[c-nsp] Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing?

2012-01-26 Thread David Farrell
Hi folks, I'm considering these boxes for a couple of roles within our infrastructure, I'm well aware of the issues they have and the fact they are still a relatively young product. I just wondered if anyone had any good experiences with these boxes? Or alternatively if they could details

Re: [c-nsp] 10Gigabit Ethernet with Sup6L-E

2012-01-26 Thread Piotr Wojciechowski
On 1/25/12 20:39 , Alex D. wrote: Hi list, i have a problem with some a WS-C4506-E chassis. The systems doesn't boot when 1 or both 10G ports are equiped with a X2 transceiver. All status LEDs remain dark. When i power-on the supervisor engine without transceivers, system boots successful.

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing?

2012-01-26 Thread Nick Hilliard
On 26/01/2012 09:15, David Farrell wrote: I'm considering these boxes for a couple of roles within our infrastructure, I'm well aware of the issues they have and the fact they are still a relatively young product. I just wondered if anyone had any good experiences with these boxes? Or

[c-nsp] sip-600 vs sip-601 real life experience

2012-01-26 Thread Yauhen Viadzishchau
Hello, i' wonder, if there are any caveats to run sip-600 in 12416 with SPA-1XTENGE-XFP ? will this combo run DWDM XFP ? Why SIP-601 was enhanced using following feature: Finer control over power supply voltages The 12.0(32)S release allows you to specify the percentage of voltage increase. If

[c-nsp] NETFLOWv9/IPFIX and export of inner traffic in GTP tunnel

2012-01-26 Thread wojtas
Hello, Does anyone has any idea of a router that allows to exports flows of inner traffic in a tunnel, particularly in GTP ? I've heard about, let's say, 3party solutions like nprobe that allows to do that, but nothing comes to mind when speaking about operator-level hardware. Any hints

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing?

2012-01-26 Thread Steve McCrory
Hi David, We are considering these as a replacement for our 3750MEs. The big selling point for us is their ability to support HCBWFQ which we can currently only offer to customers on our 7600 ES-20 ports. Comparing the port cost between the two is night and day which makes them very attractive

[c-nsp] OER Global Learn

2012-01-26 Thread Mohammad Khalil
Hi , i am working on OER setup , all the results are good (i have the INPOLICY in the show oer master traffic-class output) but i want to disable global learn i tried to configure traffic-class filter under the oer master learn sub mode , but the output then disappears i followed the below

Re: [c-nsp] ONS 15454 TCC question

2012-01-26 Thread John Brown
Hi Lee, If memory serves you can put a TCC into a system that already has an active TCC. The inserted TCC will be the protect TCC and it should slave the data over from the Active. That was one way to reset the password. Another is with a special serial port adapter that plugs onto the TCC

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing?

2012-01-26 Thread Mark Tinka
On Thursday, January 26, 2012 07:24:21 PM Nick Hilliard wrote: There are several important features which are still not there, including ipv6 (broken), RSPAN (unimpl), policy routing (unimpl), ASN32 support (unimpl), unicast RPF (unimpl), QoS (problems with egress policing). That pretty

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing?

2012-01-26 Thread Mark Tinka
On Thursday, January 26, 2012 08:09:15 PM Steve McCrory wrote: We are considering these as a replacement for our 3750MEs. The big selling point for us is their ability to support HCBWFQ which we can currently only offer to customers on our 7600 ES-20 ports. Comparing the port cost between

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing?

2012-01-26 Thread Mark Tinka
On Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:03:43 PM Sigurbjörn Birkir Lárusson wrote: Add to that list, no multicast routing in VRF, no MVPN Rosen support Due out Q2'12. We're also looking for this, although BGP- MVPN's is more what we're after (Q1'13 on IOS XR). Mark. signature.asc Description:

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing?

2012-01-26 Thread Sigurbjörn Birkir Lárusson
On the question of whether they're worth buying, The ASR903, which afaik uses the same whale platform, allows you to have either one or two (redundant) and field-replacable RSPs of which two models are available,one being pretty much the ME3600X and the other which is pretty much the ME3800X in a

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing?

2012-01-26 Thread David Farrell
Thanks all for the valued input. To be honest, I can't see us pushing the features hard on these from the outset. The stuff that we do want to dip our toes in the water with are the ME features and some of the QoS features. I've not enjoyed trying to do anything useful with committed access

Re: [c-nsp] ONS 15454 TCC question

2012-01-26 Thread Kyle Duren
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/optical/ps2006/products_tech_note09186a008046bdae.shtml But yes, taking a In service node with 1 TCC card in it, when you insert the foreign TCC card it will slave off of the existing node, upgrading/downgrading it to match the working TCC card and also

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing?

2012-01-26 Thread Mark Tinka
On Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:18:04 PM Sigurbjörn Birkir Lárusson wrote: The ASR903, which afaik uses the same whale platform, allows you to have either one or two (redundant) and field-replacable RSPs of which two models are available,one being pretty much the ME3600X and the other

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing?

2012-01-26 Thread Sigurbjörn Birkir Lárusson
Add to that list, no multicast routing in VRF, no MVPN Rosen support Kind regards, Sibbi Þann 26.1.2012 12:01, skrifaði Mark Tinka mti...@globaltransit.net: On Thursday, January 26, 2012 07:24:21 PM Nick Hilliard wrote: There are several important features which are still not there,

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing?

2012-01-26 Thread Mark Tinka
On Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:49:11 PM David Farrell wrote: I've not enjoyed trying to do anything useful with committed access rates on the Cat 3560s. Forget about CAR, it's old school :-). Go MQC, you'll get what you need, and it's uniform across Cisco's routers (including the IOS

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing?

2012-01-26 Thread David Farrell
Hi Mark, Yes, MQC is another motivation for looking at these and we're an all Ethernet shop so they do fit well with our requirements in many respects. Cheers, David. On 26/01/2012 16:04, Mark Tinka wrote: On Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:49:11 PM David Farrell wrote: I've not enjoyed

Re: [c-nsp] handling customer interfaces for single IP address

2012-01-26 Thread root net
I was wondering if anyone else had any ideas or experiences? Thanks 2011/11/18 root net rootne...@gmail.com Jon, A 7200VXR would be where the 802.1Q sub interfaces would live. What is your experience? rootnet 2011/11/17 Jon Harald Bøvre j...@bovre.no Would be a bit hardware

[c-nsp] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IronPort Appliances Telnet Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

2012-01-26 Thread Cisco Systems Product Security Incident Response Team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IronPort Appliances Telnet Remote Code Execution Vulnerability Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20120126-ironport Revision 1.0 For Public Release 2012 January 26 17:00 UTC (GMT

Re: [c-nsp] handling customer interfaces for single IP address

2012-01-26 Thread Mark Tinka
On Friday, January 27, 2012 12:28:17 AM root net wrote: I was wondering if anyone else had any ideas or experiences? We separate all customers into a different VLAN. Each VLAN is its own sub-interface on the router. We then apply policers on the sub-interface. Mark. signature.asc

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing?

2012-01-26 Thread Waris Sagheer (waris)
Hi Nick, You mentioned broken IPv6, it should be working in the latest image 15.1(2)EY1a. Let me know which image you are having the problem. -SPAN/RSPAN support is being planned for Q4CY12. -4 Byte ASN support is being planned for Q3CY12. -uRPF early 2013 -Egress Policing on non LLQ early 2013

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing?

2012-01-26 Thread Waris Sagheer (waris)
MVPN (Rosen Draft) will be available in the first half of 2012. mLDP is being planned for first half of 2013. -Waris -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 7:12 AM

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing?

2012-01-26 Thread Waris Sagheer (waris)
Hi David, We did a session Designing Access Network With the ME3600X and ME3800X in Cisco Live last year. Session slides can be a good starting point to understand the platform. You can ask the SE to reach out to me. Regards, -Waris -Original Message- From:

[c-nsp] cascade software in use

2012-01-26 Thread chris stand
Hello, Is anyone here using Cascade for network monitoring ? thanks , ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Re: [c-nsp] ONS 15454 TCC question

2012-01-26 Thread Lee Starnes
Thanks John. I wanted to make sure that I did not blow away the config on a card I know the password for in trying to get the new cards cleared and usable. Thanks again. -Lee On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 6:32 AM, John Brown j...@citylinkfiber.com wrote: Hi Lee, If memory serves you can put a TCC

Re: [c-nsp] ONS 15454 TCC question

2012-01-26 Thread Lee Starnes
Thanks Kyle. I was trying to avoid having to send the card out or by the cable so this is helpful. -Lee On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Kyle Duren pixitha.k...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/optical/ps2006/products_tech_note09186a008046bdae.shtml But yes, taking a

Re: [c-nsp] NETFLOWv9/IPFIX and export of inner traffic in GTP tunnel

2012-01-26 Thread Paolo Lucente
Hi, Not precisely what you are asking (flows, NetFlow v9/IPFIX) and not popular (this is c-nsp): you can give a try with a device exporting sFlow since it reports on portion of the datagram. It's less tricky than using SPAN/RSPAN, more scalable since you can leverage packet sampling but it

Re: [c-nsp] 10Gigabit Ethernet with Sup6L-E

2012-01-26 Thread Alex D.
Might be some hardware problem with either supervisor (more likely) or X2 transceivers itself (less likely). Have you tried inserting different X2 transceivers or using same one in different chassis? Yes, i tried 4 different subs with 6 different X2 transceivers. But in the meanwhile, i know

[c-nsp] Nexus 5596 architecture

2012-01-26 Thread Jiri Prochazka
Hi, we are considering investment in a few Nexus 5596 switches. All Cisco documents say it has 96 non-blocking 10G ports (for L2). Is it _really_ true? Can the switch reach throughput of 960 Gbps regardless the traffic distribution? Is't there some hidden limitaion, which is not presented by

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3800X/ME3600X - Any experiences worth sharing?

2012-01-26 Thread Christian Meutes
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:04:50 +0800, Mark Tinka wrote: The only issue you'll face now for the ME3600X/3800X is the lack of egress policing for non-LLQ queues. But gladly, that's just a software fix, so you can live with shapers for now until egress policers arrive for all classes. Not only. In

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 5596 architecture

2012-01-26 Thread Garry
On 27.01.2012 02:30, Jiri Prochazka wrote: Hi, we are considering investment in a few Nexus 5596 switches. All Cisco documents say it has 96 non-blocking 10G ports (for L2). Is it _really_ true? Can the switch reach throughput of 960 Gbps regardless the traffic distribution? Is't there some

[c-nsp] slb ping probe

2012-01-26 Thread Chris Knipe
Hi All, I'm hoping someone will be able to assist. I'm currently exploring my options in terms of using Cisco's SLB as an server load balance instead of what we are currently doing. The SLB itself, is working absolutely flawlessly, and so far, saying that I am impressed is an understatement.