Hi, list!
We have cisco WS-C4900M (MPC8548) processor (revision 2)
with cat4500e-entservicesk9-mz.122-54.SG.bin IOS on it
at remote location.
It is used to connect to some IXP an have BGP peerings.
Some strange things happens when techs on IXP perform
maintenance tasks such as software upgrade
On (2012-10-17 14:23 +1100), CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list wrote:
Apologies - No, only 1Gb ram
DRAM is practically free and in these cases often literally if you have
time to snoop other people's trashes.
Always max out DRAM before deploying new routers, as the cost of work to do
it later is
Thanks - unfortunately this 7200 is 1000Km's away, so ram upgrade is not easy
Will 1GB support 2 full tables?
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:38:59 +0300
From: s...@ytti.fi
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP full table - 7200 NPE-G2
On (2012-10-17 14:23 +1100),
On (2012-10-17 18:02 +1100), CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list wrote:
Thanks - unfortunately this 7200 is 1000Km's away, so ram upgrade is not easy
Will 1GB support 2 full tables?
It will. Provided you don't have large iBGP or other AFIs.
Long term, schedule upgrade.
--
++ytti
Hi
thanks for your answer but no change.
I see a possible problems in boot message:
System Bootstrap, Version 8.1(3)
Copyright (c) 1994-2004 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Testing lower main memory - data equals address
Testing lower main memory - checkerboard
Testing lower main memory - inverse
We run 3 full tables on 1Gb.
On 17/10/12 11:02, CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list wrote:
Will 1GB support 2 full tables?
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at
Thanks - What is your ram(+CPU) utilisation?
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 12:01:34 +0400
From: sho...@inblock.ru
To: cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com
CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP full table - 7200 NPE-G2
We run 3 full tables on 1Gb.
On 17/10/12 11:02, CiscoNSP_list
Thanks - We do have iBGP, but not large.
Short term(6months), it will be an upgrade to ASR
Cheers.
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:46:16 +0300
From: s...@ytti.fi
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP full table - 7200 NPE-G2
On (2012-10-17 18:02 +1100), CiscoNSP_list
Max ram load is about 62%, plus we run about 25K additional routes here.
As its software based router, CPU pretty much depend of how much traffic
it pass.
On 17/10/12 13:05, CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list wrote:
Thanks - What is your ram(+CPU) utilisation?
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 12:01:34
Hi,
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list wrote:
Thanks - We do have iBGP, but not large.
Short term(6months), it will be an upgrade to ASR
Just FYI:
The ASR100x is a very different platform from the 7206 and 4GB of ram will get
you about 3 full feeds with 450k routes each.
The
I've got a 2821 running 12.4 mainline with two feeds, its 768MB RAM still
has about 300MB free. You should be fine. 15.0 or 15.1 will probably use
more RAM, but if you're anywhere near 500MB free, the second feed shouldn't
use any more than 100MB additional.
Chuck
-Original Message-
Hi all,
I was working on our IPv6 provisioning system and I'm having a hard time
finding a way to poll the IPv6 routing table via SNMP (SXI 5 on SUP720-3BXL).
Is there really no MIB for this yet?
Thanks,
-Drew
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
Il 17/10/2012 14.14, Drew Weaver ha scritto:
I was working on our IPv6 provisioning system and I'm having a hard
time finding a way to poll the IPv6 routing table via SNMP (SXI 5 on
SUP720-3BXL).
Is there really no MIB for this yet?
Try 1.3.6.1.2.1.4.24.7.1. I use it on 7600 with RSP720 and
17.10.2012 10:59, Olivier CALVANO пишет:
Hi
thanks for your answer but no change.
I see a possible problems in boot message:
System Bootstrap, Version 8.1(3)
Copyright (c) 1994-2004 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Testing lower main memory - data equals address
Testing lower main memory -
Hi all,
I was trying to implement OSPFv3 and EIGRP6 as the PE-CE in 6VPE deployment but
seems IOS does not support that yet
Was there any updates in regards?
Thanks
___
cisco-nsp mailing list
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Mohammad Khalil wrote:
I was trying to implement OSPFv3 and EIGRP6 as the PE-CE in 6VPE
deployment but seems IOS does not support that yet Was there any updates
in regards?
It would help if you were to supply the platforms involved and what IOS
versions you're running
Thanks Chuck
From: chuckchu...@gmail.com
To: cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] BGP full table - 7200 NPE-G2
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:10:33 -0400
I've got a 2821 running 12.4 mainline with two feeds, its 768MB RAM still
has about 300MB free. You
Hi ,
Cisco 7206VXR , c7200-adventerprisek9-mz[1].124-20.T
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:48:23 +0200
From: swm...@swm.pp.se
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 PE-CE
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Mohammad Khalil wrote:
I was trying to implement OSPFv3 and EIGRP6 as the PE-CE in
On 10/17/12 1:59 AM, Olivier CALVANO wrote:
Hi
thanks for your answer but no change.
I see a possible problems in boot message:
System Bootstrap, Version 8.1(3)
Copyright (c) 1994-2004 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Testing lower main memory - data equals address
Testing lower main memory -
On the Cisco 12k prp-2 there is a IPv4 Address limit of 1Million routes.
Is there an limit on the number of VRF's that you are able to have?
Thanks
Erik
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or
previous e-mail messages
Have been noticing this for some time but did not consider it worth
pursuing at the time, then recently had to try some traceroutes and
nmaps from off-campus for testing purposes and now it's relevant...
Our internal infrastructure is on private addresses. We have dynamic
NAT enabled for the
OSPFv3 PE-CE is supported starting with IOS 15.2(2)S. The feature name
is OSPFv3 VRF-Lite/PE-CE.
Note that you need to use the new form of the OSPFv3 CLI. For example:
interface f0/0
vrf forwarding red
ipv6 address 2001:db8:1::1/64
ospfv3 1 ipv6 area 0
interface f1/0
vrf forwarding blue
22 matches
Mail list logo
