Re: [c-nsp] rate-limit problem 7206VXR

2012-01-11 Thread Christian Kratzer
Hi, On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Paul Stewart wrote: Thanks very much.. We did reboot it a few weeks back - we find we need to kick these boxes about once a year or other weird stuff happens ;) I missed the fact that it is only showing INPUT - good catch and I will follow up on that. Nothing

Re: [c-nsp] Considerations for future IPv6 with vrf-lite on ME3400E

2012-01-11 Thread Mark Tinka
On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 07:01:47 AM Christopher J. Pilkington wrote: Are there any particular pitfalls we should watch for with this configuration w.r.t. rolling out IPv6 in the future? For this one, certainly best to check with your SE. Since the ME3400 has VRF-Lite for v4 today, it

[c-nsp] Reply:RE: why vpls need some special line cards to support

2012-01-11 Thread ying-xiang
Hi Arie, EoMPLS dosen't need to perform MAC learning or MAC look up for forwarding packets.so EoMPLS function can be implement even without a advanced egress line card.is that right?! Thanks a lot! At 2012-01-10 03:28:07,Arie Vayner (avayner) avay...@cisco.com wrote: In VPLS, we need to

Re: [c-nsp] Reply:RE: why vpls need some special line cards to support

2012-01-11 Thread Phil Mayers
On 11/01/12 13:56, ying-xiang wrote: Hi Arie, EoMPLS dosen't need to perform MAC learning or MAC look up for forwarding packets.so EoMPLS function can be implement even without a advanced egress line card.is that right?! Yes, exactly right. ___

Re: [c-nsp] why vpls need some special line cards to support

2012-01-11 Thread Phil Mayers
On 09/01/12 17:02, Nick Hilliard wrote: On 09/01/2012 16:40, Phil Mayers wrote: Many forwarding engines e.g. 6500 PFC3 cannot support this. Those platforms require linecards with extended forwarding engines. it's not the forwarding engines that have the problem here - it's the line cards. A

Re: [c-nsp] Reply:RE: why vpls need some special line cards tosupport

2012-01-11 Thread Arie Vayner (avayner)
There are 3 options to configure EoMPLS on 6500/7600: - Port mode: xconnect is configured directly on the port - Sub-interface mode: xconnect is configured on a subinterface (gig0/0.100), using dot1q VLAN to match traffic - SVI (interface vlan): xconnect is configured on SVI The first 2 options

[c-nsp] Cisco 881G PPPoE Issue

2012-01-11 Thread Clayton Zekelman
Hello, I posted this to cisco-bba, but due to the low activity on that list, I figured this might be better off here. I'm trying to se up a Cisco 881G router to act as a PPPoE to L2TP LAC. I have the configuration entered, and have created the bba-group, but for some reason any time I

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 881G PPPoE Issue

2012-01-11 Thread Aled Morris
On 11 January 2012 19:55, Clayton Zekelman clay...@mnsi.net wrote: Cisco IOS Software, C880 Software (C880DATA-UNIVERSALK9-M),**Version 15.1(1)T3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) flash:c880data-universalk9-**mz.151-1.T3.bin I believe IOS 15 on the 881 requires feature licensing. Which licenses do

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco 881G PPPoE Issue

2012-01-11 Thread Clayton Zekelman
I currently have a permanent license for advanced ip services: License Info: License UDI: - Device# PID SN - *0CISCO881G-K9 FTX15388XXX License Information

[c-nsp] 3750 input packet counts (CSCec35100)

2012-01-11 Thread David DeSimone
While browsing I happened to stumble across this bug report: Cat3750: Frames not counted as input packets on a dot1Q trunk Symptoms: On a Catalyst 3750, packets of size 64 to 67 bytes (including the dot1Q tag) that ingress the switch on a dot1Q trunk will not be counted

[c-nsp] erspan for just one IP

2012-01-11 Thread Robert Hass
Hi Is any way to have ERSPAN (on Cat6500) where traffic is copied only for one IP within VLAN. Eg. VLAN400, IP 2.2.2.2 (where VLAN consist /16 subnet and 2k active hosts) Robert ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net