VRRP.The DHCP

Re: [c-nsp] Faster BGP Failover

2011-10-14 Thread Phil Mayers
On 10/14/2011 05:17 AM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote: I agree that it should be default these days (it is in XR NX-OS), but so should be lower spf/lsa-throttle timers. Honestly, if you guys were to get into changing the defaults, I think no ip proxy-arp should really be top of the list

Re: [c-nsp] Faster BGP Failover

2011-10-14 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 08:31:26AM +0100, Phil Mayers wrote: Honestly, if you guys were to get into changing the defaults, I think no ip proxy-arp should really be top of the list ;o) +2173 gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!

[c-nsp] tr69 with DHCP

2011-10-14 Thread Thomas Sillaber
Guys, we are testing tr69 on 800 Series and run into the following problem. When configuring a static ip address under cwmp context or at the interface the tr69 agent is trying to connect to the acs. After enabling DHCP on the wan interface the interface receives an valid ip address, but the

Re: [c-nsp] Faster BGP Failover

2011-10-14 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 14/10/2011 05:17, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote: in most cases we rather not change defaults (yes, I know, there have been too many cases where we did, incl. without notice), that 18 month period where mop enabled was turned on still leaves me scratching my head. Nick

Re: [c-nsp] Faster BGP Failover

2011-10-14 Thread Tim Franklin
in most cases we rather not change defaults (yes, I know, there have been too many cases where we did, incl. without notice) Wonder of hindsight I know, but the recent bump of *3* major version numbers would have been a really good place to clean out a whole bunch of defaults that are no

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS on a pair of 7201's

2011-10-14 Thread Amir Chaudhri
Thanks All, I think my Issue is the IOS I am running, (c7200p-ipbase-mz.124-4.XD10.bin) as it doesn¹t support any of the MPLS commands, I did a search on the Cisco Feature Navigator and it points to this IOS version (c7200p-adventerprisek9_sna-mz.151-4.M.bin) would this one do it?

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS on a pair of 7201's

2011-10-14 Thread Arie Vayner (avayner)
Another option would be to go with 12.2(33)SRE (latest) or even a more recent 15.1S release (15.1S is what comes after SRE... It's just a renumbering that happened about a year ago...) Arie -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] 6rd on ASR1k

2011-10-14 Thread Harold Ritter
Ruslan, Just to make sure, do you have a default route on the 6rd client pointing at the 6rd BR? Since you are pinging the ASR1k itself, could you please run a deb ipv6 icmp on the ASR to see if the ICMP packets are received. Regards Le 11-10-14 01:57, « Ruslan Pustovoitov »

Re: [c-nsp] strange ARP issue, 40K worth of entries

2011-10-14 Thread Kasper Adel
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a00800ef7b2.shtml On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote: Turn off proxy arp on the interface. Make sure routes are pointed at an ip or ip+interface and not just the interface for default first.

Re: [c-nsp] Large number of arp entries on 2960G

2011-10-14 Thread Kasper Adel
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a00800ef7b2.shtml On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 4:28 AM, Geoff Falk geoff_f...@yahoo.com wrote: Do you have any sort of default gateway set on the 2960G? (ip default-gateway blah). The only time I've seen this on a L2 switch is when

Re: [c-nsp] EoMPLS on a pair of 7201's

2011-10-14 Thread Chris Hunt
On 10/14/2011 7:10 AM, cisco-nsp-requ...@puck.nether.net wrote: Message: 7 Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:38:44 +0200 From: Arie Vayner (avayner) avay...@cisco.com To: Amir Chaudhri amir.chaud...@ascertiva.com, e...@edgeoc.net, cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net, cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [c-nsp] zx sfp with DOM

2011-10-14 Thread Walter Keen
It's on a 6724-SFP... Thanks On 10/14/2011 12:25 AM, Phil Mayers wrote: On 10/14/2011 12:43 AM, Walter Keen wrote: Anyone have recommendations for 3rd party DOM ZX singlemode sfp for 7600 series routers running 12.2(33)SRE* code? Have a non-DOM optic and have issues with that link, looking

[c-nsp] Request for participation - Arbor 2011 Worldwide Infrastructure Security Report.

2011-10-14 Thread Dobbins, Roland
[Apologies if you've already seen this announcement in other forums.] Request for participation - Arbor 2011 Worldwide Infrastructure Security Report. - Folks, We're in the process of collecting survey responses for the 2011 Worldwide Infrastructure Security Report (WWISR); this is the

Re: [c-nsp] zx sfp with DOM

2011-10-14 Thread Gary Buhrmaster
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 07:25, Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote: At least on the 6500 (which is closely related to 7600) LAN cards, DOM is absent - for example on 6748-SFP. No convincing explanation has ever been given AFAIK; it just doesn't do it, with ANY transceiver. My

Re: [c-nsp] 1Gig-10Gig port-channel migration

2011-10-14 Thread Pete Templin
On 10/13/11 10:24 AM, Phil Mayers wrote: On 13/10/11 16:03, Tim Durack wrote: Next best idea is to migrate the 1Gig port-channel to Po2, and create a new Po1 with 10Gig links (I would like to maintain Po1 as the pop backbone.) Use this opportunity to determine the STP impact. Move links

[c-nsp] OpenNMS with Cisco 7606

2011-10-14 Thread msprouff...@yahoo.com
Just wanted to see if anybody uses this for monitoring and if they have been successful in getting interface descriptions in their snmp traps. I am unable to get the descriptions and I could use a little help from the group on this one. Michael Sprouffske

[c-nsp] ASR9k CWDM Optics

2011-10-14 Thread cisconsp
Good evening everyone, We have a requirement to use passive CWDM boxes (limited dark fiber) between 3 sites within the same metro area for point to point 10gig connections, and are wondering what CWDM optics are compatible with our ASR 9006 routers. The cisco pricing tool does not display any

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9k CWDM Optics

2011-10-14 Thread Matt Addison
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 20:52, cisco...@secureobscure.com wrote: Good evening everyone, We have a requirement to use passive CWDM boxes (limited dark fiber) between 3 sites within the same metro area for point to point 10gig connections, and are wondering what CWDM optics are compatible