On 17 January 2013 19:05, Blake Pfankuch bl...@pfankuch.me wrote:
So I'm surfing cisco.com for an environment refresh within our
infrastructure and looking at access switches. I see the Stack Power Cable
in Cisco Commerce workspace now says Catalyst 3750X and 3850 Stack Power
Cable 30 CM
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 08:52:33PM -0500, Jeff Kell wrote:
Known bug? Feature? You can alter a port-channel configuration and
expect it to propagate to the members, correct?
I'd share that assumption. If you alter the port-channel config and the
members fall out of sync, it's a
WS-C3850-48PW - integrated wireless LAN controller? That SKU ships with '5 AP
licenses'.
Sent from my iPhone
On 19/01/2013, at 21:55, Aled Morris al...@qix.co.uk wrote:
On 17 January 2013 19:05, Blake Pfankuch bl...@pfankuch.me wrote:
So I'm surfing cisco.com for an environment refresh
I thought I recently saw a new global command to stop you configuring the
ethernet interface directly when it is in a channel-group...
Unfortunately - I can't find it at the moment...
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Gert Doering g...@greenie.muc.de wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at
Hi,
Known bug? Feature? You can alter a port-channel configuration and
expect it to propagate to the members, correct?
yes - changes to the port-channel are propagated to the members... if you do it
the
other way around then the interface WONT match the port-channel and the link
will go
I'm a partner but have no details. Did you get them from CCO or your CAM?
Sent from my iPhone
On 19/01/2013, at 23:55, Lukasz Bromirski luk...@bromirski.net wrote:
On Jan 19, 2013, at 1:17 PM, Joshua Morgan joshua.mor...@gmail.com wrote:
WS-C3850-48PW - integrated wireless LAN controller?
On Jan 19, 2013, at 2:27 PM, Joshua Morgan joshua.mor...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm a partner but have no details. Did you get them from CCO or your CAM?
I'm with Cisco :) Yes, you should have some messaging from CAMs and
Partner SEs.
--
There's no sense in being precise when |
You have to keep in mind that there are some commands, mostly L1/L2 related,
that apply
only to individual members, so things can sometimes get more tricky.
Hopefully you'll get a warning and nothing more if you try to configure them
under the
port-channel interface.
--
Tassos
Hi,
I am looking for some clarification on QoS on the ASR9K with respectto VLANs
and aggregate policing. I have 3 VLANs running over aBundle and I am receiving
unmarked traffic that I need to unconditionallymark based on VLAN.
(I have omitted the ingress policy-map and class-map syntax
Apologies, but it seems to have messed up my formating... trying again...
I am looking for some clarification on QoS on the ASR9K with respect to VLANs
and aggregate policing. I have 3 VLANs running over a Bundle and I am receiving
unmarked traffic that I need to unconditionally mark based on
Ah, couldn't tell with your e-mail address. I will get in touch with my CAM,
thanks.
Sent from my iPhone
On 20/01/2013, at 0:54, Lukasz Bromirski luk...@bromirski.net wrote:
On Jan 19, 2013, at 2:27 PM, Joshua Morgan joshua.mor...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm a partner but have no details. Did
Hi
I have a lot of cisco 6500 with SUP720-3BLX cards. I use it
for connect remote office.
Office A1 == \
/== Office A2
Office B1 ===\
/=== Office B2
=== Cisco 6500 1 Cisco 6500 2 ===
Office C1 ===/
\=== Office C2
Office D1 ==/
\== Office D2
12 matches
Mail list logo
