I'm wondering if anyone has a working ospfv3 setup
between a Cisco and Brocade device? As best I can
tell, Brocade's only possible setup is either no
auth and no encryption, or, sha1 auth, sha1 encryption,
esp packets.
On the Cisco side, the only option that gives you
esp packets is "ipv6 ospf en
Do you have a choice? 4.0.3 was stable for while then more issues came out. It
has reached engineering support. You have to upgrade to 4.2.3 or 4.3.0.
Version 4.3.0 has more feature for BNG. If you do not need it, you can stay
with 4.2.3 but you have to install mandatory SMUs.
-Judy
__
Use the one in the CCIE-SP exam at least you can practise on it while using
it ;)
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:55 AM, Xu Hu wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Any idea which version is the most stable one currently, need to deploy new
> ASR9K inside the network, am considering to use which version.
>
> No nee
Hi Folks,
Any idea which version is the most stable one currently, need to deploy new
ASR9K inside the network, am considering to use which version.
No need additional features, just normal OSPF, BGP, MPLS, MPLS/TE, MPLS/VPN.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Hu Xu
___
Just an update to this - I have found some third party SFP's(Copper) that work
without issue from NHR - They are specifically designed for the 4500x's (But
also work fine in ASR's/4948's etc etc)
SFP-GE-T-WIRE-NHR - 1000BASE-T SFP with
wire clip (mainly for 4500X)
> From: cisconsp_l...@hotmail
Something like this should do the trick:
event manager applet ALLOWED-VLAN
event cli pattern "switchport trunk allowed vlan +[0-9]+.*" mode "interface"
enter
action 001 puts "ERROR: "switchport trunk allowed vlan" is not allowed. Use
Add/Remove"
action 002 set _exit_status "0"
The regex on
Hello Nick,
Thanks for your reply, i am totally agree with you.
Regards,
Ahmed
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 15/04/2013 21:44, Ahmed Hilmy wrote:
> > I am using Prefix-list and as-path for BGP filter.
> > But if i apply Prefix-list as inbound filter at PE, then f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Simon Lockhart wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm working on a project which uses GPON to connect tens of thousands
> of properties in a fibre-to-the-home environment. Each property will
> be handed off to me as a double-tagged vlan, one per property.
> Obviously
On Wed Apr 17, 2013 at 12:57:05PM -0700, Bruce Pinsky wrote:
> Simon Lockhart wrote:
> > What I'd come up with is that I'd "ignore" the inner tags, and just
> > use the outer S-Tag to put the properties into subnets (one per
> > S-Tag), and then just do DHCP. However, I'm not quite sure how I'd
> >
All,
I'm working on a project which uses GPON to connect tens of thousands of
properties in a fibre-to-the-home environment. Each property will be handed
off to me as a double-tagged vlan, one per property. Obviously I don't want
to manually create tens of thousands of subinterfaces on a router,
On 17/04/2013, at 21:21, Sébastien MALHEIRO wrote:
>
> We’re having some issues with inter-vlan traffic going pretty slow on
> 6504-E chassis working in VSS (VS-S720-10G / WS-X6748-GE-TX), running IOS
> version 12.2(33)SXH5.
This seems like a very old version - especially if you are running VSS.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco TelePresence Infrastructure Denial of Service
Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20130417-tpi
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2013 April 17 16:00 UTC (GMT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Network Admission Control Manager SQL Injection
Vulnerability
Advisory ID: cisco-sa-20130417-nac
Revision 1.0
For Public Release 2013 April 17 16:00 UTC (GMT
Hi,
> Does anyone has idea or suggestion that which command is used on Switches to
> write EEM applet through Cisco IOS Cli as the above mentioned command is not
> working on switches. What is the syntax??
WHAT switches are you dealing with as many dont have any EEM ability
alan
__
On 17 April 2013 14:08, amir agha wrote:
Hi Ami,
> However, if one forgets to include the keyword,
> the command defaults to replace:
>
> switchport trunk allowed vlan
>
> the VLAN that has already been placed on vlan deleted and result in downtime
Many have solved same problem in TACACS.
Hi
In routers for writing EEM applet through Cisco IOS Cli we normally use
following command
event manager applet (name) trap
Does anyone has idea or suggestion that which command is used on Switches to
write EEM applet through Cisco IOS Cli as the above mentioned command is not
working on sw
On 17/04/13 12:21, Sébastien MALHEIRO wrote:
#sh interfaces Vlan41 stats
#sh cef interface Vlan 41
You have to be a bit careful with these types of commands on 6500. Some
of them show software state, some of them hardware state, and it
requires some experience to know which.
It sounds like
On 17/04/13 12:08, amir agha wrote:
Hi
I am writing a EEM using Cisco ios cli, can anyone have valuable suggestion
about how to materialize it. Following is the topic
Using following command on switch i.e
switchport trunk allowed vlan
However, if one forgets to include the keyword,
the c
HHi,
We’re having some issues with inter-vlan traffic going pretty slow on
6504-E chassis working in VSS (VS-S720-10G / WS-X6748-GE-TX), running IOS
version 12.2(33)SXH5.
Here’s the thing :
We have added 2 new Vlans on the swtichs (Vlan 41 : Production / Vlan 95 :
Admin).
Our customer told
Hi
I am writing a EEM using Cisco ios cli, can anyone have valuable suggestion
about how to materialize it. Following is the topic
Using following command on switch i.e
switchport trunk allowed vlan
However, if one forgets to include the keyword,
the command defaults to replace:
switchpor
I use the template toolkit perl module.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Hi,
Looking for any recommendations for a template utility - i.e., for adding new
vrf's, interfaces, vlans to switches etc? Where you just enter in variables
(eg, vrf name, rd), and a pre-defined template is generated with the variables
entered.
Has anyone used Solarwinds network config manag
Beware of one thing 6PE can not do.
BGPv6 over multi-hop will not work as there is no recursive lookup from v6
too v4 in your BGP speaker.
This is a feature, not a bug... so it will not be fixed.
Otherwise 6PE is a breeze.
On 14 April 2013 21:56, Ahmed Hilmy wrote:
> Hello Expert,
>
> We are
Hi allI have found out why this was happening , I already configured MPLS TE in
my network and that's why the RPF check failure occured !
BR,
> CC: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> From: thegame...@yahoo.com
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Multicast
> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 07:03:13 -0400
> To: gunner_...@live
24 matches
Mail list logo
