Martin,
If you can easily match the VoIP traffic via an extended access
list, that will be fine. If your ISP is rate limiting you to 20 mbit, you
might want to use shaping or policing to limit your non-preferred traffic to
18 megabit, and then prioritize the VoIP/Skype traffic. This migh
Hi Jeff,
They are looking at it now. Thanks for reporting it.
Preston Chilcote
Cisco TAC
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Kell [mailto:jeff-k...@utc.edu]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 4:23 PM
To: Preston Chilcote (pchilcot)
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Ambiguous
Given the fact that if you have a switch running with such ACL
statements in place (and working), upgrading to 12.2(58) will break them
would seem to be something PSIRT would be interested in (but I received
no response after reporting it).
The bug may be tied to my case :)
Jeff
On 2/2/2012 6:14
You have to unlearn those old-style C4K configurations and use MQC. (QoS cannot
be turned off, so the qos command is not needed. Show qos makes no sense with
MQC, where you do 'sh policy-map')
You have to look under Sup6 (and 4948E!) in the config guide:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/
I did a little digging and found:
CSCts01106Extended ACL is broken when ACL is used with "log" or
"time" kw
I don't think there are plans for anymore 12.2(58)SE throttle rebuilds,
but I'm working to get it fixed in a 15.0(1)SE rebuild, assuming there's
another one planned.
- Preston Chilcote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 10:28:44PM +, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 02/02/2012 22:03, Christopher J. Pilkington wrote:
> > I have seen this statement also on multiple occasions, but I
> > have not found the document showing this 500k number, nor has
>
On 02/02/2012 22:03, Christopher J. Pilkington wrote:
> I have seen this statement also on multiple occasions, but I
> have not found the document showing this 500k number, nor has
> anyone ever referenced a link with it.
This information isn't hard to find.
http://www.google.com/search?q=asr1000
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 03:01:35PM -0600, Blake Dunlap wrote:
> You should note that lit is incorrect in regards to the FIB as was pointed
> out on the list a few days ago. Look lower in the document for the accurate
> numbers based on the included ESP. I believe it is only 500k ipv4.
I have seen
Major (minor) typo on my part. IOS-XE on an ASR 1004. Who put the E and
the R so close together on the keyboard? Switching to Dvorak
-Hammer-
"I was a normal American nerd"
-Jack Herer
On 2/2/2012 2:28 PM, Brian Christopher Raaen wrote:
is this for IOS-XE on an ASR1000 or IOS-XR on an A
On 02/02/2012 17:25, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
> I have some third party XFPs that don't appear to support DOM in IOS but
> they support it in XR. Is this a known phenomenon or am I missing
> something? Unsupported in older IOS, perhaps?
It's line-card model, line card hardware revision and IOS versi
You should note that lit is incorrect in regards to the FIB as was pointed
out on the list a few days ago. Look lower in the document for the accurate
numbers based on the included ESP. I believe it is only 500k ipv4.
-Blake
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 14:08, Christopher J. Pilkington wrote:
> -
is this for IOS-XE on an ASR1000 or IOS-XR on an ASR 9000. I'm
assuming that you mean a ASR1000, but your subject was asking about
IOS-XR which only runs one ASR9000, CRS-1, or CRS-3
---
Brian Raaen
Network Architect
Zcorum
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:20 PM, -Hammer- wrote:
> Based on the number o
Based on the number of questions I see here and on NANOG I guess the
documentation is limited or hard to find on the ASRs. Can anyone provide
a link to some documentation specific to LACP configuration on the XE
software? I understand the functionality showed up somewhere around
2.5-2.6 but my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm looking at the new ASR100x series boxes.
We'll have 6 routers, each with a eBGP upstream and full iBGP
mesh. So, worst case, 6 full tables.
ASR1001 literature claims 1M IPv4 routes in the ESP
documentation, which I'm assuming refers to the FIB.
On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 14:39 +0100, Randy Heimann wrote:
> I am having some difficulty understanding some trace route results that I am
> receiving from the network I am on. If I tracert from my location (France),
> the results are all masked with the destination address (Google's public
> DNS). I
On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 13:41 +0100, Christian Bösch wrote:
> i want to force ipv6 stateful address configuration with dhcpv6.
> therefor i want to disable router advertisements on a cat6500.
Keep in mind that DHCPv6 cannot give you a gateway so you still need the
RAs to connect to anything not on t
On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 22:13 +1100, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
> I've been experimenting with a new (and what I thought was improved
> design/modification) in terms of our internal and external BGP routing,
> and I've hit a bit of a snag.
...
> router bgp 100
> <>
> address-family ipv4
>neighbor
I have some third party XFPs that don't appear to support DOM in IOS but they
support it in XR. Is this a known phenomenon or am I missing something?
Unsupported in older IOS, perhaps?
I'm trying in a 7600/SUP720/12.2(33)SRC4/7600-ES20-10G3CXL:
ios#show int te4/0/0 transceiver detail
Diagnos
Except the global configuration commands are such as 'qos' are not available.
'show qos' is also not available :(
Mack
-Original Message-
From: Asbjorn Hojmark [mailto:li...@hojmark.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 8:16 AM
To: Mack McBride
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re:
The 4948E is basically a fixed-configuration Catalyst 4500 with a Supervisor 6
in a small box, so you can use the 4500 configuration guide.
-A
Sent from my tablet; excuse brevity
On 01/02/2012, at 16.04, Mack McBride wrote:
> Does anyone have documentation on QOS for the 4948E running 15.0(2)
> I am having some difficulty understanding some trace route results that I am
> receiving from the network I am on. If I tracert from my location (France),
> the
> results are all masked with the destination address (Google's public DNS). I
> understand that something in the network is substitu
Hi Erik,
Try this:
aaa authentication login LOCAL_AUTH local >>> keeps your SSH & Telnet working
aaa authorization network VPN_LOCAL_AUTH local for Xauth
crypto map REMOTE_VPN client authentication list LOCAL_AUTH
crypto map REMOTE_VPN isakmp authorization list VPN_LOCAL_AUTH
Create dy
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 01:41:14PM +0100, Christian Bösch wrote:
> ipv6 nd prefix default 3600 3600 no-autoconfig
This is what we use. Send RAs, but tell hosts that they must not use
the info for autoconfig.
> ipv6 nd ra suppress
This doesn't do what you'd expect - it will stop periodic RA
Hello,
I am having some difficulty understanding some trace route results that I am
receiving from the network I am on. If I tracert from my location (France),
the results are all masked with the destination address (Google's public
DNS). I understand that something in the network is substitu
hi list,
i want to force ipv6 stateful address configuration with dhcpv6.
therefor i want to disable router advertisements on a cat6500.
in interface config are some commands which are confusing for me to find
out what they do and what the difference of them is.
maybe someone can explain….
ipv6 n
I've been experimenting with a new (and what I thought was improved
design/modification) in terms of our internal and external BGP routing,
and I've hit a bit of a snag.
We are largely an end user AS but we do have a couple of eBGP customers
connecting to us who require AS transit.
Essential
26 matches
Mail list logo