Re: [c-nsp] ASR9k Too Frequent Update on Rancid

On 03.05.2013 03:11, a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote: Hi, We have recently added a new ASR9k into the nerwork. Prior to this we have other routers running IOS XR namely CRS. Being IOS XR the config in Rancid are the same for the CRS and also the ASR9k, however the ASR9k has been "chatty" report

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF Multiple Area links question

This is info I got from standards but I was told that there is no bb dependency from TAC. It is still under test. Thanks, Judy From: ITLabworks Globaldesk To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; juxia...@yahoo.com Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2013 12:17 PM Subject: Re: [c-n

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF Multiple Area links question

Thats right. links must originate from the backbone or area directly connected to the back bone. Regards, BEN ITLabworks Op 2-5-2013 0:56, judy teng schreef: I think I have a solution which only works for areas attached to area 0 on ABRs. From: judy teng

Re: [c-nsp] ASR9k Too Frequent Update on Rancid

Hi, > We have recently added a new ASR9k into the nerwork. Prior to this we have > other routers running IOS XR namely CRS. > Being IOS XR the config in Rancid are the same for the CRS and also the > ASR9k, however the ASR9k has been "chatty" reporting changes as shown below > but not the CRS

[c-nsp] ASR9k Too Frequent Update on Rancid

Hi C-NSP Members, We have recently added a new ASR9k into the nerwork. Prior to this we have other routers running IOS XR namely CRS. Being IOS XR the config in Rancid are the same for the CRS and also the ASR9k, however the ASR9k has been "chatty" reporting changes as shown below but not t

Re: [c-nsp] netflow tools

On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 08:36:33PM +0200, Nicolas Debrigode wrote: > Hi, > > Try this tool : https://github.com/manuelkasper/AS-Stats +1 for as-stats. I just added netflow v5 support for it on Monday. C. -- +442077294797 (Office) +442031379505 (DDI) http://mediasp.com/

Re: [c-nsp] Old emails are re appearing in this mailing-list

I try to make sure all the emails make the list, even if they are old :-) Sorry for the problem, it should be better now and email should be much faster... Jared Mauch On May 2, 2013, at 9:12 AM, arulgobinath emmanuel wrote: > I'm not sure the reason behind it , better check the date before r

[c-nsp] Old emails are re appearing in this mailing-list

I'm not sure the reason behind it , better check the date before replying or spending your valuable time. i already replied two emails that was send 2010 & 2011. Regards, Gobinath. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nethe

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Switch Packet Buffering Matrix?

On 02/05/2013 13:21, Andrew Miehs wrote: > For iSCSI I would be looking at 45xx, 49xx, 65xx or Nexus 5k or 7k. 6500 lan cards also have quite poor buffers. Better to use a system with larger shared buffers rather than smaller dedicated buffers, if it's store-n-forward. Cut-thru switches behave s

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Switch Packet Buffering Matrix?

+1 All of those access class switches have terrible buffers, you don't want to run SAN traffic on them. -Blake On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Andrew Miehs wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Skeeve Stevens >wrote: > > > I am doing some iSCSI implementations are the moment and are lo

Re: [c-nsp] Mysterious gigabit interface - ME3600

I meant to say the bug mentioned hides the g0/25 interface On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Pete Lumbis wrote: > It's an internal interface for monitoring. CSCuc74439 which is fixed in > 15.3.2S1 I believe. > > > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Eric Van Tol wrote: > >> Hi all, >> Upon upgradin

Re: [c-nsp] Mysterious gigabit interface - ME3600

It's an internal interface for monitoring. CSCuc74439 which is fixed in 15.3.2S1 I believe. On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Eric Van Tol wrote: > Hi all, > Upon upgrading some ME3600s to 15.3(2)S, we noticed that there is now a > GigabitEthernet0/25 interface in the configuration. I searched t

Re: [c-nsp] netflow tools

Hi, Try this tool : https://github.com/manuelkasper/AS-Stats Regards, Le 1 mai 2013 19:56, "Sharlon Carty" a écrit : > Hello, > > ** ** > > Anyone know of any netflow collector tools that can filter the data based > on ASN? The majority tools I have tried filter based on IP address, IP > g

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Switch Packet Buffering Matrix?

On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Skeeve Stevens wrote: > I am doing some iSCSI implementations are the moment and are looking at > which switch models are best for different iSCSI rollouts we’re doing. > > ** ** > > I am wanting to know which 29xx and 35xx/37xx series switches have the > followi

Re: [c-nsp] 6509 crash, and the following upgrade

We use rancid as well, however we are looking for testing before we push this change, not rolling back after something goes wrong. I guess I should have explained this a little better. We have lab equipment for most of our hardware, however we do not for our core 6509 switches. As an example,

[c-nsp] Mysterious gigabit interface - ME3600

Hi all, Upon upgrading some ME3600s to 15.3(2)S, we noticed that there is now a GigabitEthernet0/25 interface in the configuration. I searched the docs and couldn't find anything related to this. Anyone know what this is? Thanks, evt ___ cisco-nsp m

Re: [c-nsp] Spanning Tree Instances

Thus spake Leigh Harrison (lharri...@convergencegroup.co.uk) on Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:48:06PM +: > Hello all, > > We have run into an issue on a 3750 switch where it has run out of spanning > tree instances. > > Is this a limitation of PVST or is it a limitation of the switch? I can't

Re: [c-nsp] FW: 2960S drops/packet loss

hehe...thanks for the reply, but this post was sent back in 2011...for some reason, a few "older" posts seemed to have arrived today. And agree 100% - We replaced a 2960G with a 4948, and no longer see any drops. From: mack.mcbr...@viawest.com To: johnellio...@hotmail.com; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.n

Re: [c-nsp] remove giles.cooc...@williamhill.com

Ha Ha!!! Ran - you really need to learn a few things!!! On 01/05/2013 17:23, David Prall wrote: In the header is the following: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive:

Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Switch Packet Buffering Matrix?

May be this is helpful : http://people.ucsc.edu/~warner/buffer.html "Information here is by *rumor, innuendo and extrapolation*. Manufacturers rarely put info on packet buffers in their data sheets." On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Skeeve Stevens wrote: > Hey all, > > ** ** > > I am doing

[c-nsp] PLEASE REMOVE

Kind Regards, Frank Pecora P3 Systems, Inc. Direct: +1-585-334-2976 Mobile: +1-585-406-1928 www.P3systemsinc.com ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether

Re: [c-nsp] Spanning Tree Instances

It looks to be a limitation of the platform. Taken from the release notes for 12.2(55)SE for Catalyst 3750X switch: The switch supports 128 spanning-tree instances. If a switch has more active VLANs than supported spanning-tree instances, spanning tree can be enabled on 128 VLANs and is disab

Re: [c-nsp] Spanning Tree Instances

128 vlans by chance? http://sabotage-networks.blogspot.com/2010/02/cisco-gotchas-max-vlans-and-stp.html -Blake On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Leigh Harrison < lharri...@convergencegroup.co.uk> wrote: > Hello all, > > ** ** > > We have run into an issue on a 3750 switch where it has run

Re: [c-nsp] Removing the Route Server ASN

What was meant is remove it from the AS path, not the server itself. You still peer with the route server using the AS number for the route-server, but it doesn’t add its own AS to the AS path and further it doesn’t do next-hop-self so it retains the original next-hop on the exchange. Clients of

Re: [c-nsp] remove giles.cooc...@williamhill.com

In the header is the following: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help:

Re: [c-nsp] help

I'm being repressed? -Blake On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Bill Wade (wwade) wrote: > ** ** > > ** ** > > [image: http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/logo02.jpg] > > > *Bill Wade* > Technical Leader Engineering > Service Provider Systems Unit > ww...@cisco.com > Phone

Re: [c-nsp] Compatibility Issue

This should cover it: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SX/release /notes/ol_14271.pdf I don’t believe the E versus non-E chassis drop line card support, it’s the IOS version that does. In this case, SXH dropped support for some line cards that SXF and ear

Re: [c-nsp] POST PortASIC Failure: Fail PortPhyLoopback

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Williams, Ray wrote: And, this is what the POST message looks like when the port *does not* connect > to the DEMARC after a reboot. > > POST: PortASIC Port Loopback Tests : Begin > > POST: Failed PortPhyLoopback Packet Test asic_index 1 port_hardware_index >

Re: [c-nsp] 6509 crash, and the following upgrade

> > Anyone know of a good tool for checking for syntax changes as we change > IOS and boot versions? Or is there a decent service out there we could rent > "lab" equipment of our current config to test the upgrade? We use Rancid from shrubbery.net to do this sort of thing. It takes config snaps

Re: [c-nsp] OSPF Multiple Area links question

It works for any two standard areas. adam -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of judy teng Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 12:29 AM To: cisco-nsp Subject: [c-nsp] OSPF Multiple Area links question Hello, Can somebody tell if OSPF multiple

Re: [c-nsp] Inconsistent CLNS/IS-IS routes

I'd start by checking the isis database first. On Algiers do: ALG2-R26-01#sh isis dat 0030.6E4B.455C.00-00 ver (I'm not sure whether the name of the LSP ends with .00-00) . You can do: ALG2-R26-01#sh isis dat ver |be 0030.6E4B.455C You can also check whether you see the server's LSP on Oran. OR

Re: [c-nsp] Time warp?

I've been seeing HTML and some blank emails too since yesterday. Chuck -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Seth Mattinen Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 1:24 PM To: cisco-nsp Subject: [c-nsp] Time warp? Am I on crack or are messages be

Re: [c-nsp] Choosing Switches to Support VM Clusters

I'm about to scrap my 3750E for a 49xx. I have packet drops and buffer misses. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

[c-nsp] 6509 crash, and the following upgrade

Well the inevitable happened. We have 2x 6509-NEB-A running sup 720 3bxl's and after 5 years of uptime, one of them finally crashed. Showing a parity error, Cisco gave the usual song and dance "software parity error means it was probably a solar flare" so we are going to take the opportunity t

[c-nsp] shaping on Cisco switch

Hi Guys, We have a need to shape services from a provider, which we can do on "CE" Cisco routers like so - eg 20Mb service: shape average 1960 96000 0 Some of our EC's do not run Cisco's, and have devices not capable of shapingwe are looking at implementing a Cisco switch(Or alternativ

Re: [c-nsp] Removing the Route Server ASN

Hi, > But if you remove the ASN of the route server how would the clients peer with > it? The route server has an ASN, but it doesn't show up in the AS path. See http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios-xml/ios/iproute_bgp/configuration/xe-3s/asr1000/irg-route-server.pdf for information on how to d

Re: [c-nsp] Time warp?

Nope, you are not the only one it is happening to. Sent from my iPhone On 02/05/2013, at 3:24 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote: > Am I on crack or are messages being sent from 2010 to the list? > > ~Seth > ___ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.

Re: [c-nsp] Time warp?

Seth Mattinen wrote: >Am I on crack or are messages being sent from 2010 to the list? > >~Seth >___ >cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco

Re: [c-nsp] Left-field trivia questions...

(1) yeah I was wondering why there are so many emails on the list and mails formatting is now html all of a sudden, than I noticed the sent date is dating back to 2010. So I'm glad it's not just me :) (2) I guess that depends on tacacs implementation. Though even if that would work I'd rec

Re: [c-nsp] Left-field trivia questions...

"Carriage return at the password prompt" is indeed an ACS feature (at least as of ACS 5.3). Pretty much the first thing I did when installing ACS was to switch off the feature, for two reasons: 1. "Telnet change password" is, as its name suggests, only available via telnet. Since we wanted to en

Re: [c-nsp] netflow tools

I highly recommends to look at pmacct (pmacct.net) --- Nikita On 18.09.2010, at 20:03, "Sharlon Carty" wrote: > Hello, > > Anyone know of any netflow collector tools that can filter the data based on > ASN? The majority tools I have tried filter based on IP address, IP group, > domain name