VPLS multihoming is the major up-shot of BGP-VPLS in my opinion. Saves
the need for xSTP within your network when dual-homing a customer to
multiple PEs which makes everybody happy.
Caillin
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Adam Vi
Doesn't have to though...
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios-xml/ios/iproute_bgp/configuration/15-mt/irg-route-map-continue.html
Which makes it *very* powerful
-Blake
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Scott Granados wrote:
> You've got it pretty much on the money. The thing to remember in yo
You've got it pretty much on the money. The thing to remember in your / this
example is that when a route map gets a match it exits and takes the action
based on the match.
On Apr 22, 2013, at 5:08 PM, David Hubbard
wrote:
> From: Jon Lewis [mailto:jle...@lewis.org]
>>
>> On Mon, 22 Apr 20
Hi Adam,
15.2(4)S3 would be the recommended release. However 3x10gig on ME3600X-24CX
will be supported in 15.3(1)S release.15.3(1)S2 would also be a good candidate.
Best Regards,
[http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg]
Waris Sagheer
Technical Marketing Manager
From: Jon Lewis [mailto:jle...@lewis.org]
>
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2013, Gert Doering wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:25:11PM -0400, David Hubbard wrote:
> >> route-map upstream-one permit 10
> >> set community 1:123
> >
> > "set community 1:123 additive"
>
> OTOH, if you're havi
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:25:11PM -0400, David Hubbard wrote:
route-map upstream-one permit 10
set community 1:123
"set community 1:123 additive"
OTOH, if you're having them RTBH an IP, do you really care about any of
the other community tags
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:25:11PM -0400, David Hubbard wrote:
> route-map upstream-one permit 10
> set community 1:123
"set community 1:123 additive"
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert
Hi all, we've recently set up real time blackholing via a
trigger router and a route map that applies to our
'redistribute static' clause in the BGP config. That route
map just looks for a specific tag, changes local pref, sets
the discard route and sets some communities that correspond
to the req
On 4/22/13 10:40 AM, "Rolf Hanßen" wrote:
Hello,
after 2 afternoons of trial and error I now got it running.
I replaced the memory modules (RP and SP Ram, not the flash) and could
boot from the 64MB flash modules then.
The CF card was still not accepted.
I needed to boot into some older image,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
> While we are on the topic what do you folks think about BGP signaled VPLS
> please?
> While I would prefer BGP in favor of LDP signaling as I believe it saves
> control plane overhead (1 BGP session VS n-1 LDP sessions), I have
Hello,
after 2 afternoons of trial and error I now got it running.
I replaced the memory modules (RP and SP Ram, not the flash) and could
boot from the 64MB flash modules then.
The CF card was still not accepted.
I needed to boot into some older image, format the CF card in disk0 of the
Sup720.
T
While we are on the topic what do you folks think about BGP signaled VPLS
please?
While I would prefer BGP in favor of LDP signaling as I believe it saves
control plane overhead (1 BGP session VS n-1 LDP sessions), I have heard a
valid objection as to why to run yet another functionality/feature (
Ahhh, thanks Nick, hence why my scenario using LDP Signaling didn't need it
huh. Thanks for the clarification
Aaron
From: Nick Ryce [mailto:n...@fluency.net.uk]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 8:48 AM
To: Aaron; 'Waris Sagheer (waris)'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP
Hi Aaron,
The VE ID etc is for BGP signalling.
Nick
--
Nick Ryce
Fluency Communications Ltd.
e. n...@fluency.net.uk
w. http://fluency.net.uk/
t. 0845 874 7000
From: Aaron mailto:aar...@gvtc.com>>
Date: Monday, 22 April 2013 14:28
To: "'Waris Sagheer (waris)'" mailto:wa...@cisco.com>>, Nick
R
On 22/04/2013 08:06, Voigt, Thomas wrote:
> Maybe you can get some input what to test from this document:
>
> http://www.miercom.com/pdf/reports/20110216.pdf
>
> Especially pulling one of the (redundant) controller cards off is
> interesting...
As with all performance comparison tests carried o
I ran vpls w/bgp ad w/ldg sig between (2) asr9k's and (4) me3600's and I
didn't have to use ve id nor ve range.. Is there something I would miss out
on without using ve id or ve range? Also, is there a default value
associated with ve id or ve range that was enacted in the absence of my not
explic
ME3600X-24CX
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Nick Hilliard
Sent: Monday, 22 April 2013 10:35 PM
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR9k to Me3600x VPLS
On 22/04/2013 12:56, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
> Also would it ha
>Have any of you seen a situation where PIM joins stay up even when they
shouldn't?
Once the next hop for the route to Source or RP changes resulting in RPF
change, there should be an immediate/triggered Prune sent out of the AtoD
interface followed by a Join sent out the AtoB interface.
Best wou
On 22/04/2013 12:56, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
> Also would it have the knob to only enable 3x10GigE with the license for 2
> additional 10GigE interfaces
there are only 2x10G ports on a me3600/me3800, so not sure how a license
would enable three of them.
Nick
__
Hi Waris,
So is the 15.2(4)S3 a best stable one please?
Also would it have the knob to only enable 3x10GigE with the license for 2
additional 10GigE interfaces -or that one is only supported in 15.3 please?
Thank you very much
adam
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun.
Hi Everyone,
I have posted a document at the following link which covers Web based L3VPN
configuration using EEM scripts. The scripts are embedded in the document and
just need to be copy/pasted into the switch or router. Document name is
l3vpn_eem_script.docx and can be downloaded using the dow
Hi Ahmed,
you wrote:
> Alcatel-Lucent has completed our project deployment IP/MPLS
> Backbone, 7750
> SR7 - 7750 SR12, they suggest test plan but i am thinking if
> i can ad some
> tests.
Maybe you can get some input what to test from this document:
http://www.miercom.com/pdf/reports/20110216
22 matches
Mail list logo
