[c-nsp] Sup720 software forwarding

Theoretically, if one would happen to have a Sup720 that does software forwarding, how is it that one can check what the reason for punts is? A netdr capture shows packets like this: --- dump of incoming inband packet --- interface Vl212, routine mistral_process_rx_packet_inlin, timestamp

Re: [c-nsp] 4500-X VSS %EC-5-CANNOT_BUNDLE2

https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/24030 Looks like something very strange is going on... On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 5:35 PM, CiscoNSP List wrote: > > > Thanks - Ive already tried removing portchan, defaulting int, following > the guide mentioned below, and I still get the EC-5-CANNOT_BUNDLE2

Re: [c-nsp] 4500-X VSS %EC-5-CANNOT_BUNDLE2

Thanks - Ive already tried removing portchan, defaulting int, following the guide mentioned below, and I still get the EC-5-CANNOT_BUNDLE2 error. I dont have access to the 4500X's atm..Ill send through Int configs as soon as I can. > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 4500-X VSS %EC-5-CANNOT_BUNDLE2 > To

Re: [c-nsp] 4500-X VSS %EC-5-CANNOT_BUNDLE2

'sho run in te1/16' Sounds like you have dtp on it currently and it doesn't like that... Try defaulting the interface first? --Original Message-- From: CiscoNSP List Sender: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] 4500-X VSS %EC-5-CANNOT_BUNDLE2

[c-nsp] IP RIB Update on ASR1006 (RP1/ESP10)

Hi Guys, Just testing first full bgp table on an ASR1006, and IP RIB Update ran for a good 7minutes+ (CPU ~50%) - Is this to be expected? (Im guessing yes) Cheers. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.ne

[c-nsp] 4500-X VSS %EC-5-CANNOT_BUNDLE2

Hi Guys, Following this guide: https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-29472 and when trying to add the physical Int to the portchan, I get: %EC-5-CANNOT_BUNDLE2: TE1/16 is not compatible with PO5 and will be suspended (trunk mode of TE1/16 is dynamic, P05 is trunk) Config has been entered

[c-nsp] 7600/Sup3BXL CPU-MONITOR Issues

All: Recently several of our Sup720-3BXL modules in 7600 routers have crashed with a %CPU_MONITOR-SP-6-NOT_HEARD error. In each crash, the RP is able to generate a crashfile, however the SP is not. We have several TAC cases open about these issues, but I did not know if the collective knowledge he

Re: [c-nsp] Quick question regarding BGP route churn & PRP-2

There is a bug in some of the PRP-2 code relating to the BGP process leaking memory and utilizing more and more CPU. Two things you can do to help eliminate the bug, one is upgrade code, the second is to fully remove inactive BGP sessions. It appears that the router process 'saves' updates for th

Re: [c-nsp] CBAC PPTP outbound issue to server on same isp subnet - 2811

Hi, On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 07:36:47AM -0800, false wrote: > I am using MS VPN/PPTP client. Just as a side note: unless you're aware that there is no useful encryption or authentication in PPTP (anyone who can sniff the session can break it over night, and then use your session's NTLM hash to lo

Re: [c-nsp] Quick question regarding BGP route churn & PRP-2

Hi, You could try to enable bgp dampening. Dumitru On 07-Mar-13 3:20 PM, Drew Weaver wrote: > Howdy, > > One of our routers in a smaller facility is still rocking a pair of PRP-2s > and we've been getting notices lately that it has been failing to respond to > SNMP queries. > > Makes sense

[c-nsp] CBAC PPTP outbound issue to server on same isp subnet - 2811

I am using MS VPN/PPTP client. This client works fine from home but not at the office. At our office, we have a 192.168.2.0 /24 subnet. We have two DSL connections from the same provider. Both of these DSL connections are in the same Class C subnet. One DSL is used for the office users and one

Re: [c-nsp] Quick question regarding BGP route churn & PRP-2

Certainly doesn't solve the problem, but can you extend the snmp timeout and failure count allowed for the device in your monitoring applications? If your only problem are false errors in the monitoring system (i.e. there are no operating problems with the high CPU usage), perhaps that's enough to

[c-nsp] Quick question regarding BGP route churn & PRP-2

Howdy, One of our routers in a smaller facility is still rocking a pair of PRP-2s and we've been getting notices lately that it has been failing to respond to SNMP queries. Makes sense, as my cell phone likely has a better CPU than the PRP-2 but I wanted to see if there was any way to extend t

[c-nsp] Option 82

Hi allWhat smaller Cisco device that supports DHCP option 82 Thanks BR, ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/

Re: [c-nsp] summary, but leak a couple

I believe this should work route-policy RP-LEAK-SPEC if destination in (10.10.10.0/24) then unsuppress-route else suppress-route endif end-policy ! router bgp 64512 vrf 1 address-family ipv4 unicast aggregate-address 10.0.0.0/8 route-policy RP-LEAK-SPEC ! adam -Original